Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 05-12-2018

(05-12-2018, 03:55 AM)samba99 Wrote:
(05-12-2018, 02:40 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-11-2018, 08:23 PM)samba99 Wrote:
(05-11-2018, 06:24 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-11-2018, 02:10 AM)Zane Wrote: Yesterday, I played 2 Loops of DMSI A-US-Track.....Today I feel like a Vegetable. I guess I set volume too high yesterday..

Two loops a day of DMSI 3.2 is not a light workout. There's a reason I said 1 a day in the instructions.

Shannon I think DMSI is way too strong to be used everyday, speaking in terms of results..

Secondary ASRB calculations would have been a lot closer to 1:1 if that were the case for a majority of people.

Maybe I’m a special case then, I am a person who do not like being told what to do. In fact I don’t like it all to the point even if something I wanted to do but someone else told me to do it I’ll do the opposite.

I had the same thing going on.

Actually, my time DMSIng helped me resolve this, especially ver. 3.2A, so... Big Grin


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 05-12-2018

(05-12-2018, 03:55 AM)samba99 Wrote:
(05-12-2018, 02:40 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-11-2018, 08:23 PM)samba99 Wrote:
(05-11-2018, 06:24 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-11-2018, 02:10 AM)Zane Wrote: Yesterday, I played 2 Loops of DMSI A-US-Track.....Today I feel like a Vegetable. I guess I set volume too high yesterday..

Two loops a day of DMSI 3.2 is not a light workout. There's a reason I said 1 a day in the instructions.

Shannon I think DMSI is way too strong to be used everyday, speaking in terms of results..

Secondary ASRB calculations would have been a lot closer to 1:1 if that were the case for a majority of people.

Maybe I’m a special case then, I am a person who do not like being told what to do. In fact I don’t like it all to the point even if something I wanted to do but someone else told me to do it I’ll do the opposite.

I used to be like that. Then I realized how much it was costing me in life, and I changed my stubbornness to strength of will, which mean now I will think about what makes the most sense for me to do before I act, instead of blindly stonewalling or reversing. This is consciously, of course. I don't resist subliminals, though.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - anansi26 - 05-12-2018

Shannon,
Would you ever consider ditching the aura part of DMSI and just focus on everything else that would get us laid?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - JCasterlin - 05-12-2018

(05-06-2018, 04:56 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-05-2018, 06:26 PM)JCasterlin Wrote:
(05-05-2018, 06:00 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-05-2018, 01:50 PM)mat422 Wrote: Shannon, seeing as how you've been watching a ton of people use dmsi on this forum I'm curious to know something. Do you think that some of these resistance tactics are hidden from the conscious mind? Even if we are super mindful and pay close attention, things slip through the cracks and it's only after the fact we learn from it. It's almost like things just become incredibly distorted, down is up and up is down, bad is good and good is bad, etc. I've had moments where I thought I was headed in the right direction, but it turns out I was actively resisting and my mind convinced me I was moving forward. I was actually moving away from accepting instructions and I thought the fighting was me overcoming my subconscious attempt to derail me. It just seems like even if we are super aware and mindful of the tricks, it's damn near impossible to catch them until after the fact.

So we go through this cycle, and we catch them, and we patch them, and we rise and repeat. That's the best we can do. Eventually there will be no more holes, no more escapes, no more ways out, around, under or through except to accomplish the design goals. That's why we're at 3.2 and still going.

I'm expecting to make some important breakthroughs here in the next 2-4 months, so we shall see. But no matter what resistance tactics we encounter, we will eventually overcome and defeat them. It's just a learning process for me, as it is for you guys. But with each release, we are getting closer, better and more effective and powerful.

Shannon , is there any instructional difference in listening to a 5.5G vs a 5G or is it the same?

5.5G programs are designed using newer technologies which require use in loops, instead of hours. As Ben said, it comes out to much less time than 5G required per day. Also the secondary ASRB means you may need to take a break every so often from using the sub; DMSI 3.2 introduces this. Finally, P5 and P6 mean that the sub is running in your head for 21 or 35 days after you stop using it (depending on which is in the program) and that means you need to take a break from using subs for a while to avoid having two 5.5G subs running in your head at the same time if you want to avoid the clash.

