+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-27-2016
I'm developing a fragrance right now called Sexual Chocolate for just that purpose. Believe it.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 11-27-2016
How is the male and female voice going to affect the listener ?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-27-2016
(11-27-2016, 08:38 PM)James Bond Wrote: How is the male and female voice going to affect the listener ?
The same as it always has.
Having both gender voices has a dual enhancing effect. It's more people perceived, which can have a slight peer pressure effect, and it's also an opportunity to have the instructions given in whichever gender you best respond to. It also doubles the amount of input, and allows for interesting stereophonic effects that force the brain to work more efficiently.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 11-27-2016
Relevant question do all 5G have both gender voices?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-27-2016
(11-27-2016, 09:08 PM)James Bond Wrote: Relevant question do all 5G have both gender voices?
Since it was added with 2G, yes. And so 4G, 3G, and 2G programs have it.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 11-27-2016
It always sounded interesting having a custom with the listeners voice I always thought that would enchace greatly
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-27-2016
Hi Shannon!
I see you're building DMSI V3.0.1-A, very exciting! I can't wait!
I'm just curious, due to the fact that you have now a clearing/healing version, and a non clearing/healing version, as well as the hybrid tracks, will you now have to test all 3 versions with the models in order to arrive at an optimum loop/day figure for each? They seem different enough in nature to necessitate different loops.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-27-2016
(11-27-2016, 09:15 PM)James Bond Wrote: It always sounded interesting having a custom with the listeners voice I always thought that would enchace greatly
It does, since one trusts themselves significantly more than they trust an unknown voice. However, it can also be resisted. I had a woman who would resist the weight loss come to me and recorded the script in her own voice. She immediately started losing weight, until she hit the "brick wall" and then sabotaged it. Again.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-27-2016
(11-27-2016, 09:24 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon!
I see you're building DMSI V3.0.1-A, very exciting! I can't wait!
I'm just curious, due to the fact that you have now a clearing/healing version, and a non clearing/healing version, as well as the hybrid tracks, will you now have to test all 3 versions with the models in order to arrive at an optimum loop/day figure for each? They seem different enough in nature to necessitate different loops.
It would appear that I will have to model the loops per day for each type, and possibly treat the hybrids as a different type entirely... so I would have 4 versions to model. Not 3. Potentially. We shall see.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 11-27-2016
(11-27-2016, 09:45 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-27-2016, 09:15 PM)James Bond Wrote: It always sounded interesting having a custom with the listeners voice I always thought that would enchace greatly
It does, since one trusts themselves significantly more than they trust an unknown voice. However, it can also be resisted. I had a woman who would resist the weight loss come to me and recorded the script in her own voice. She immediately started losing weight, until she hit the "brick wall" and then sabotaged it. Again.
Well if one is recorded it without fully believing it, wouldn't that come through, especially to the subconscious?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 11-27-2016
It's aliveee
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-27-2016
(11-27-2016, 10:29 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(11-27-2016, 09:45 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-27-2016, 09:15 PM)James Bond Wrote: It always sounded interesting having a custom with the listeners voice I always thought that would enchace greatly
It does, since one trusts themselves significantly more than they trust an unknown voice. However, it can also be resisted. I had a woman who would resist the weight loss come to me and recorded the script in her own voice. She immediately started losing weight, until she hit the "brick wall" and then sabotaged it. Again.
Well if one is recorded it without fully believing it, wouldn't that come through, especially to the subconscious?
The subconscious of course remembers the recording process, and is exquisitely sensitive to vocal cues that communicate things. Part of why I use a TTS reader is because the reader gives clues to being a TTS reader, which produces a neutral response, whereas the human voiceover talents would have to do several takes to get the cues right - for each statement.
Currently a single statement will be a minimum of a paragraph long, and sometimes is pages at a time. That would be almost impossible to get through one statement with using a human voiceover talent.
The primary issue though is getting past resistance, which can be done without using one's own voice.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 11-27-2016
No chance we could get the 3.0.1A in advance?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-27-2016
(11-27-2016, 11:27 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: No chance we could get the 3.0.1A in advance?
Not without a seriously large bribe. lol