Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-12-2016 (11-12-2016, 06:37 PM)Cozy Wrote:(11-12-2016, 06:03 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-12-2016, 05:52 PM)Cozy Wrote:(11-12-2016, 05:18 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-12-2016, 05:06 PM)Cozy Wrote: How important do you think positive reinforcement is, because I don't think anyone can get very far without it. I can't exactly make an argument without going through and writing a book in response. It was a very complex argument for, and the argument against is at least as complex. Quote:Well I'm sorry if I offended you, I'm just giving honest feedback and hoping you could meet half way logically. Actually you getting upset is just proving my point. We as humans need positive feedback, from whoever can give it. You haven't offended me, I'm just frustrated that I cannot actually be more specific and in depth with my response because I am testing MIR and because it is too complex an answer to give here. It has nothing to do with offense. And then of course that means it;s not proving your point. It is entirely possible to be your own source of positive feedback. Believe me, if I wasn't my own source of positive feedback, I would not be able to withstand the barrage of criticism I get daily for my work, while working to create sounds that change the world in ways that are currently thought to be impossible. My feedback comes from my knowing factually what I know, even if I cannot express it sufficiently to persuade others without making the programs to do that for me. My point is that you do not need to derive your value from what anyone else says, and if your value is determined internally, the result is that it becomes an external reality as well. This is where the phrase, "First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then you win" comes from. Quote:Nobody is a monk in the real world. Except real world monks. Quote:I'm not saying that the subs aren't valuable or that they don't have potential, I'm just saying that right now I can't really see that they're life-changing, can they turn a loser into a playboy, or an average joe into a millionaire? That remains to be seen... that's all. I'm just being honest. There's a lot more to "life changing" that turning a loser into a playboy millionaire. You're ignoring a whole lot by assuming that. But that happens, with and without "self help". There is a reason we don't allow just anyone to buy BAMM. It's because the program can be resisted, and because most people would buy it, sit on their couch, smoke weed, eat Cheetos and play World of Tanks and then cry when it didn't magically make them a millionaire. Becoming a millionaire happens one of two ways: Destiny, or work.Most of us are not destined for it. Most of us are not destined against having it happen, either; so for those people who are in between those two extremes, they can achieve it, but it takes work. And usually a lot of it. Which most people don't want to do. That's why it's aimed at a 1 to 8 year usage time frame. That's why we don't let just anyone buy it. Nothing changes but by the change of the mind first. That's where subliminals come in. And they are very life changing. But then not all such changes are quick, binary or obvious. Subs have changed my life, though. From pathetic doormat to self made man, and eventually self made millionaire and then billionaire too, if I want it. That's pretty life changing. And that's only one person, looking at one thing. I'm not defensive or taking offense. I'm used to dealing with criticism. (That's another "life change" that happened because of subliminals, by the way.) The original argument was that value is internal at it's core, and that is true. No matter how beautiful you are, if you believe you are worthless, you will manifest that reality. Plenty of beauty queens have ended up shriveled up crack addicts in the alley because of exactly that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 11-12-2016 Shannon said: "What if just by running a subliminal, you could cause the people you find sexually attractive to be unable to stop having pornographic sexual fantasies about you?" 1) How can I best ask this? Am I correct to assume that the fantasies would be including the user and the affected involved in such acts simultaneously with each other? 2) Also in addition to it including the usual things that most people might fantasize about, how about it also including the affected's favorite secret fetishes? (Kind of like putting extra toppings on an already awesome sundae! Or rocket fuel in your favorite sports car.) 3) As well as them fantasizing about what the user would want to do, and the affected enjoying that and wanting it too? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-12-2016 (11-12-2016, 07:36 PM)Steven Wrote: Shannon said: No, I had plans for the fantasies to be about the affected and certain rare species of Italian bolete mushrooms. Of course, Steve. The goal of the fantasies is to get them thinking about, wanting, normalizing and looking forward to sex with the user. Quote:2) Also in addition to it including the usual things that most people might fantasize about, how about it also including the affected's favorite secret fetishes? (Kind of like putting extra toppings on an already awesome sundae! Or rocket fuel in your favorite sports car.) I'm not trying to direct their fantasies except to make them involve the user and the affected, be positive and enjoyable, and involve sex between them and the user. Quote:3) As well as them fantasizing about what the user would want to do, and the affected enjoying that and wanting it too? They will fantasize about whatever they find arousing. Not the user. The goal is to use as little effort and energy as possible to achieve the goal. We have a lot of things that need to be powered. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-12-2016 (11-12-2016, 07:29 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-12-2016, 06:37 PM)Cozy Wrote:(11-12-2016, 06:03 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-12-2016, 05:52 PM)Cozy Wrote:(11-12-2016, 05:18 PM)Shannon Wrote: Positive reinforcement is important depending on how well you have mastered your understanding of where your value actually comes from. So, (and I'm glad you didn't take offense) what happens when there is a baby who is born self-validating (if that's possible) and is met with parents that neglect, degrade or criticize them. Do they just not care and continue self validating? I'm not saying that there aren't people who don't deal with criticism and succeed regardless, I'm saying that they usually have some source of confidence, whether it's their upbringing or someone specific that encourages them. I maintain, I don't think it's possible for someone to be completely self validating, nobody is that powerful and not needing. Maybe a monk does, but a monk doesn't know much in terms of what this world has to offer. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-12-2016 (11-12-2016, 10:56 PM)Cozy Wrote:(11-12-2016, 07:29 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-12-2016, 06:37 PM)Cozy Wrote:(11-12-2016, 06:03 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-12-2016, 05:52 PM)Cozy Wrote: I think I might have to disagree with you on this. Human beings aren't mountains, we're social creatures more than anything, we can't resist that fact anymore than we can resist wanting to ****, eat or sleep. It is extremely rare for someone to be born self validating. It almost always comes from the realization and understanding that seeking validation from outside yourself is a failing proposition. But, in such a case, the child will simply disregard what the criticisors say and do, understanding that it is done out of ignorance and therefore is invalid as a source of value assessment for the self, regardless. Most adults never achieve that level of self awareness or wisdom, never mind children. Quote:I'm not saying that there aren't people who don't deal with criticism and succeed regardless, I'm saying that they usually have some source of confidence, whether it's their upbringing or someone specific that encourages them. It is almost always their past and their understanding from their experiences what is what when it comes to their personal value. I used to rely on others for my point of view of myself and my self evaluation. Now, through my experiences and my understanding, I do not. I base my value on my own assessments, and the rest are welcome to disagree all they like. It is immaterial because they are not my source of self validation or valuation. Quote:I maintain, I don't think it's possible for someone to be completely self validating, nobody is that powerful and not needing. Again, because you don't think it is possible holds no water in whether or not it actually is. And you are seriously misunderstanding monks. If you want to disagree with me, then by all means, feel free. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-12-2016 I understand Shannon, maybe you can ignore other people's judgments one or twice, but when you're constantly around people who misunderstand or criticize you, eventually you'll crack, it's just human nature. I know the kind of person you're talking about, a person who makes their own rules and always has a high opinion of themselves, but even they have their limits, if they're in a group setting they will be influenced and change their actions to avoid criticism. You can't avoid human nature, it would be best just to work with it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 11-13-2016 (11-12-2016, 11:40 PM)Cozy Wrote: I understand Shannon, maybe you can ignore other people's judgments one or twice, but when you're constantly around people who misunderstand or criticize you, eventually you'll crack, it's just human nature. What's your definition of "cracking" in this instance? As far as groups...there have been many groups in history with extreme viewpoints. Cults are notorious for this because they are able to use the power of the group (among other things like perhaps fear) to influence individuals. That said, we also know that there have been and continue to be people who were/are embedded in those groups who have broken away and began to form their own conclusions based off their personal experiences and/or information that they've gathered. Not necessarily "cults" either, it could be political groups, certain ideologies, etc. Its human nature to go along with the group yet we see repeatedly people