I was referring to E2 since its 5.5G. If I'm listening to it for 8 to 12 hours a day is that too much?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - lano1106 - 05-12-2018

I'm currently using Ultrasonic version. I was wondering if it was the best choice. Which versionis best or what is the pros/cons of each between:

Hybrid
Masked
and Ultrasonic

??


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 05-12-2018

Is there any chance of making the pheromone module stronger in the next version (if its possible)?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 05-13-2018

(05-12-2018, 12:46 PM)anansi26 Wrote: Shannon,
Would you ever consider ditching the aura part of DMSI and just focus on everything else that would get us laid?

You do realize that the key element of DMSI achieving it's goals, has been by design, since day one, the aura, right? If it wouldn't take me days of work I know would be wasted, I would build a "c" without it and show you how preposterous the results would be.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 05-13-2018

(05-12-2018, 01:18 PM)JCasterlin Wrote:
(05-06-2018, 04:56 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-05-2018, 06:26 PM)JCasterlin Wrote:
(05-05-2018, 06:00 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-05-2018, 01:50 PM)mat422 Wrote: Shannon, seeing as how you've been watching a ton of people use dmsi on this forum I'm curious to know something. Do you think that some of these resistance tactics are hidden from the conscious mind? Even if we are super mindful and pay close attention, things slip through the cracks and it's only after the fact we learn from it. It's almost like things just become incredibly distorted, down is up and up is down, bad is good and good is bad, etc. I've had moments where I thought I was headed in the right direction, but it turns out I was actively resisting and my mind convinced me I was moving forward. I was actually moving away from accepting instructions and I thought the fighting was me overcoming my subconscious attempt to derail me. It just seems like even if we are super aware and mindful of the tricks, it's damn near impossible to catch them until after the fact.

So we go through this cycle, and we catch them, and we patch them, and we rise and repeat. That's the best we can do. Eventually there will be no more holes, no more escapes, no more ways out, around, under or through except to accomplish the design goals. That's why we're at 3.2 and still going.

I'm expecting to make some important breakthroughs here in the next 2-4 months, so we shall see. But no matter what resistance tactics we encounter, we will eventually overcome and defeat them. It's just a learning process for me, as it is for you guys. But with each release, we are getting closer, better and more effective and powerful.

Shannon , is there any instructional difference in listening to a 5.5G vs a 5G or is it the same?

5.5G programs are designed using newer technologies which require use in loops, instead of hours. As Ben said, it comes out to much less time than 5G required per day. Also the secondary ASRB means you may need to take a break every so often from using the sub; DMSI 3.2 introduces this. Finally, P5 and P6 mean that the sub is running in your head for 21 or 35 days after you stop using it (depending on which is in the program) and that means you need to take a break from using subs for a while to avoid having two 5.5G subs running in your head at the same time if you want to avoid the clash.

I was referring to E2 since its 5.5G. If I'm listening to it for 8 to 12 hours a day is that too much?

E2 is "do what works for you". Some people do well at 1-2 hours a day, some people do best at 10-12. You'll know if it's too much.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 05-13-2018

(05-12-2018, 01:36 PM)lano1106 Wrote: I'm currently using Ultrasonic version. I was wondering if it was the best choice. Which versionis best or what is the pros/cons of each between:

Hybrid
Masked
and Ultrasonic

??

Hybrid gives you the best of both other options, but it is going to be best for people who don't resist "being told what to do" because it has the ultrasonic component, which by virtue of its volume, is commonly interpreted by such people as "being told what to do". If you can use it, it's the most powerful. I'm not entirely convinced that just using this wouldn't overcome the "don't tell me what to do!" response if it was used enough. For everyone else, this is boot camp.

Masked is what works best and most quickly and obviously for the "don't tell me what to do!" crowd. For the rest, it isn't usually as motivating. It is the gentlest of the three formats because of the volume being so low, but then, more is not always better.

The ultrasonic works best for those people who don't fall into the "don't tell me what to do!" crowd and don't want to listen to the masked audio found in a masked or hybrid track. It's not as powerful as hybrid, but because of the increased volume, more powerful than masked.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 05-13-2018

(05-12-2018, 03:22 PM)kingpill Wrote: Is there any chance of making the pheromone module stronger in the next version (if its possible)?

