(11-17-2016, 12:21 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 12:14 AM)Shannon Wrote: I don't know what PMO is, it would be helpful to know what that is to answer the question. It would also be helpful to know what you are referring to in terms of titles. Some titles are designed to speed up the healing process, for example. And not everything is in 5.5 or even 5G.

He is talking about Porn, Masturbation, Orgasm.

(11-16-2016, 01:17 PM)Illumi Wrote: Shannon care to elaborate more about the " concious part of the sniper " in DMSI v2.5
Today i saw it in action and i knew it had to be it. It worked almost too well, i wanna know what actually triggers it!

(11-17-2016, 04:01 AM)posh Wrote: shannon you need to explain what you mean when u say ur working on different modules. none of us know what things like "Currently working on AUTBFS module for MIR/DMSI." even mean. If would be helpful if u explained what the modules were for.

thanks

(11-17-2016, 06:40 AM)robstar Wrote: Shannon I think another sub that would potentially help you become a multimillionaire would be a "Be free from all addictions" sub. It would've best for it to not force the user to never do or take the addictive element again, because most people don't like the idea that they don't have a choice, but rather gets the user free of the addictive component, destroying the addict mind so to speak so the user is free to do or not do what they choose.

(11-17-2016, 06:52 AM)Dmitry Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 06:40 AM)robstar Wrote: Shannon I think another sub that would potentially help you become a multimillionaire would be a "Be free from all addictions" sub. It would've best for it to not force the user to never do or take the addictive element again, because most people don't like the idea that they don't have a choice, but rather gets the user free of the addictive component, destroying the addict mind so to speak so the user is free to do or not do what they choose.

If unconscious causes (secondary gains) to take addicts material are solved/healed, then there are no reasons to continue the use of drugs and etc.
Don't consider the unconscious stupid: if drugs are "giving" something to user, that cannot be obtained via "normal" ways, the person will continue the addictive behavior.

(11-17-2016, 07:05 AM)Duke.Togo Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 06:52 AM)Dmitry Wrote:

(11-17-2016, 06:40 AM)robstar Wrote: Shannon I think another sub that would potentially help you become a multimillionaire would be a "Be free from all addictions" sub. It would've best for it to not force the user to never do or take the addictive element again, because most people don't like the idea that they don't have a choice, but rather gets the user free of the addictive component, destroying the addict mind so to speak so the user is free to do or not do what they choose.

If unconscious causes (secondary gains) to take addicts material are solved/healed, then there are no reasons to continue the use of drugs and etc.
Don't consider the unconscious stupid: if drugs are "giving" something to user, that cannot be obtained via "normal" ways, the person will continue the addictive behavior.

It depends on the drug, and in many cases it goes beyond just what the subconscious wants. On the one hand, yes, there is a mental factor that it starts with, but look at Heroine and Crack, those were physically addictive substances. Nicotine is the worst drug because it is socially acceptable.

Drug use and addiction can have several factors to it, and while there is a mental role at play, there are also physical addictions that need to be considered.

I'm not the expert on this, so I'm sure Shannon has a better grasp of the material, but I personally had a friend who OD'd on heroine.

He also happened to come from a good family, was a Harvard Law School graduate and had a 2 year old son and a beautiful wife that he left behind.

In the end he was out of control. What and why and how it all happened is a long winded history, but what I do know is there was a physical element to it all that he had to get a fix for.

All I'm saying is addiction isn't always a simple subconscious needing something argument. I don't think there's anything simple about addiction.

But again, I'm not an expert. I would default to Shannon on how effective a sub can be in instances like this.

(11-17-2016, 12:12 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(11-16-2016, 06:25 PM)K-Train Wrote: Shannon the fellas and I have been responding to this thread here, here, and here. Note: those are my posts but they also encompass the ideas laid forth by others in the thread. RTBoss, Alpha360, Ricardo, and Maxx contributed as well. Just throwing that out there. All links are in chronological order.

I'll shorthand the idea here though. Basically, we are discussing dropping the "perfect" from the AYP series in favor of something quicker. Attract an Amazing/Attractive Lover (AAL for short). This series would be the equivalent of fast food.

I remember you told me that with the AYPs there were three options: 1)Good, 2) Fast, and 3) Cheap. We could only get 2 out of the 3. We're choosing options 2 and 3 here. If you don't have time to read every post, the very last link will sum everything up. Thanks Shannon.

You will have to wait a while, because I am planning to rebuild the AYP series using current technology, and I expect based on the experiments that I have done, and what I have seen it do under even adverse test conditions in DMSI, that time will no longer be an issue.

To clarify perfect, though, let's consider "perfect lover".

Such a person would very likely or certainly be:

* The most physically attractive you believe you can get at the time, subconsciously.
* Maximally compatible with you sexually.
* Sexually available.
* Of legal age of sexual consent

Such a person may or may not not be:

* Sane
* Geographically close
* Mature
* Healthy emotionally
* Sober/Clean
* Single or otherwise un-involved
* Capable of romance
* Without children

The perfect part applies only to the descriptive of what the focus is, in this case "lover". Nothing else.

Doing what you suggest will lower the standards further, and widen the pool of available candidates, making it easier and faster to do and producing more candidates. However, we don't know if the new technology will make the AYP series perform the way we want yet. I am going to see if I can make it do what us desired before I lower the standards.

(11-17-2016, 10:17 AM)Ricardo Wrote: Time may not be the issue going forward but whether the 'perfect' person actually exist in the first place is still the Achilles heel as far as I can see.