![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 01-29-2016 (01-29-2016, 08:18 AM)coldfact Wrote: Bought OGSF. @Shannon - nothing jumps out at me in the write-up... would OGSF get rid of reasonable fears as well? I mean, I don't want to be so fearless that I pick fights with bouncers or pet sharks!! The program script is designed to transfer the job of keeping you safe to your cognitive thinking mind, instead of your irrational and instinctual emotional self. It says that in the description, I believe. But it's designed to help you overcome and outgrow ALL fears. Even the fear that you're not capable of thinking well enough to avoid a fight when it would be undesirable, if you have no fear. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - cfact - 01-29-2016 Thanks Shannon - your explanation makes sense - yes, I read that in the description - but wasn't sure what it meant and just wanted to confirm that the program won't make me recklessly fearless! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 01-29-2016 (01-29-2016, 07:04 AM)Shannon Wrote: One thing I believe AM needs in the next version is to have the lead in to SM removed. The next version is going to be 100% focus on AM, and nothing else. Not socializing, not females, AM. Socializing and SM Lead-In were for sure great ideas, but looking back I am wondering if this could be the reason why many people had so great results with SM and WM after doing AM5 but not with AM6. Because AM5 was pure AM, and maybe the people had better foundation there. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 01-29-2016 AM5 had the lead in too. If they had better results from AM5 then they were almost certainly resisting hard on AM6 because it was pushing them to grow more than they could deal with. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ffaux - 01-29-2016 (01-29-2016, 07:04 AM)Shannon Wrote: The next version is going to be 100% focus on AM, and nothing else. Not socializing, not females, AM. Based on my personal experience I think this would be a partial mistake. I think the internal beliefs around these topics would need to change to deal with self-image and insecurities that listeners might perceive as making them not alpha male. E.g. overcoming insecurities about being attractive to women, or overcoming insecurities about social status, or overcoming the self-image as being unpopular/uncool/etc. I'm conflicted about the idea of removing socialising because I believe a wide social circle is important for mental health and status. And thinking about where I was when I started and where some people seem to be when they come to IML perhaps leaving out the social aspects would focus the program to their (my) overall detriment. But all of this I'm saying from the perspective of still caring about social status and external validation so I'm not sure how things look from the other side. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dzemoo - 01-29-2016 (01-29-2016, 01:30 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: FrostedFake I think the result you get is more due to your personality that the product itself. alpha gets it, i like the idea RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 01-29-2016 Dzmoo, if the first three stages were shit for you, they did something good for your life because they would only have been shot because you were dealing with stuff that was needing to be dealt with, which is frequently not a fun thing to deal with. That's partly why I created the program. But I never said I was going to remove socializing. I said the focus would be on AM only. Which is to say, whatever leads to becoming an alpha, is what it would focus on. Some aspects of socializing need to be dealt with, but I want it to be a natural outgrowth of the focus of the program, not an effort going from the outside in. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Catman - 01-29-2016 Hence why SM3 was awful for me, and I was exhausted/depressed most of the time...makes complete sense. If a subject is one where you need A LOT of work, then it will likely be a bumpy ride until the script starts being internalised. I've said that to people so many times, Shannon. Hopefully you'll have greater effect. I think guys need to either give the programs, themselves, or both, more credit. We're making massive progress here with these, guys. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Catman - 01-29-2016 "Only AM6" haha, it's still amazing. Honestly dude, he barely knows what he can do with 6G. It'll be awhile before even ASC 6G is reality, never mind a massive program like AM7, which is only conceptual at this point. AM6 is insane. I'm more of the opinion it's fear itself holding back magnet results. That's written about in the FAQ in fact about why guys tend to fail on a magnet as well. Running OF5G for like 192 days, and then rerunning AM6 should make you MORE than capable of getting epic results from a magnet. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Spareness - 01-29-2016 (01-29-2016, 01:30 AM)Alpha360 Wrote: FrostedFake I think the result you get is more due to your personality that the product itself. It really explain what is in my mind. I've wondered for a long time LOL. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - sushi521 - 01-29-2016 (01-29-2016, 10:07 AM)Shannon Wrote:(01-29-2016, 08:18 AM)coldfact Wrote: Bought OGSF. @Shannon - nothing jumps out at me in the write-up... would OGSF get rid of reasonable fears as well? I mean, I don't want to be so fearless that I pick fights with bouncers or pet sharks!! Hi, I just have a question. If all fears are gone, what about the fight of flight response induced by fear that gives you extra energy to react when in dangerous situation? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 01-29-2016 (01-29-2016, 12:25 PM)Shannon Wrote: AM5 had the lead in too. If they had better results from AM5 then they were almost certainly resisting hard on AM6 because it was pushing them to grow more than they could deal with. I didn't know. I thought AM5 has just AoS inside. Will AoS be also removed? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Blink - 01-29-2016 (01-29-2016, 07:04 AM)Shannon Wrote: One thing I believe AM needs in the next version is to have the lead in to SM removed. The next version is going to be 100% focus on AM, and nothing else. Not socializing, not females, AM. Great idea! But maybe have these extra stuff as add-ons? Or different versions of the program? I would go for the plain one. But it seems some of us like to still have them in there. Just a thought. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Spiritman - 01-29-2016 (01-29-2016, 03:11 PM)sushi521 Wrote: Hi, I just have a question. If all fears are gone, what about the fight of flight response induced by fear that gives you extra energy to react when in dangerous situation? That is an inborn trait, which will always be there no matter what. |