![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-03-2016 (12-02-2016, 02:36 PM)spiritman Wrote: Quick question, I plan on using the Hybrid Trickling Stream Ultrasonic mp3 file. Is it safe to use headphones with this file? About the volume, do I just put it at a comfortable level? http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-8249.html RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-03-2016 (12-02-2016, 07:10 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote:(12-01-2016, 09:35 PM)Shannon Wrote:In case you forget Shannon(12-01-2016, 09:15 PM)Have at ye Wrote:(12-01-2016, 09:11 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote:(12-01-2016, 09:01 PM)Steven Wrote: I'm embarrassed to say this but I don't know how to check against the md5 hashes. I don't know what to look for or how interpret them or what to compare them to.Same here. Maybe Shannon can put a sticky somewhere. I made a sticky thread in the FAQ section. The MD5 hash values are useful in two cases. 1. You get your copy of my subs from a source other than IML or directly from me personally - which of course means you're probably pirating them, and you don;t know if they've been tampered with. An MD5 sum hash will prove mathematically if they are tampered with or not. 2. You want to verify that an audio file you got from IML downloaded without errors. 3. You want to verify file length. It is extremely unlikely that you got a bad download, but it can and does happen. It is also a way to know whether the files on the server have become corrupt. If there is an error in the file as a result of download, you will usually see that your player cannot open the file or refuses to play it. If it plays, it will most likely only have an audio glitch contained within a single second of audio. Regardless, only a file that passes the hash check is for sure safe to use, as only such a file is absolutely certainly what I created it to be. If you haven't been checking, and have experienced no audio glitches, it is very unlikely that you have used my subs in vain. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-03-2016 (12-02-2016, 07:26 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: actually never mind i learned how to do this on a mac. The values are calculated by a MD5 sum hash program that calculates all files values and outputs them, automatically. I just copy and paste its output. What you describe is mathematically impossible unless there is a serious bug in the program used to calculate them. I have never had this issue before, and since it is a cryptographic function, it seems extremely unlikely that there would exist such a bug in the md5sum hash calculator. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-03-2016 (12-02-2016, 07:30 PM)eternitys_child Wrote: I didn't feel any sort of euphoria or morphine drip from 3.0.1a. Does that mean I'm not executing the script? It would suggest that you're not executing the euphoria section of scripting, at the least. Direct resistance is correlating more and more with headaches, while execution should correlate with euphoria, or at least a sensation pf pleasantness. To me, the sensation is much like a cross between morphine and a full body massage. If you get neither effect (headache nor pleasure) this suggests that you may be stonewalling the script. Are you seeing any other results? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-03-2016 (12-02-2016, 08:56 PM)alphabeta35 Wrote: hi Ben/Shannon Thanks for the heads up. We have it under control. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Weichi - 12-03-2016 (12-03-2016, 12:44 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-02-2016, 07:26 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: actually never mind i learned how to do this on a mac. I think that on a Linux type system the hash is outputed before the name of the file while on Mac it's first the name of the file and after that the hash sum. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AbundanceCH - 12-03-2016 (12-03-2016, 12:44 AM)Shannon Wrote:Something is wrong then here's the proof. To the right highlighted on the txt file are the hd5 values for the flac and mp3 for stage 6. They are backwards or am i reading this wrong?(12-02-2016, 07:26 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: actually never mind i learned how to do this on a mac. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Weichi - 12-03-2016 (12-03-2016, 02:30 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote:(12-03-2016, 12:44 AM)Shannon Wrote:Something is wrong then here's the proof. To the right highlighted on the txt file are the hd5 values for the flac and mp3 for stage 6. They are backwards or am i reading this wrong?(12-02-2016, 07:26 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: actually never mind i learned how to do this on a mac. In Shannon's file the hash sum is before file name while on your terminal the hash sum is after so the file is good. