![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - myth - 12-07-2016 (12-07-2016, 10:43 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: Now I think I know what people are talking about when they say there is a beep in the track. First, I don't think there is a real beep in the track, because I heard in in the third loop, but definitely not at the first one. This seem to be some kind of thing that happens when you process the sub information. Even if it may not happen for everyone. Have had something similar on some 5G titles but not that intense. Don't remember having this with 4G or 3G. Anyway, looks like that tone gets created in your head. Could be something simpler than in-your-head. like the software player reaction to an encoding choice. For example, my player usually sees 1-2 frame issues per audio file (whether mp3 or flac), depending on the file: Playing DMSI_V3_0_1_A_Hybrid_Subliminal_(Ocean_Surf_Ultrasonic).flac. Audio only file format detected. Load subtitles in ./ ========================================================================== Opening audio decoder: [ffmpeg] FFmpeg/libavcodec audio decoders AUDIO: 44100 Hz, 2 ch, s16le, 1014.3 kbit/71.88% (ratio: 126789->176400) Selected audio codec: [ffflac] afm: ffmpeg (FFmpeg FLAC audio) ========================================================================== AO: [oss] 44100Hz 2ch s16le (2 bytes per sample) Video: no video Starting playback... A:4001.0 ( 1:06:40.9) of 4140.0 ( 1:09:00.0) 1.2% [NULL @ 0xbf53e0]sample/frame number mismatch in adjacent frames A:4139.7 ( 1:08:59.6) of 4140.0 ( 1:09:00.0) 1.2% Any chance that your player beeps at 1:06:40 in that file? Mine doesn't, but, then, it tries to hide what it doesn't like, not call attention to it. Makes a little more sense to me than multiple people deciding to hear beeps in their head. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 12-07-2016 (12-07-2016, 11:43 AM)myth Wrote:(12-07-2016, 10:43 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: Now I think I know what people are talking about when they say there is a beep in the track. First, I don't think there is a real beep in the track, because I heard in in the third loop, but definitely not at the first one. This seem to be some kind of thing that happens when you process the sub information. Even if it may not happen for everyone. Have had something similar on some 5G titles but not that intense. Don't remember having this with 4G or 3G. Anyway, looks like that tone gets created in your head. I would say this is not the case as this become a continuous high pitch beep at loop three. Started noticing it somewhere at minute eight and lasted until the end. I also "heard" it after stopping to listen. Now it almost faded away. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - sawell54 - 12-07-2016 Dumb question, if we are using DMSI primarily during sleep how do we account for the possible 90 minutes in delta that we may or may not be taking in subliminal input from the subs? I know the easy way out is to say play it when you are awake but I do not have time to consistently play the sub reliably 3 loops per day back to back during my waking hours without being interrupted, so sleep is the next viable option RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - eternity - 12-07-2016 (12-07-2016, 12:30 PM)sawell54 Wrote: Dumb question, if we are using DMSI primarily during sleep how do we account for the possible 90 minutes in delta that we may or may not be taking in subliminal input from the subs? I know the easy way out is to say play it when you are awake but I do not have time to consistently play the sub reliably 3 loops per day back to back during my waking hours without being interrupted, so sleep is the next viable option if i'm correct.... it doesn't matter what state you're in, the subliminal goes directly to the subconscious which i believe is active 24/7/365. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-07-2016 (12-07-2016, 01:11 PM)eternitys_child Wrote:(12-07-2016, 12:30 PM)sawell54 Wrote: Dumb question, if we are using DMSI primarily during sleep how do we account for the possible 90 minutes in delta that we may or may not be taking in subliminal input from the subs? I know the easy way out is to say play it when you are awake but I do not have time to consistently play the sub reliably 3 loops per day back to back during my waking hours without being interrupted, so sleep is the next viable option You may be incorrect on this one. In Delta, everything mind related seems to shut down and the body focuses on physical rejuvenation and healing. It is entirely possible that there is no data getting through during this time. It would be a fascinating experiment to see what happens when we only expose people during this state, but... of course we can't do that. To answer the OP, I don't have a good answer for you. I just know that 3 loops per day is what came out of the models. I also know that it's working like gangbusters for me when I use it sleeping. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 12-07-2016 What are you working on NOW or about to begin working on soon....MHS? GPR? I Mean which one is literally on the back burner,in que,soon to be & ready to be worked on? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-07-2016 I've decided on MHS. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - kenpachi - 12-08-2016 ... why am I a keyword :O RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-08-2016 You're just awesome like that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-08-2016 (12-07-2016, 10:55 PM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote:(12-07-2016, 10:49 PM)yeah! Wrote: Im looking forward to when Disney comes along and "likes" all these posts. It will depend on what your subconscious needs energy for and what sources of energy it chooses to use to achieve its goals. I suspect this response is due to the healing. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - jonathan4all - 12-08-2016 (12-06-2016, 06:27 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-06-2016, 06:20 AM)jonathan4all Wrote:(12-06-2016, 06:14 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-06-2016, 05:52 AM)jonathan4all Wrote: Shannon when are you planning to built MLS 5.5g? Will it be the one after you have opened poll for or you will finish all of them and then build MLS 5.5G ? If so how long will you think approximately? I am asking this if it is more than 6 months then I will try another round of BASE rather waiting. Really appreciate your feedback. LTU and EHPRA 2.0 SPECIALLY RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 12-08-2016 Hey Shannon! Can we do any kind of affirmations while on DMSI? If not, is there any kind of meditation or ritual we can do to pro-actively let go of the past regarding girls? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 12-08-2016 (12-08-2016, 03:08 AM)kenpachi Wrote: ... why am I a keyword :O Zaraki Kenpachi from Bleach. I thought that was why you chose your username. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - jonathan4all - 12-08-2016 (12-08-2016, 05:44 AM)maxx55 Wrote: Hey Shannon! no mind programming affirmation, meditation, binaural beat , nlp, hypnotism . I have been meditating for last 5 years. I am sad bit that I gotta stop it soon with this new technology. |