(12-01-2016, 11:26 AM)Travis Wrote: Can someone help a brother out and explain what this Hybrid track is? I have read through these pages and still do not understand.

Is it a mixture of Ultrasonic + Masked? Does this make it 2x as powerful?

(12-01-2016, 11:29 AM)eternitys_child Wrote: Shannon, since there's no ASRB, does that mean we don't need to listen to the 3 loops back to back to back? Or has the technology evolved beyond that, to where we need all three loops in one session?

(12-01-2016, 11:33 AM)Duke.Togo Wrote:

(12-01-2016, 11:29 AM)eternitys_child Wrote: Shannon, since there's no ASRB, does that mean we don't need to listen to the 3 loops back to back to back? Or has the technology evolved beyond that, to where we need all three loops in one session?

I believe there is an ASRB. The first time Shannon compiled the script, there were errors.

The optimal number of loops will need to be listened to back to back.

(12-01-2016, 11:37 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:

(12-01-2016, 11:33 AM)Duke.Togo Wrote:

(12-01-2016, 11:29 AM)eternitys_child Wrote: Shannon, since there's no ASRB, does that mean we don't need to listen to the 3 loops back to back to back? Or has the technology evolved beyond that, to where we need all three loops in one session?

I believe there is an ASRB. The first time Shannon compiled the script, there were errors.

The optimal number of loops will need to be listened to back to back.

Yes, there is one (20:3 if I remember correctly for version A). The one with no ASRB was that one with the script error.

(12-01-2016, 11:55 AM)Travis Wrote: Anyone else notice v2.5 kick in hard after they stopped? I've been off it for 8 days now and I have felt my power increasing! Wtf? Been manifesting some nice girls without thinking about it.

Since stopping just 8 days ago, I feel a strong positive difference in myself.

(12-01-2016, 08:19 AM)AriGold Wrote: I don't know what exactly that blockage is. It's just that the program did not get a result within 10 months.

(12-01-2016, 10:07 AM)RTBoss Wrote:

(12-01-2016, 06:40 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-01-2016, 05:53 AM)RTBoss Wrote: Regarding alcohol not being physically addictive, I must heartily disagree. I used to work in a hospital during college. My job was to sit with patients who were a danger to themselves. Many were alcoholics going through detox. The physical symptoms of withdrawal can be so nasty it can literally kill you. I've been with people who have had no idea who they are, where they were, or unable to construct a coherent sentence because their brains were no longer getting the fuel (poison) it had adapted to. DTS, delirium tremens, is nooooo joke.

Physical addiction, and dosage dependent withdrawal, are hardly the same thing.

When you drink heavily and regularly, you can cause your body to become screwed up and it will require a slow decrease in alcohol consumption to back out of that situation. But that has nothing to do with physical addiction. It's a situation in which you cannot change the body chemistry too radically in too short a period of time without causing imbalances. Push it far enough and those imbalances can result in death - but it is a case where there is a requirement for slow removal of the toxin (alcohol), nothing more.

Go from drinking nothing ever to downing a 20 ounce bottle of liquor and see if that doesn't kill you just as effectively as suddenly and completely stopping a hard drinking long term drinker will. Both are the same situation: they are both a state of too much change for the body to deal with in too short a time.

Alcohol is not physically addictive. It can only be psychologically addictive. And it's misunderstandings like this one that perpetuate these ideas.

So what you're saying is this?
http://https://www.drugabuse.gov/publications/principles-drug-addiction-treatment-research-based-guide-third-edition/frequently-asked-questions/there-difference-between-physical-dependence

(12-01-2016, 10:21 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: Personally, I dont believe subliminals or our subconscious mind can affect people and cause them to do things. Like with DMSI, I dont think we can cause our subconscious to make them want to have sex with us and make them initiate. I dont believe the subconscious has that capacity. But what I do know is with subliminals, you can make yourself better and by making yourself better suddenly women will naturally want to have sex with you & will like you. The subconscious can make our energy, auras, emotions ( feelings )& chakras so compelling, so attractive, so powerful, magnetic that we are naturally perceived as the the sexiest & most likeable people around. By changing ourselves, we can get the external results we desire. But I don't believe DMSI trying to change the response of women ( the external ) will succeed. Though, DMSI causes a change in the aura which is good. I like the original DAOS more than DMSI but it focuses on changing the self. That's just my opinion, I could be wrong but I dont think so.