![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - posh - 11-19-2016 (11-19-2016, 12:59 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-19-2016, 09:07 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon, shannon these are excellent ideas by steven. I don't care if i have to wait till new years. Please put these in dmsi if possible thanks RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 11-19-2016 (11-19-2016, 02:35 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:(11-19-2016, 01:25 PM)Dmitry Wrote: NSFM is excellent sub, indeed. It made me awake all my seduction knowledge in just one, smooth flow stream. If DMSI V3.0.1 is equipped with NSFM... well, we have an Oscar nominee here, gentlemen! Let just rename it to Natural Seduction Aid NSFM is easily one of my favorites. You'll love it Wolverine. It did pretty much everything Dmitry stated. Hoping that it gets included in V3.01. Theoretically, if the V3 sniper module works correctly and NSFM is also working correctly, it should translate to more capitalization on the user's part. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-19-2016 Only... NSFM is directly contradicting the rest of the DMSI program... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Ricardo - 11-19-2016 (11-19-2016, 03:24 PM)posh Wrote:(11-19-2016, 12:59 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-19-2016, 09:07 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon, Forget NSFM, just put in these brilliant suggestions by Steven!!!!! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Ricardo - 11-19-2016 Shannon, don't waste time putting NSFM in with DMSI. It's totally contradictory and if people want to use NSFM then they can do so as a stand alone if they want to RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-19-2016 Guys, if Shannon says NSFM is contradictory, it's contradictory. Let's not do this begging for NSFM so he that he feels the need to build a version including it just to prove that it will fail and shut everyone up. It's a waste of everyone's time. Let's allow him to focus on the billion other additions he has planned. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ImFreeman - 11-19-2016 (11-19-2016, 04:16 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Guys, if Shannon says NSFM is contradictory, it's contradictory. Let's not do this begging for NSFM so he that he feels the need to build a version including it just to prove that it will fail and shut everyone up. It's a waste of everyone's time. Let's allow him to focus on the billion other additions he has planned. There are several users here who have not developed basic flirting skills. For them (and i consider myself included) it would be very beneficial. Not everybody here lost their virginity in a threesome RT, some are still virgins and still very undeveloped in that department If a situation presents itself were to take advantage of it the user needs to take some charge and make at least a little bit 'happen' then NSFM will be useful. It contradicts the goal? maybe the goal needs to be refocused. IMHO the goal is sex abundance with high value partners. We should strive to reach it and not be 'anal' about the way we reach it RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-19-2016 You guys are so focused on one goal and one way to it, it's no wonder you have these issues. DMSI goal is to get others to approach and initiate. In the end, that is the goal and it's not changing unless I have no choice. I have that choice, because I know I can achieve that goal. Maybe not in 3.0, but I can and I will. Even if NSFM can be added in a way that would enhance instead of detract, which may be possible, it is still training wheels for guys who are stuck in the paradigm that got them where they are now. It almost certainly won't be included in the final no matter what for that reason. So if I can find a way to add it and enhance DMSI, I will try. If I run out of time, it may get passed over. There are several other much more important things to add still. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Ricardo - 11-19-2016 (11-19-2016, 05:02 PM)Shannon Wrote: You guys are so focused on one goal and one way to it, it's no wonder you have these issues. If you don't like the goals of DMSI as Shannon intends or they don't fit your perceptions then don't use it. Why would anyone want to make things more difficult in the dating game than they need be? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Frosted - 11-19-2016 Shannon, I have a problem using persuasion and I'm not very charismatic. I want to be able to be really good at communication. AM6 has made me more dominant and able to walk away from situations I don't like, but I'm not very good at leading interactions skillfully into a direction I want. I don't know if that will come with more AM6, but I was wondering if there was a sub that would help me achieve this? Maybe BASE? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 11-19-2016 (11-19-2016, 05:12 PM)Frosted Wrote: Shannon, I have a problem using persuasion and I'm not very charismatic. I want to be able to be really good at communication. AM6 has made me more dominant and able to walk away from situations I don't like, but I'm not very good at leading interactions skillfully into a direction I want. I don't know if that will come with more AM6, but I was wondering if there was a sub that would help me achieve this? Maybe BASE? What about WM? At least if it is related to women. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Frosted - 11-19-2016 Wm is too go with the flow, I'm looking to direct the energy not be directed by it. I want to be more like Shannon's vibe vs a party guy who has no center. Edit: btw Shannon, where did you get your speaking style from? Did you have it before or did you get it from BASE and AM? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 11-19-2016 I'm down with whatever works. If adding NSFM makes it work, cool. If not adding NSFM makes DMSI work, cool with that too. I'm sure nobody is going to complain if bombshells are directly soliciting them for sex. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 11-19-2016 (11-19-2016, 04:44 PM)ImFreeman Wrote:(11-19-2016, 04:16 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Guys, if Shannon says NSFM is contradictory, it's contradictory. Let's not do this begging for NSFM so he that he feels the need to build a version including it just to prove that it will fail and shut everyone up. It's a waste of everyone's time. Let's allow him to focus on the billion other additions he has planned. Couldn't have said it any better. In the end, we can all agree we want sexual abundance. Whatever it takes to get there, let's be more flexible about it. If NSFM helps us get there faster, Shannon will decide in his experimentations. If not, so be it. People are so obsessed with the idea of women having to all the work (the entire approach to seduction thing), that they're being so narrow-minded regarding the addition of things like NSFM, that could potentially assist us. Remember guys, sex is a two-way effort. If NFSM doesn't get added to 3.0.1, I would even consider switching to it for a month or so, to enhance my flirting and seduction skills (I don't know when, but some time down the track). |