![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 12-01-2016 Based on Ben's usage patterns, don't expect the files to be linked for about 10-11 hours from now. It's just after 1AM where he's at, and his last login was about 30 minutes ago (yes, I'm stalking you Benny boy!). RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - 4Kingdoms - 12-01-2016 (12-01-2016, 05:34 AM)Shannon Wrote: Oh, I will reiterate one more time... I strongly recommend that everybody do a MINIMUM of 1 week of A (and preferably 4) before using B. Do NOT recommend trying to use them both in a single day. Use each for a week at a time, minimum. (12-01-2016, 05:50 AM)Aventus45 Wrote: So the B version is going to be the unicorn of the two? Shannon answered that above your question. (Alternate Weekly) RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 12-01-2016 3 loops of 3.0.1A will work out to 69x3 = 207mins which is 3hours 27mins, don't think I can keep earphones in for that long, it can get annoying even for a trickle stream lover, but hybrid is more power!!! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-01-2016 (12-01-2016, 05:53 AM)RTBoss Wrote: Regarding alcohol not being physically addictive, I must heartily disagree. I used to work in a hospital during college. My job was to sit with patients who were a danger to themselves. Many were alcoholics going through detox. The physical symptoms of withdrawal can be so nasty it can literally kill you. I've been with people who have had no idea who they are, where they were, or unable to construct a coherent sentence because their brains were no longer getting the fuel (poison) it had adapted to. DTS, delirium tremens, is nooooo joke. Physical addiction, and dosage dependent withdrawal, are hardly the same thing. When you drink heavily and regularly, you can cause your body to become screwed up and it will require a slow decrease in alcohol consumption to back out of that situation. But that has nothing to do with physical addiction. It's a situation in which you cannot change the body chemistry too radically in too short a period of time without causing imbalances. Push it far enough and those imbalances can result in death - but it is a case where there is a requirement for slow removal of the toxin (alcohol), nothing more. Go from drinking nothing ever to downing a 20 ounce bottle of liquor and see if that doesn't kill you just as effectively as suddenly and completely stopping a hard drinking long term drinker will. Both are the same situation: they are both a state of too much change for the body to deal with in too short a time. Alcohol is not physically addictive. It can only be psychologically addictive. And it's misunderstandings like this one that perpetuate these ideas. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-01-2016 (12-01-2016, 06:27 AM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: Shannon, That no longer applies. It referred to a previous version of the AP code which is no longer in use, and which was discovered to be somehow missing the code to execute that part. Which is why we now have this new AP code, which will have teeth. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 12-01-2016 (12-01-2016, 06:27 AM)dweller94 Wrote: 3 loops of 3.0.1A will work out to 69x3 = 207mins which is 3 hours 45 mins, don't think I can keep earphones in for that long, it can get annoying even for a trickle stream lover, but hybrid is more power!!! To me it's more the earphone annoyance than the sound itself. When I hear the same sound for a long time period my brain no longer acknowledge that sound as relevant so I no longer notice it. 3 hours 45m is a new record though. Now I'm hesitating for the non healing version as there is not a much loop to do. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 12-01-2016 (12-01-2016, 06:43 AM)Alpha360 Wrote:(12-01-2016, 06:27 AM)dweller94 Wrote: 3 loops of 3.0.1A will work out to 69x3 = 207mins which is 3 hours 45 mins, don't think I can keep earphones in for that long, it can get annoying even for a trickle stream lover, but hybrid is more power!!! Yeah forgot to mention the earphone annoyance, I was hoping for one loop lol, we got three. Get those heals in man, it'll go a long way for all of us! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-01-2016 You get what the models tell me is the best option. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 12-01-2016 (12-01-2016, 06:27 AM)dweller94 Wrote: 3 loops of 3.0.1A will work out to 69x3 = 207mins which is 3 hours 45 mins, don't think I can keep earphones in for that long, it can get annoying even for a trickle stream lover, but hybrid is more power!!! Did I miss something? Are earphones necessary for the hybrid? PS 207 = 3 hours and 27 minutes. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - eternity - 12-01-2016 (11-30-2016, 09:35 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-30-2016, 09:31 PM)robstar Wrote:(11-30-2016, 08:28 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-30-2016, 08:11 PM)Dutchman610 Wrote:(11-30-2016, 06:16 PM)Shannon Wrote: Stop Smoking is currently in a single stage format. Originally it was a six stage format.O Shannon, while we have disagreed about addiction in the past, I've learned over time that you were definitely right about a lot of things. I'm replying to this post since it's somewhat relevant. I know you are busy with a whole bunch of more important things, but do you think you can describe what you mean when you say alcoholism isn't an addiction? I combated drug addiction and alcoholism for 10 years, and finally got sober on thanksgiving day 2014. (Nov 27 marked my 2 years of being completely substance free, and that was no small feat!!!!!) I also quit nicotine Nov 2015 so I have 1 year free of that addiction. I do agree that alcoholism and cigarette addiction are NOT the same thing, so I guess we're just referring to an issue of semantics when I say my addiction to alcohol was an addiction. And for the record, I'm 100% your subs had a HUGE impact on the rapid development of me from the inside out. Between am6, OF5G and E2, and other outside help that I have sought, I went from being the black sheep of society to a highly respected member of society. You have really helped change my life Shannon, to a magnitude you wouldnt be able to fathom unless you knew the before and after versions of me. And for that I express my deepest gratitude for you and your work, and for what you contribute to this world. EDIT : never mind I jumped the gun and didn't see that you already wrote a detailed response. I heavily disagree with what you say about alcoholism, but we can agree to disagree on that. I wonder if "alcohol is not physically addictive" is a statement with a different meaning? of semantics? Delerium tremens is a thing. I have experienced it. I've seen people seize out in front of me from not detoxing properly. One guy busted his head on the concrete from an alcohol withdrawal induced seizure. If that doesn't constitute as physical addiction, I'm at a loss for words and the comprehension of the subject has gone way beyond my understanding Double edit: just thoroughly read that you described my first edit in a previous post. Well, my beliefs about the subject are quite certainly heavily influenced by personal experience. That being said, Shannon, though being a master in the field of the human mind, understanding of a subject like this would be vastly different between someone like you, being on the outside looking in, vs me, being on the inside looking out. Kind of like cancer. I know you've beaten it. Only you know, first hand, all of what it entails. Even if I learned all about it, the science, the medicine, the bodys reaction to it.... not having the actuak experience of having cancer and beating it would leave a little hole in my comprehension of the subject compared to you, who knows the science, medicine, body's reaction to it, ALONG with first hand experience of it. Regardless, I'm sure the discussion we can get into about this can take up a lot of time and we all just want dmsi out already ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 12-01-2016 (12-01-2016, 07:20 AM)robstar Wrote:(12-01-2016, 06:27 AM)dweller94 Wrote: 3 loops of 3.0.1A will work out to 69x3 = 207mins which is 3 hours 45 mins, don't think I can keep earphones in for that long, it can get annoying even for a trickle stream lover, but hybrid is more power!!! No, you can play the hybrid on speakers as long as minimum output is 20khz, I wanted to use hybrid with earphones only for max impact lol My bad 3 hours 27mins, where did I get the 45 from.. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - freerad98 - 12-01-2016 (12-01-2016, 07:31 AM)dweller94 Wrote: ..snip RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 12-01-2016 (12-01-2016, 07:43 AM)freerad98 Wrote:(12-01-2016, 07:31 AM)dweller94 Wrote: ..snip When you divide by 100 hahaha I need to sleep. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AriGold - 12-01-2016 Hey Shannon, if something is blocking me to attract my perfect xy, what program would be best to release the blockage? How long do I have to use the program? How will I know when the blockage is removed without using AYP for 8 months again to find myself at the same blockage? |