Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-13-2016 (11-13-2016, 06:01 AM)robstar Wrote:(11-13-2016, 02:35 AM)Cozy Wrote:(11-13-2016, 01:23 AM)heavysm Wrote:(11-12-2016, 11:40 PM)Cozy Wrote: I understand Shannon, maybe you can ignore other people's judgments one or twice, but when you're constantly around people who misunderstand or criticize you, eventually you'll crack, it's just human nature. Well any sort of calculation we make like that is still based on and dependent on our experience with others, and I don't think the solution is to interpret every social cue as a positive value assessment on the part of others, you can do that, but you'll probably end up in the mental hospital, or labelled weird. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-13-2016 (11-13-2016, 03:13 AM)K-Train Wrote: Indeed, most require some form of external validation. I think the real issue is how much external validation is it that you require in order to continue to survive and move forward. A person who almost exclusively relies on external validation in order to feel good about themselves is going to get f*cked in the ass (metaphorically speaking :P) because if they need (keyword: need) near constant external validation then they're going to be in serious trouble. So if your argument is everyone needs/requires external validation at some point...then yeah I'd say you have a good argument on your hands. Agreed RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 11-13-2016 (11-13-2016, 07:17 AM)Cozy Wrote:(11-13-2016, 06:01 AM)robstar Wrote:(11-13-2016, 02:35 AM)Cozy Wrote:(11-13-2016, 01:23 AM)heavysm Wrote:(11-12-2016, 11:40 PM)Cozy Wrote: I understand Shannon, maybe you can ignore other people's judgments one or twice, but when you're constantly around people who misunderstand or criticize you, eventually you'll crack, it's just human nature. I wasn't saying to interpret every social cue as positive value assessments, rather when you realise the good feeling you receive when others validate you is really just you allowing yourself to feel validated then you can begin to supply your own validation to yourself regardless of what's going on around you. It's a concept in the Sedona Method and Release Technique based on the teachings of Lester Levenson called "hootlessness". RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-13-2016 (11-12-2016, 07:10 PM)Big Boss Wrote: Shannon I had a question about AM. You said it continues the growing process after one run through. Can you please explain a bit more about this? Is it as if it's installed and keeps producing? Please give some clarity Imagine the Titanic sitting at rest, afloat, in the ocean. It will be drifting along with the current. Now, turn on the engines to, sat, half power and give the rudder a setting and you're going to come to a specific point after a period of time. If you then cut the engines, does the ship stop dead instantly? No, it is not a binary; the inertia will continue to carry the ship forward according to the speed and mass of the ship minus the drag on the ship. In the same way, AM6 will continue to affect you after you finish using it. Furthermore, any changes you have made fully during the run will become self supporting and self continuing. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Life - 11-13-2016 Perfect answer thanks Shannon RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - KingDavid93 - 11-13-2016 How much time would I need to take off between V1 and V3 of DMSI? Also what are the optimal # of loops to run for V1 and do they need to be consecutive loops without taking a break? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-13-2016 (11-13-2016, 03:29 PM)KingDavid93 Wrote: How much time would I need to take off between V1 and V3 of DMSI? Ideally, you would take 5+ days off of V1 through 2.3 2.4 would be 10 days 2.5 would be 16 days 3.x will be 21 days. But realistically, nobody's going to do that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-13-2016 (11-13-2016, 05:59 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-13-2016, 03:29 PM)KingDavid93 Wrote: How much time would I need to take off between V1 and V3 of DMSI? Are you going to want testers to take that time off before 3.0.1's release? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 11-13-2016 (11-13-2016, 05:59 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-13-2016, 03:29 PM)KingDavid93 Wrote: How much time would I need to take off between V1 and V3 of DMSI? Would it be detrimental to go straight from 2.4 to 3.0.1 when it comes out? I plan on taking like only 1 or 2 days off between. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-13-2016 (11-13-2016, 06:34 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(11-13-2016, 05:59 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-13-2016, 03:29 PM)KingDavid93 Wrote: How much time would I need to take off between V1 and V3 of DMSI? I'm going to say that everyone should be at least 7 days off off DMSI previous versions before using it, and I'll put the word out when I release it. P3/P4 will keep it running in your head that long at least. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-13-2016 (11-13-2016, 11:04 PM)Jackson Chandra Wrote: Shannon, when we using subs and we face a laziness to continue listenning to sub, is that another form of resistance? Also feeling that I dont need listenning to that sub anymore, no vigor, no passion to run it, in this case, stage 2 of AM. Of course it is. It's too hard to freakin' press play? That's resistance. If you're not done with AM, keep going until you are. Like instructed. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RoaringLion - 11-14-2016 Yes Shannon! Work on that sniper! I have a target at my job that really needs sniping RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-14-2016 Hi Shannon! Some more questions from me: 1. How many 6G technologies that we haven't seen before will be introduced in V3.0.1? I think you said before in a somewhat old post that about 80-120 technologies make up 6G. Just wanted to know if we will have any new faces this time around besides the one I read about in your journal. I'm sure the existing ones will be tweaked at a minimum, of course. 2. How are things going with V3.0.1 now? Is it still looking like we may be able to get it earlier than expected? I know you said you wanted to get it out by the end of the month, if not sooner. So I just wondered if you are still on pace for this, that gives me 2 big outings left max on V2.5 then I can switch over, unless it's earlier than that in which case rock on, lol. 3. Do you have any plans to introduce more programming for neediness destruction and approval-seeking destruction, self validation? At times I have found myself exhibiting the opposite of those things, in particular to girls I want to respond to the program, when I feel I don't get the attention I want etc. Even to the point of seeking them out, almost "chasing" them, so the opposite of what the program is directing and of course, not attractive. Not always, but more often than I'd like and I know consciously that it's a mistake so I'd like to rectify this. Whereas with others, maybe due to the programming, or due to my lower state of interest, or both, I seem to be able to keep things in check. And of course, the other things we've talked about as issues of mine: limiting beliefs, self sabotage, and a feeling of deservedness of some of these girls (which may just be another term for limiting beliefs?), are contributors to my situation and I'm glad to see they will be included in V3.0.1. Thanks Shannon, looking forward to V3.0.1 with earnest! It will be a step forward for me no doubt, it will have several of the things I've struggled with for a long time included. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-14-2016 (11-14-2016, 12:20 AM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon! I am journaling almost all of what I do to DMSI for 3.0.1. So you'll see some new technology modules added and some new concepts added and some old stuff optimized and added to. I haven't been keeping track of how many new ones have been added and are aimed for addition. Quote:2. How are things going with V3.0.1 now? Is it still looking like we may be able to get it earlier than expected? I know you said you wanted to get it out by the end of the month, if not sooner. So I just wondered if you are still on pace for this, that gives me 2 big outings left max on V2.5 then I can switch over, unless it's earlier than that in which case rock on, lol. You don't want 3.0.1 earlier than expected. You want me to work on it until the last possible moment. Why? Because I have several important things to do that will prevent me from working on DMSI for a while after 3.0.1 is released. So I'm aiming to stop adding by the 21st and focus on optimizing and prep for build, and release it on or before the 27th. I have a long list of things to add, and no specific amount that I'm aiming to add in 3.0.1; I'm just working through the list, trying to add the most important things right now. Quote:3. Do you have any plans to introduce more programming for neediness destruction and approval-seeking destruction, self validation? At times I have found myself exhibiting the opposite of those things, in particular to girls I want to respond to the program, when I feel I don't get the attention I want etc. Even to the point of seeking them out, almost "chasing" them, so the opposite of what the program is directing and of course, not attractive. Not always, but more often than I'd like and I know consciously that it's a mistake so I'd like to rectify this. Whereas with others, maybe due to the programming, or due to my lower state of interest, or both, I seem to be able to keep things in check. And of course, the other things we've talked about as issues of mine: limiting beliefs, self sabotage, and a feeling of deservedness of some of these girls (which may just be another term for limiting beliefs?), are contributors to my situation and I'm glad to see they will be included in V3.0.1. Yes, actually. I do. Time will tell if I can get it into 3.0, but I will try. Quote:Thanks Shannon, looking forward to V3.0.1 with earnest! It will be a step forward for me no doubt, it will have several of the things I've struggled with for a long time included. Just keep plugging away at it, and eventually the dam will break. |