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 12-03-2016 (12-03-2016, 12:21 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-02-2016, 09:37 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon, Alright, so if I'm having panic attacks, would it heal and clear the causes of the panic attacks since they would be a hindrance in achieving the goals of the program? If that's the case it may be a better fit for me than E2, since with the enhanced technology it is faster and more powerful. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Catman - 12-03-2016 (12-03-2016, 03:43 AM)robstar Wrote: Alright, so if I'm having panic attacks, would it heal and clear the causes of the panic attacks since they would be a hindrance in achieving the goals of the program? If that's the case it may be a better fit for me than E2, since with the enhanced technology it is faster and more powerful. Only if they're directed related to women/sex etc. I suspect. However, I can comment on panic attacks themselves relating to subs. My brother suffers from them badly, and has Lorazepam on hand when I take him out in case the panic attacks (paranoia) set in. I've had him running E2 for a little over 2 months now, and two weekends in a row now the last two times, no Lorazepam used!!! ![]() E2 is tailor made for dealing with that kind of thing. I'd recommend E2 over anything else. It gets the job done for that, period. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 12-03-2016 (12-03-2016, 03:49 AM)CatMan Wrote:(12-03-2016, 03:43 AM)robstar Wrote: Alright, so if I'm having panic attacks, would it heal and clear the causes of the panic attacks since they would be a hindrance in achieving the goals of the program? If that's the case it may be a better fit for me than E2, since with the enhanced technology it is faster and more powerful. I don't think they are related to women/sex, but Shannon said anything that would interfere with the goals of the program. They definitely interfere because they make me barely want to leave the house, and hinder my ability to socialise. I know E2 is great, I've been on it two weeks now, but hey, if there is any chance DMSI could also help with this, I'd rather run it! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Catman - 12-03-2016 (12-03-2016, 03:54 AM)robstar Wrote:(12-03-2016, 03:49 AM)CatMan Wrote:(12-03-2016, 03:43 AM)robstar Wrote: Alright, so if I'm having panic attacks, would it heal and clear the causes of the panic attacks since they would be a hindrance in achieving the goals of the program? If that's the case it may be a better fit for me than E2, since with the enhanced technology it is faster and more powerful. I don't think they are, either. I can tell you're trying to run it and rationalising a reason to jump to it. That's why I posted to help you see you have the golden ticket in your hands already, bud. I'm just saying what works, and I've seen it first hand, to get rid of your issues. Ultimately it's your choice, just trying to help you make the right choice for panic attacks (paranoia). My previous post is an amazing testimony of E2, proof of it clearly removing very serious entrenched panic attacks (paranoia) after only 2 months of listening and I'm sure most people don't have them as bad as my brother does or DID perhaps is more accurate of the two at this point. If that doesn't sway you, then fair enough. Panic attacks (paranoia) will ruin everything and it can happen at any time seemingly out of nowhere. I've seen first hand how much of life that panic attacks (paranoia) rob from you and those around you. I hope you get them sorted. I know you want DMSI...it's the flavour of the month. I was just speaking about proof I've witnessed about E2 removing VERY VERY serious panic attacks (paranoia) after 2 months of listening that either require reliance on medication to control or hospitalisation...to tell you E2 is very effective at dealing with them. I'm supremely impressed so far with his run on E2, if it works for HIS panic attacks (paranoia), I'd wager they'd work for anyone's! Hopefully for you, Shannon will tell you the answer you wish to hear...If not, the good news is, you already have an amazing program that is able to remove these panic attacks (paranoia) in time. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - 4Kingdoms - 12-03-2016 (12-03-2016, 04:56 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: Shannon, subliminal text and visual subliminal (images, photos, etc.) http://www.businessballs.com/vaklearningstylestest.htm vak - visual, auditory, kinesthetic - learning styles model and free self-test Have you ever taken this test? Teacher's use it to find out the best way a child absorbs information that is being taught to them. Since you are drawn to the visual, you are probably a visual person. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - 4Kingdoms - 12-03-2016 (12-03-2016, 08:16 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: Hmm. Great. I have been test myself like this before. I were visual. 50 percents visual 30 percents kinesthetic and twenty percent auditory. (12-03-2016, 08:17 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: I am just wonder about subliminal that flashes the text and images. That would be considered visual because you are using your eyes to read the text. Is it more effective than Shannon's subliminals? Probably not. Is it effective for you? Probably so because you are a visual person. |