![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 03-14-2018 (03-14-2018, 09:31 AM)Cyanide Wrote:(03-14-2018, 08:48 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: I am no longer a stonewaller. I was but now I am released from this and so i am an executer? hows that sound? as ill need to change my descrip' under my name. hahah I came on and went to other posts first and remembered I should change this and it was changed. I was so confused and thought SHIT THIS DMSI IS AMAZING hahaha thanks Cyanide!! ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 03-14-2018 (03-14-2018, 09:33 AM)Shannon Wrote:(03-14-2018, 08:48 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:(03-14-2018, 08:42 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:(03-14-2018, 08:40 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:(03-14-2018, 08:23 AM)Shannon Wrote: You're asking me what percentage of red is redder if we have more red than we have now. There's no way to answer. I have said this before several times already, but I will say it again: thank you Shannon. I think this became my reality only when (and im not in anyway blaming you) you revealed to me that what I am doing is stonewalling. It was new to me because obviously I never want to do that, im using the subs to better me not to stonewall them. What perhaps this shows is how im easily led, influenced or able for someone to maybe shape my identity perhaps. Or perhaps its showing me that if you can influence me this easily then the subs can and will work on me lol either way I know I have stonewalled but dont want to and want DMSI to definitely smash this core and all negative core beliefs down and to increase my self esteem and self worth etc too. hence why im unsure which is best for me track A or track B. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 03-14-2018 (03-14-2018, 11:31 AM)Shannon Wrote: Identifying with being a resistor, a stonewaller, etc. resists the goal in itself. But stating that you are an executor before you are is also going to trigger resistance. For now, just disconnecting the "resister" identity is the goal. ok so I am simply Me then ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 03-14-2018 Interesting idea with the blind test! Would be up for that were it not for the fact I've just started DMSI3.2 a couple of weeks ago. Might be up for some testing of this kind in the future though, as I trust Shannon's test subs are going to be primed to benefit the user anyhow. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 03-14-2018 (03-14-2018, 12:57 PM)Cyanide Wrote: Yes it's serious. We expect not much usage currently due to dmsi. However, for those who are not using dmsi and are in transition between subs may find time to try it out. sounds exciting and awesome! hope to read journals for this ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 03-14-2018 Anybody watched a movie called "the arrival"? Kinda explains the TID effect that Shannon talks about. Good movie too. Wonder if that kind of thing is possible to that scale tho RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DarkPlouf - 03-14-2018 (03-14-2018, 08:42 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:You can't really blame Jake. "resisting","stonewaling","resistor" and many other of the like are the most used words in this forum. It's like...it's becoming a standard now to expect to resist a subliminal, even a tiny part of it. Consciously or not, we are getting trained to resist subs. We hear from Shannon "if it doesn't work then that's because you resist", then from oneself: "oh no...doesn't work, I must be a resistor", and even from fellow members: "You resisted X hard | You are known to be a resistor", ect.(03-14-2018, 08:40 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:(03-14-2018, 08:23 AM)Shannon Wrote:(03-14-2018, 03:17 AM)AstonMartin Wrote: Shannon, what can you estimate about the effectiveness of H&C in 3.2A then compared to 3.1A? Notice on newcomers quickly accept "resistance" as a truth here and write in their new shiny reports that they are maybe resisting. The other day Shannon talked about how it's important for one to be focused on success instead of lack. I wanted to jump on the occasion to speak my mind but didn't want to start a drama. Then now there's another occasion for me. I think we might get into self-fulfilling prophecies about resisting. After all, whenever something doesn't work, the minds of members here go directly to "resistance". Ignoring the countless of other variables in play, why would a sub not work for a given individual. It gets even worst when "You choose to resist" is all what "resistors" hear, talking about taking responsibility (shit like that) and how its their own fault for not executing. But, Ta-da, that's how we get an individual internalizing the thought that he's a failure as a subliminal user. Yup the subconscious or whatever part of that user can see it to that extreme. The reminder from Wolverine to stop identifying oneself as a stonewaller or a resistor is a good one. Also maybe we shouldn't be so quick to jump to the conclusion that a member resists a sub when it doesn't give satisfying results. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Blink - 03-14-2018 (03-14-2018, 12:10 PM)Cyanide Wrote: Let me steal Shannon thunder for a minute and announce the release of a new experimental sub that will be hitting the shop within the next day or two. Here is the description: In. I've been off of subs for a while now. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Sterling - 03-14-2018 Shannon, here is some feedback to hopefully help improve dmsi somehow. I have about 10 specific females that I do testing on. For every dmsi versions, I'd tried to see if I have a response or not from all of them. The dmsi listening duration for each version for the 1st test is about 1-2 weeks, 2nd test is about a month, 3rd test is about 3 months. For one of my ex, here are her current results for 1st test: 2.3 - kiss given by her (I was playful and felt aura) 2.4a - massage requested by her (naked) (I was energetic and felt aura) 3.1a - no response (I was not tired from 3.1, did not feel aura and did try to seduce) 3.2b - no response (I was tired from 3.2, did not feel aura and did not try to seduce at all) I notice for myself that the earlier versions, I would have some results. However the newer versions I do not see hardly any results so far. (With two "possible" exception during 3.1. When Shannon mentioned before to listen and increase 3.1 loops until results shows. I reached 5 loops until something happen. One night I went out to club, drank 3 beers, and was seduced by a girl to dance with her, after club closed I walked away to leave from dance floor and I felt someone grab my ass and I turned around and it was the girl who seduce me to dance with her. She leaned into french kiss me. I do not know her. Two days after that day, I had already listen to 5 loops of 3.1, I was at another club already drank 3-5 beers dancing on my own. When the club closed and I was walking back to the bar, a drunk girl from the dance floor I do not know grabbed my ass! At the time, I am not sure if that was dmsi related or not since Shannon mention that alcohol and dmsi would not go together so I dismiss those two incidents from my mind until now. Shannon, if those two situations are valid dmsi events, does that mean there are exceptions to 'no alcohol while on dmsi' rule for some people? Or could it mean that some people require to feel 'relax and comfortable' [like on alcohol buzz] before executing dmsi more successfully? Could there be a module for that?) You once mention that the newer dmsi version has more power which may produce more resistance for some people. Is there a way to create a module that will accept or not fear more power? (not afraid of being overwhelmed or confused by more power) Or could it be that some people like myself have not learn how to process that much power at one time and require a different pace, repetition, or speed to process all the information the newer dmsi version has? Thanks. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Havana - 03-14-2018 Reminds of an experiment where a guy on YouTube posted a sigil for viewers to use, without disclosing its purpose. After a while it was revealed it was supposed to manifest an orange ball in the garden. And the kicker, it worked for many people. Someone even said an orange ball appeared on their balcony, seemingly out of nowhere (they lived high above ground floor). RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shadow2200 - 03-14-2018 (03-14-2018, 08:09 AM)Shannon Wrote:(03-13-2018, 05:38 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote:(03-13-2018, 03:10 AM)Shannon Wrote:(03-12-2018, 03:28 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote: Shannon, Is goal is still for the those affected by your aura to initiate things with you? Still too early to tell about this version? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - thor2014 - 03-14-2018 (03-14-2018, 08:16 AM)Shannon Wrote:(03-13-2018, 07:42 PM)lano1106 Wrote:(03-13-2018, 05:06 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: although no sex yet. But I feel like I might be close and the dam could burst at any moment. Good points Shannon. I get the feeling that a lot of the users are between the ages of 19 and 25. Either kids at still at college, living at home and are obsessed about getting laid. Or those who are at university who have never experienced the real world. University is to me was about studying, getting drunk and trying to get laid. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Determined - 03-14-2018 (03-14-2018, 09:43 PM)thor2014 Wrote:(03-14-2018, 08:16 AM)Shannon Wrote:(03-13-2018, 07:42 PM)lano1106 Wrote:(03-13-2018, 05:06 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: although no sex yet. But I feel like I might be close and the dam could burst at any moment. There's nothing wrong with getting laid. In fact chasing skirt in your 20's is optimal. I have a friend whose slept with 1000+ women and he says it's only through this process do you refine what you want in a woman. He likened sexual experience to primary school - high school - college education. It's pretty limiting for a man to be in his 30's and have only a primary school level of understanding with women due to his own inexperience. It's also pretty limiting for a guy to be making the same mistakes over and over again without learning rapidly. The faster a man goes through this process, the better able they are to achieve fulfillment and satisfaction with women. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Username - 03-14-2018 APCE_MFX_HU Somehow I feel gravitational effect towards it. Not jet sure if I'm gonna use it though. Probably let the coin toss decide it or something ![]() |