can outright resist and even overcome that basic tenet of human nature. One of the defining characteristics of successful people is in their ability to consistently (although perhaps not always) resist negativity and nay-saying from others and then eventually progressing. Often times, overcoming human nature is a part of that. In Shannon's case he deals with many people (including people on this forum) who tell him on a consistent basis that what he's doing is crazy/impossible/stupid/trash/waste-of-time/etc yet here he is and here we are. Now given sufficient mental/phsyical/social forces we could force Shannon to indeed crack (if by cracking you mean quitting) which is why torture is effective lol. But are we discussing "cracking" in absolute terms or "cracking" in terms of what the average everyday person goes through? If it's the former, then yes, I believe almost everyone will crack if by cracking you mean giving up at some point due to extreme methods. If it's the latter, then I'd simply say a good number will crack (once again, "crack" in this case meaning give up) and a number of them won't. I think the main point here is that it's hard for many people to truly imagine living their life without needing/requiring external validation and positive reinforcement from others. People who have such a reality are in the overwhelming minority when compared to everyone else. It's also why many people are on this site to reach such a level because we've come to understand that relying/needing external validation leads to so much BS as CV just explained. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 11-13-2016 (11-12-2016, 11:40 PM)Cozy Wrote: I understand Shannon, maybe you can ignore other people's judgments one or twice, but when you're constantly around people who misunderstand or criticize you, eventually you'll crack, it's just human nature. Errr...then I would change the people I'm around and find more like minded friends. Regarding my friends, this has happened to me and I simply made the decision to move away from those people i once resonated with and connect with people who share similar goals (speaking just of the friends side of this situation). Also, strong spirited people generally don't change their behavior to suit those around them. Being who they are naturally helps them attract those they get along with anyway. Otherwise they're just pandering to people they may not want to be around. It really doesn't make sense that a strong assertive person would change their ways to suit the opinions of others. That's what makes them strong and assertive; they are unwilling to adjust themselves to work within a level of behavior that they disagree with. Weak spirited people, maybe. Strong spirited? Nope. One personal example I'll share is my own family. There isn't a trace of entrepreneurial ambition that i can find aside from myself, and it's always rough talking to them about any of my stuff. But I have somehow kept my course despite a wave of criticism and constant judgement. This wasn't being resistant to their judgements once or twice...but for decades, and from multiple family members who are 10000% convinced they are right and i am wrong. But i know who i am and what i want, so they can't touch that. They aren't going to sway my core values since they're so off track from where I'm at. If your last sentence was really true I would have given in and slogged away at a job like what they keep hammering at me, and I'd be in the same boat they are. But that hasn't happened. Despite their best efforts, I have yet to 'crack' RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-13-2016 (11-13-2016, 12:46 AM)K-Train Wrote:(11-12-2016, 11:40 PM)Cozy Wrote: I understand Shannon, maybe you can ignore other people's judgments one or twice, but when you're constantly around people who misunderstand or criticize you, eventually you'll crack, it's just human nature. Well I can't argue with that, I've never seen or experienced living without external validation of some sort, I can only doubt or take your word for it. Sounds a lot like some kind of monk though. Even psychopaths who are born completely devoid of social emotions still have egos and will rely on external validation. I very very highly doubt that someone can live their life without being effected by external validation. Monks have to isolate themselves from the world and be satisfied with next to nothing to achieve stuff like that, even enlightened gurus (in Hindu culture) still care to an extent. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-13-2016 (11-13-2016, 01:23 AM)heavysm Wrote:(11-12-2016, 11:40 PM)Cozy Wrote: I understand Shannon, maybe you can ignore other people's judgments one or twice, but when you're constantly around people who misunderstand or criticize you, eventually you'll crack, it's just human nature. Well my situation is just like yours lol, I've yet to crack but that's only because I've managed to avoid them. I'd also be lying though, if I said their attitudes and beliefs hasn't effected me, however brief or minor. Finding friends and acquaintances who share your values is an example of working with human nature, to be honest I'm not sure if those people were around or if someone hadn't inspired you, you'd be able to break free. I know my ability to break free was because of the way I was treated as kid (my family basically treated me like a king), that always stuck with me and I probably wouldn't be who I am today if wasn't for that, maybe in your case it was one person or a group of people who inspired you. But there's always a trace, we aren't so defiant for no reason, we don't think we can do it without an inspiration. It's unavoidable, external validation not only shapes us as kids, it defines what we think is acceptable and achievable, in more than one area. Going against this is a struggle only few go through, but never fully overcome, even if they become completely successful in their endeavours. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 11-13-2016 Indeed, most require some form of external validation. I think the real issue is how much external validation is it that you require in order to continue to survive and move forward. A person who almost exclusively relies on external validation in order to feel good about themselves is going to get f*cked in the ass (metaphorically speaking ) because if they need (keyword: need) near constant external validation then they're going to be in serious trouble. So if your argument is everyone needs/requires external validation at some point...then yeah I'd say you have a good argument on your hands. But again, some of the biggest advancements we've had in history politically, socially, economically, technologically and in terms of sports has come from people who had enough conviction and self validation to persevere through severe droughts of external validation. Jackie Robinson (first African American to play in Major League Baseball) had a metric shit-ton of people providing him with no external validation. Of course he had support from key people (external validation) which no doubt helped him along. But without sufficient internal validation (knowing that he was a great player even if people called him the N-word or whatever) he would have quit like everyone else. You can switch Jackie Robinson around with some other historical figure that had to endure heaps doubters, nay-sayers, and whatever before they got external validation (if ever). Many people are indeed shaped by external validation absolutely. But I would argue (and I'm sure others would as well) that eventually it becomes necessary for the sake of peace of mind to reduce the amount of external validation required to such a point that you can live your life happily relying mainly and heavily (although not necessarily exclusively) on your own self-validation. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 11-13-2016 (11-12-2016, 11:40 PM)Cozy Wrote: I understand Shannon, maybe you can ignore other people's judgments one or twice, but when you're constantly around people who misunderstand or criticize you, eventually you'll crack, it's just human nature. Pressure can Crack things but they can also create diamonds. Only a low developed person will succumb to critiscism. A Master will recognize that the others are just parts of himself that may have a point and need to keep In check. They use others negativity for their rise. Its like a snake. For one person the venom might be poison but for a scientist/ Shaman the poision might be medicine. Resistance is supposed to make you stronger and ascend to great heights. An eagle could now fly without wind resistance and you could not walk without resistance from the ground. Why would you avoid critiscsm when you know that it can be used for your betterment. This is the science of Alchemy, turning lead into gold. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 11-13-2016 (11-13-2016, 02:35 AM)Cozy Wrote:(11-13-2016, 01:23 AM)heavysm Wrote:(11-12-2016, 11:40 PM)Cozy Wrote: I understand Shannon, maybe you can ignore other people's judgments one or twice, but when you're constantly around people who misunderstand or criticize you, eventually you'll crack, it's just human nature. Given the fact that any meaning derived from anything is created in your own mind, one could argue that there is no such thing as external validation as it is all created internally anyway. When someone loves you, you don't literally feel their love, your brain creates a feeling based on what you believe that means. That's also why there are depressed people who feel completely unloved despite the fact that people love them. With the realisation of this, as well as the realisation that we control our own minds, one can begin to completely disregard external validation, as it only means what we think it means anyway. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-13-2016 (11-13-2016, 05:50 AM)Hercules Wrote:(11-12-2016, 11:40 PM)Cozy Wrote: I understand Shannon, maybe you can ignore other people's judgments one or twice, but when you're constantly around people who misunderstand or criticize you, eventually you'll crack, it's just human nature. Lol, my point is that we're only human and we are, no matter how much we resist effected by it. We can succumb to it, or it can push us to prove others wrong, but my point still stands. Our value will always be determined by others, if you choose to interact with this world that is. We are social creatures, not machines. There's always a limit to our resilience. |