+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal (/Thread-Shannon-s-DMSI-V2-3-Journal)
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Shannon - 08-22-2016
(08-21-2016, 11:11 PM)FluffyBunny Wrote: Hey shannon,
How fast does the sub start to effect you? I have read all the journal and seems like it's pretty much right after you finish running the sub.
I have been wanting to start running it but I will staying with my mom for the next two weeks hence I don't wanna run it .
School starts soon for me and I wanna test to see what difference does it make on me . I havnt ran sub in almost a year.
Also if we purchase 2.3 would we have a free upgrade to 3.0 later ?
The sub starts to affect me, you and everyone else within seconds of starting it. But when you consciously notice those effects may be between seconds and hours of starting it, depending on various factors.
If 2.3 does not overall produce the results that make me happy, then 3.0 will be a free upgrade. But we need to see how 2.3 works first.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Shannon - 08-22-2016
(08-22-2016, 01:13 AM)Sickologist Wrote: Subliminal marijuana is an interesting idea. If you ever decide to create it, I'll be happy to enlist as a tester. If it works, talk about a money saver.
I've already created the prototype. It works. I just don't see it being a wise thing to do in various directions to finish developing it and release it. No testers necessary, though, I have all the testers I would ever have need for and more banging down my door on this one.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Shannon - 08-22-2016
(08-22-2016, 07:34 AM)Acmeisto Wrote: I think using psychedelics are totally fine and you might discover something new about yourself. But everybody makes his own choices and we need to respect to it.
(08-21-2016, 07:03 PM)bits Wrote:(08-21-2016, 06:59 PM)Rayhon Wrote: I know allot of guys who smoked all day every day and ended up having great careers and it never affected them.
I hear this statement a lot but have never seen it, the guys who smoked once per month while in college turned out fine. The ones who made smoking weed as part of their identity aka stoners, and cultural tokers are all textbook definition of "losers" (horrible job if employed at all, do nothing, accomplished nothing, only focus on weed) but I agree with you, better to have it legal than illegal.
I'm no square, i snort and inject all sorts of experimental russian peptides on a daily basis and enjoy weed but I think it's more harmful than people realize. Much better ways to spend your time than stoned and watching netflix everyday.
This stock broker smokes roughly 10 joints every single day and he is totally fine and a stock broker...
http://naturalsociety.com/medical-marijuana-activist-gets-300-joints-federal-government-monthly/
Maybe you should hang out less with stupid people and hang out with smart people ;-) Of course more successful people smoke less weed (usually) because they do not have time to watch Netflix stoned all the time.
I know one Australian guy and he smokes weed and he is smart and totally fine.
Who said I hang out with these guys? I just told you, I'm deathly allergic to MJ. I can't be around them because even when they're done smoking, it's on them and their clothes and in their cars, and that is still enough to start me drowning in my own lungs. I just happen to know them.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Shannon - 08-22-2016
(08-22-2016, 08:29 AM)RTBoss Wrote: It'd be nice if legalizing MJ would save the US from its debt. I think it's more realistic that we'd just find other ways to spend the money, like obese citizens on welfare with new flatscreen televisions, a PS4, and no job.
Well of course we have to actually want to get OUT of the national debt... regardless what we do, that's not going to happen until the Powers That Be decide that being out of debt is better than being in debt for whatever reasons they have for our current state of affairs.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Shannon - 08-22-2016
(08-22-2016, 01:17 PM)Boozy32 Wrote: shannon, will it be fine consuming the V8 natural energy drinks?
I'm not familiar with them, but it would seem to me that energy drinks might be a very good source of aura energy. Just be careful with them.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Shannon - 08-22-2016
Just got back from the sports bar. Had grilled wild Alaskan salmon, broccoli and zuchinni for lunch with some butter for fats. Delicious. I can't get enough of the wild Alaskan salmon, I could eat it twice a day every day.
Sitting there, I had just hit myself with a loop of DMSI at max volume, and I was feeling it, and I quickly noted that I had a woman in her mid sixties by my side, sitting next to me talking. Bar was almost empty, but she comes over and sits next to me and starts talking.
Not long after that I look to my left, and note that another woman in her 60's-70's is smiling at me rather overtly. It takes her ten minutes to get up and start over, and she wedges herself between me and this other woman and starts showing me pics of her son... the one I look like. Yes, this one came back.
For a little while I had them both going, and I was rather amused at this. But I apparently insulted one unintentionally when she told me the fragrance sample she was smelling was flowery/girly and I laughed in response. It was a relatively unisex fragrance, to which had been added a hint of Madagascar vanilla (what she was picking up as girly) and several strongly masculine animalic ingredients (to make it significantly more masculine).
After that, they engaged in their own conversation, and didn't really seem interested in me until I left, at which time they seemed body-language wise to be not wanting me to go.
During this whole exchange, I was also observing the bar staff and the servers. The bartendress was S, who is very slender and very focused in and through her mind. She seemed relatively unaffected, although I noted that she referred to me by a more intimate pet name than what she was calling everyone else. Don't remember what it was right now.
I did note that two of the servers appeared to be affected. The two most attractive ones, both blondes and both with nice backsides, seemed to be flustered and unsure what to do about it. Almost like being that strongly affected was making them nervous. But it was hard to read them.
