+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 12-06-2016
5 days on V3.01 and i can't remeber any dream i had, they were all intense but i the moment i wake up the memory vanishes...
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - eternity - 12-06-2016
i had a dream 2 nights ago that i was getting extremely sensual with a white woman. made her orgasm to the extreme, but the favor wasn't returned -_- but the dream was so vivid, i could feel the goosebumps on her legs.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 12-06-2016
(12-06-2016, 09:28 AM)eternitys_child Wrote: i had a dream 2 nights ago that i was getting extremely sensual with a white woman. made her orgasm to the extreme, but the favor wasn't returned -_- but the dream was so vivid, i could feel the goosebumps on her legs.
Seriously love your avatar
my turn...
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - eternity - 12-06-2016
(12-06-2016, 09:40 AM)Illumi Wrote:(12-06-2016, 09:28 AM)eternitys_child Wrote: i had a dream 2 nights ago that i was getting extremely sensual with a white woman. made her orgasm to the extreme, but the favor wasn't returned -_- but the dream was so vivid, i could feel the goosebumps on her legs.
Seriously love your avatar
Inspired by (I'm hoping gifs work on this forum)
![[Image: tumblr_n2wjpd3DzT1tnzbaxo1_400.gif]](https://37.media.tumblr.com/7ac3281eea50f52824e5370e8ac6fc92/tumblr_n2wjpd3DzT1tnzbaxo1_400.gif)
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - changer - 12-06-2016
(12-06-2016, 10:00 AM)eternitys_child Wrote:(12-06-2016, 09:40 AM)Illumi Wrote:(12-06-2016, 09:28 AM)eternitys_child Wrote: i had a dream 2 nights ago that i was getting extremely sensual with a white woman. made her orgasm to the extreme, but the favor wasn't returned -_- but the dream was so vivid, i could feel the goosebumps on her legs.
Seriously love your avatar
Inspired by (I'm hoping gifs work on this forum)
I loved Pingu when I was a child. And maybe still do haha
![[Image: tumblr_mso6yhq8wy1qbchsgo1_250.gif]](https://25.media.tumblr.com/f418201b6c2e7b9458598ca46b6c7c35/tumblr_mso6yhq8wy1qbchsgo1_250.gif)
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - eternity - 12-06-2016
(12-06-2016, 10:38 AM)changer Wrote:(12-06-2016, 10:00 AM)eternitys_child Wrote:(12-06-2016, 09:40 AM)Illumi Wrote:(12-06-2016, 09:28 AM)eternitys_child Wrote: i had a dream 2 nights ago that i was getting extremely sensual with a white woman. made her orgasm to the extreme, but the favor wasn't returned -_- but the dream was so vivid, i could feel the goosebumps on her legs.
Seriously love your avatar
Inspired by (I'm hoping gifs work on this forum)
I loved Pingu when I was a child. And maybe still do haha
embrace your inner child changer!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JakeKennedy - 12-06-2016
RE: Shannon's Journal, Volume 2
I have determined through my models that I am going to be implementing, most likely starting with V 3.1 of DMSI (or whatever program I build before that) scripting that will cause you to automatically adjust the amount of time you listen to a program to be whatever is optimal for you. Looking forward to this.
*****************
Love this! I am going to stick to the recommended 3 back to back daily loop of DMSI 3.0.1A but I have a strong suspicion my optimal may be more than 3 daily plays of the track.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-06-2016
(12-06-2016, 11:08 AM)JakeKennedy Wrote: RE: Shannon's Journal, Volume 2
I have determined through my models that I am going to be implementing, most likely starting with V 3.1 of DMSI (or whatever program I build before that) scripting that will cause you to automatically adjust the amount of time you listen to a program to be whatever is optimal for you. Looking forward to this.
*****************
Love this! I am going to stick to the recommended 3 back to back daily loop of DMSI 3.0.1A but I have a strong suspicion my optimal may be more than 3 daily plays of the track.
More than once, I have found myself wanting to listen to it more than 3 loops a day also. I suspect this has to do with the euphoria. The goal is to show me what is happening, not encourage people to use it more. I will eventually be removing the euphoria effect.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shadow2200 - 12-06-2016
(12-06-2016, 11:39 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-06-2016, 11:08 AM)JakeKennedy Wrote: RE: Shannon's Journal, Volume 2
I have determined through my models that I am going to be implementing, most likely starting with V 3.1 of DMSI (or whatever program I build before that) scripting that will cause you to automatically adjust the amount of time you listen to a program to be whatever is optimal for you. Looking forward to this.
*****************
Love this! I am going to stick to the recommended 3 back to back daily loop of DMSI 3.0.1A but I have a strong suspicion my optimal may be more than 3 daily plays of the track.
More than once, I have found myself wanting to listen to it more than 3 loops a day also. I suspect this has to do with the euphoria. The goal is to show me what is happening, not encourage people to use it more. I will eventually be removing the euphoria effect.
No wonder why i'm feeling so good while listening to it. Be nice if it stayed.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-06-2016
(12-06-2016, 11:53 AM)Shadow2200 Wrote:(12-06-2016, 11:39 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-06-2016, 11:08 AM)JakeKennedy Wrote: RE: Shannon's Journal, Volume 2
I have determined through my models that I am going to be implementing, most likely starting with V 3.1 of DMSI (or whatever program I build before that) scripting that will cause you to automatically adjust the amount of time you listen to a program to be whatever is optimal for you. Looking forward to this.
*****************
Love this! I am going to stick to the recommended 3 back to back daily loop of DMSI 3.0.1A but I have a strong suspicion my optimal may be more than 3 daily plays of the track.