You do understand that by manipulating your pheromone signature, we are also manipulating your hormonal system and its effect on your body, correct? Making the pheromone module "stronger" I presume means you want it to compete with the massive amounts of synthetic pheromones you can get and put on externally. I'm not entirely sure that would be safe to do, but I can look into what trying to do that would do.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - josh84 - 05-13-2018

Hi Shannon, You have mentioned to me previously hybrid works best as im partly deaf and im using headphones, but if i also have the dont tell me what to do type personality which im not sure i do but if i did masked is best, if i was to use masked how low of the volume is recommended?

Just not sure which is best considering my situation but im not seeing much in terms of results so far internally or externally on hybrid.

I started 3.2b hybrid again today.

Thanks.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - JCasterlin - 05-13-2018

(05-13-2018, 03:55 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-12-2018, 01:18 PM)JCasterlin Wrote:
(05-06-2018, 04:56 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-05-2018, 06:26 PM)JCasterlin Wrote:
(05-05-2018, 06:00 PM)Shannon Wrote: So we go through this cycle, and we catch them, and we patch them, and we rise and repeat. That's the best we can do. Eventually there will be no more holes, no more escapes, no more ways out, around, under or through except to accomplish the design goals. That's why we're at 3.2 and still going.

I'm expecting to make some important breakthroughs here in the next 2-4 months, so we shall see. But no matter what resistance tactics we encounter, we will eventually overcome and defeat them. It's just a learning process for me, as it is for you guys. But with each release, we are getting closer, better and more effective and powerful.

Shannon , is there any instructional difference in listening to a 5.5G vs a 5G or is it the same?

5.5G programs are designed using newer technologies which require use in loops, instead of hours. As Ben said, it comes out to much less time than 5G required per day. Also the secondary ASRB means you may need to take a break every so often from using the sub; DMSI 3.2 introduces this. Finally, P5 and P6 mean that the sub is running in your head for 21 or 35 days after you stop using it (depending on which is in the program) and that means you need to take a break from using subs for a while to avoid having two 5.5G subs running in your head at the same time if you want to avoid the clash.

I was referring to E2 since its 5.5G. If I'm listening to it for 8 to 12 hours a day is that too much?

E2 is "do what works for you". Some people do well at 1-2 hours a day, some people do best at 10-12. You'll know if it's too much.

There are days where I am ok only able to get maybe 2 or 3 hours in & day a where I get 10 - 12. I'm guessing that's fine as long as I'm consistent?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 05-13-2018

(05-12-2018, 02:40 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-11-2018, 08:23 PM)samba99 Wrote:
(05-11-2018, 06:24 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-11-2018, 02:10 AM)Zane Wrote: Yesterday, I played 2 Loops of DMSI A-US-Track.....Today I feel like a Vegetable. I guess I set volume too high yesterday..

Two loops a day of DMSI 3.2 is not a light workout. There's a reason I said 1 a day in the instructions.

Shannon I think DMSI is way too strong to be used everyday, speaking in terms of results..

Secondary ASRB calculations would have been a lot closer to 1:1 if that were the case for a majority of people.

The question is, are the people here who resist most, representative for the majority of people?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - anansi26 - 05-13-2018

(05-13-2018, 03:53 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(05-12-2018, 12:46 PM)anansi26 Wrote: Shannon,
Would you ever consider ditching the aura part of DMSI and just focus on everything else that would get us laid?

You do realize that the key element of DMSI achieving it's goals, has been by design, since day one, the aura, right? If it wouldn't take me days of work I know would be wasted, I would build a "c" without it and show you how preposterous the results would be.

I realize that the majority of us are using DMSI so we can have a lot of sex with one or more partners we wouldn't be able to get under normal conditions.I realize that you've put everything and the kitchen sink in this thing with mediocre results.I realize that your "models" have yet to deliver.I realize that you're a sublimal guru but it wouldn't hurt to try going about things a little differently and instead of replying "its resistance" to the negative feedback actually making real changes to the program.The reason why people are so exhausted is because theres too much shit in DMSI.We needed a house you built a backwards city.Remarkable but unneccessary.Make it gender specific ,add social skills and social proof,beef up pheromones and manifestation,instead of a morphine drip add something that makes us just feel awesome all the time and the people around us too.The very first version of DMSI had a great aura but it lacked the support needed for most to do anything with it.Then put a $300 price tag out the gate(no free upgrade)if it works raise price to $400.If it really works $500.Make one with aura one without aura.It would be preposterous(ly good)