Now I am back at the office and I am still feeling the energy in my skin, it's as if I feel it as it passes through my skin, but I don't sense it outside myself as immolation anymore.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Lowe - 08-22-2016
(08-22-2016, 08:29 AM)RTBoss Wrote: It'd be nice if legalizing MJ would save the US from its debt. I think it's more realistic that we'd just find other ways to spend the money, like obese citizens on welfare with new flatscreen televisions, a PS4, and no job.
Revenues from existing places that legalised MJ are decent but unfortunately a drop in the ocean as a whole for the government. There's enough to write a big cheque for (insert a political cause) though.
(08-22-2016, 02:28 PM)Shannon Wrote: Well of course we have to actually want to get OUT of the national debt... regardless what we do, that's not going to happen until the Powers That Be decide that being out of debt is better than being in debt for whatever reasons they have for our current state of affairs.
It is hard to actually want to get out of debt because it's always better to have the money in your pocket. Democrats want to increase spending, Republicans want to cut taxes, both of which does not help. I suspect having the financial discipline to impose a serious debt-reduction plan, which means significant tax increases for Democrats and significant cuts to public spending for Republicans, would simply enrage people as money is taken out of their pockets, one way or another, and the party in power gets the boot. Also, given how much money is currently owned it would take generations to clear it up.
But back to the point, I am excited to run 2.3 and early signs definitely show it to be better than 2.2 for me.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Shannon - 08-22-2016
(08-22-2016, 02:48 PM)Lowe Wrote:(08-22-2016, 08:29 AM)RTBoss Wrote: It'd be nice if legalizing MJ would save the US from its debt. I think it's more realistic that we'd just find other ways to spend the money, like obese citizens on welfare with new flatscreen televisions, a PS4, and no job.
Revenues from existing places that legalised MJ are decent but unfortunately a drop in the ocean as a whole for the government. There's enough to write a big cheque for (insert a political cause) though.
I'm referring to the focus on the plant as a cash crop if we were to use it as our primary source of raw materials for what it can be made into - I'm not interested in the monetary value for it's THC. It could easily run into the billions of dollars in exports if we played our cards right. Won't happen, but it's possible.
Quote:(08-22-2016, 02:28 PM)Shannon Wrote: Well of course we have to actually want to get OUT of the national debt... regardless what we do, that's not going to happen until the Powers That Be decide that being out of debt is better than being in debt for whatever reasons they have for our current state of affairs.
It is hard to actually want to get out of debt because it's always better to have the money in your pocket. Democrats want to increase spending, Republicans want to cut taxes, both of which does not help. I suspect having the financial discipline to impose a serious debt-reduction plan, which means significant tax increases for Democrats and significant cuts to public spending for Republicans, would simply enrage people as money is taken out of their pockets, one way or another, and the party in power gets the boot. Also, given how much money is currently owned it would take generations to clear it up.
Getting into discussing politics, which is against the rules. We should back off.
I don't think we are going to have a solution executed, but I do think common sense would make it easy of we had any at the government level.
Quote:But back to the point, I am excited to run 2.3 and early signs definitely show it to be better than 2.2 for me.
I think we're realistically going to need to make DMSI as a 2-stage set for 3.x and beyond.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - chaosvrgn - 08-22-2016
(08-22-2016, 02:28 PM)Shannon Wrote: Well of course we have to actually want to get OUT of the national debt... regardless what we do, that's not going to happen until the Powers That Be decide that being out of debt is better than being in debt for whatever reasons they have for our current state of affairs.
That moment when you tell people that the Federal Reserve -- the entity charged with regulating the currency of the United States -- isn't a governmental entity, is privately owned, and Congress has little oversight over it.
Their heads explode. Then they go on as if they didn't hear that private billionaires OWN the banks that the lend the US government money.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Shannon - 08-22-2016
That's because it's instant overload.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Have at ye - 08-22-2016
(08-22-2016, 02:53 PM)Shannon Wrote: I think we're realistically going to need to make DMSI as a 2-stage set for 3.x and beyond.
DMSI 2.3 is making me hyper, so I've got a silly suggestion. Did you perhaps try to run a model on how the program would work if divided into two separate audio files (not stages) - one with programming for Goals #1 and #3, and another one with Goals #2 and #4, and ran, for instance, on alternate days (say, Goals #1-#3 Monday, Goals #2-#4 Tuesday, etc. ad infinitum)?
That is, of course, if these can be separated that way.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - ncbeareatingman - 08-22-2016
More politic's. damn.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Shannon - 08-22-2016
(08-22-2016, 08:46 PM)Have at ye Wrote:(08-22-2016, 02:53 PM)Shannon Wrote: I think we're realistically going to need to make DMSI as a 2-stage set for 3.x and beyond.
DMSI 2.3 is making me hyper, so I've got a silly suggestion. Did you perhaps try to run a model on how the program would work if divided into two separate audio files (not stages) - one with programming for Goals #1 and #3, and another one with Goals #2 and #4, and ran, for instance, on alternate days (say, Goals #1-#3 Monday, Goals #2-#4 Tuesday, etc. ad infinitum)?
That is, of course, if these can be separated that way.
No. That would be a lot more difficult to do than it sounds. Unreasonably difficult.
RE: Shannon's DMSI V2.3 Journal - Shannon - 08-23-2016
Just got kissed on the neck...