More than once, I have found myself wanting to listen to it more than 3 loops a day also. I suspect this has to do with the euphoria. The goal is to show me what is happening, not encourage people to use it more. I will eventually be removing the euphoria effect.
No wonder why i'm feeling so good while listening to it. Be nice if it stayed.
Once it has done its job, it will be disabled.
I may release a version of stress relief with it present though.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - D77 - 12-06-2016
(12-06-2016, 11:39 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-06-2016, 11:08 AM)JakeKennedy Wrote: RE: Shannon's Journal, Volume 2
I have determined through my models that I am going to be implementing, most likely starting with V 3.1 of DMSI (or whatever program I build before that) scripting that will cause you to automatically adjust the amount of time you listen to a program to be whatever is optimal for you. Looking forward to this.
*****************
Love this! I am going to stick to the recommended 3 back to back daily loop of DMSI 3.0.1A but I have a strong suspicion my optimal may be more than 3 daily plays of the track.
More than once, I have found myself wanting to listen to it more than 3 loops a day also. I suspect this has to do with the euphoria. The goal is to show me what is happening, not encourage people to use it more. I will eventually be removing the euphoria effect.
Bro,
According to my research, the euphoria effect that we have here is essentially important with regards to manifestation. Monks I believe from China/Tibet that is practicing manifestation meditation was very at awe and surprise that one scientist from the west just use an Isochronic tones to achieve this state in the brain, they commented they need to meditate for so many years in order to achieve this state in the brain easily, I believe yours is much more potent. The monks is very impress by this. The great masters of the past have access to this while bending reality along the way.
Please don't do this, for the sake of me and others. I don't have that info that I can link to you but the info has stuck to me so much and many years that I need to tell you this. That is why before I stumbled upon your product I needed to meditate for at least 30 mins or more just to achieve this state, but did I really achieve the state? then do my manifestation meditation and yet yours is so much more than I can do. There are people who won't listen, just think of me and others that listen.. consider us.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-06-2016
(12-06-2016, 12:17 PM)D77 Wrote:(12-06-2016, 11:39 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-06-2016, 11:08 AM)JakeKennedy Wrote: RE: Shannon's Journal, Volume 2
I have determined through my models that I am going to be implementing, most likely starting with V 3.1 of DMSI (or whatever program I build before that) scripting that will cause you to automatically adjust the amount of time you listen to a program to be whatever is optimal for you. Looking forward to this.
*****************
Love this! I am going to stick to the recommended 3 back to back daily loop of DMSI 3.0.1A but I have a strong suspicion my optimal may be more than 3 daily plays of the track.
More than once, I have found myself wanting to listen to it more than 3 loops a day also. I suspect this has to do with the euphoria. The goal is to show me what is happening, not encourage people to use it more. I will eventually be removing the euphoria effect.
Bro,
According to my research, the euphoria effect that we have here is essentially important with regards to manifestation. Monks I believe from China/Tibet that is practicing manifestation meditation was very at awe and surprise that one scientist from the west just use an Isochronic tones to achieve this state in the brain, they commented they need to meditate for so many years in order to achieve this state in the brain easily, I believe yours is much more potent. The monks is very impress by this. The great masters of the past have access to this while bending reality along the way.
Please don't do this, for the sake of me and others. I don't have that info that I can link to you but the info has stuck to me so much and many years that I need to tell you this. That is why before I stumbled upon your product I needed to meditate for at least 30 mins or more just to achieve this state, but did I really achieve the state? then do my manifestation meditation and yet yours is so much more than I can do. There are people who won't listen, just think of me and others that listen.. consider us.
You're comparing apples to asteroids. My manifestation methods do not require or use any euphoria to work, or any specific state shifting. They operate entirely at the subconscious level, and entirely automatically.
The euphoria effect is being triggered as a scripted response to performing a specific action that I otherwise cannot see, which has very little to do with manifestation. It will be fine without this.
If you don;t want to use my programs without it, then you are only reinforcing the reasons I will be removing it in the first place: it is a distraction from the real reasons you should be using the program.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 12-06-2016
@Shannon
Had a few questions/thoughts during my DMSI loop, would like to ask:
I get the role of healing/clearing is to remove the blockade of crap that is preventing us from achieving the goals of DMSI.
In regards to the subs you'll continue to improve and develop, what if there's a way of getting to the destination without:
a) Healing/Clearing the obstacles whatever they may be
b) Going straight on head first through it all
So you're getting from A >> C without going through B, B = representing the blocks.
Simply disassociating / disconnecting rendering whatever crap that is in the way useless, so it no longer is in the way, an off switch, removing B from the equation without confrontation?
I am aware this may not be suited for the long run as the garbage may still be present but as long as it's not in the way ?
It crossed my mind because I was thinking about how I felt on the subs right from v1 to 2.5, 2.5 almost felt like an off switch like there was no garbage and crap there, so is the disconnecting already in use in that sub or is it just trying to achieve while it's present.
I know what I am saying sounds the same but implementing some kind of statement that STOPS the obstacles from preventing success.
V3 is going well so far, but I say this because, let's be honest, eventually, we want to achieve the goals as quickly as possibly but at the same time we are unaware of how long the clearing and healing will require?
I remember you mentioned in the past that there are layers to the subconscious mind, have you researched or attempted to direct a statement specifically at the 'Soul' to see what that results in?
Would targeting the soul impact the all the layers of the subconscious we need superuser access?
![[Image: DMSI.png]](https://s11.postimg.org/7zbipf5r7/DMSI.png)
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 12-06-2016
What's wrong with euphoria exactly? A little bit of fun shouldn't be a problem I guess.
I like the asteroid apple comparison