Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-28-2015 (12-26-2015, 05:20 AM)SouthPaw Wrote: Hey Shannon I recommend you drink apple cider vinegar everyday and you won't get the flu and won't be needing MIR. I had forgotten about that. Not sure where mine is anymore, I use to use it to remove especially stubborn warts. Haven't had any warts for years, so not sure what happened to the ACV. Never thought of using it for cold or flu. But then, I get sick so rarely that of course I wouldn't remember to think of something like that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-28-2015 (12-18-2015, 10:02 AM)zainuu163 Wrote: Hey Shannon, Not bad ideas. Make a thread in the requests section, please. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-28-2015 (12-18-2015, 04:12 PM)dweller94 Wrote:(12-17-2015, 11:22 PM)Shannon Wrote: OF I've actually been contemplating how the OF 5G script would affect phobias while I was sick and unable to get out of bed. I think it may benefit from some optimization in that direction. I'll have to do a bit of research on the differences between fears and phobias. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-28-2015 (12-18-2015, 05:24 PM)4Kingdoms Wrote:(12-17-2015, 10:27 PM)Shannon Wrote: Regardless of how similar the script is in the end for the 5G versions of OF and OGSF, the best option depends on the desired goal and the specifics of the individual. In most cases, my opinion is that OGSF will be the better of the two because it deals with all three simultaneously; but, because there is less focus, this process will take longer for each of the three targets. If guilt or shame are not a serious concern for you, or are not a concern right now, then OF 5G would provide the advantage of focus and thus increased obviousness (since apparently "obviation" is too advanced a word for modern English dictionaries) and speed of results. On the contrary, I am really positive that everyone has guilt, shame and fear to deal with. The guilt and shame may or may not be tied in with the fear. If the fear is a bigger issue, then focus on that. For a better overall clear-out, deal with all three at once. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-28-2015 (12-19-2015, 07:06 AM)QuantumEnthusiast Wrote: Hey Shannon, I just remembered that I read somewhere if the subliminal messages are sped up they become way less effective. You might know this already, just thought I'd let you know anyway in case you were using that method to increase the input as you claim the 5G versions have a massive subliminal data input to your brain. When you adjust the time in which the audio is expressed by shortening the time without trying to reduce the amount of audio to be expressed, you get the phenomenon that past a certain point, even the best techniques are forced to lose so much audio data that the audio is no longer comprehensible to even the subconscious mind. This is simple fact; when you reduce the time, the number of samples must be increased or you lose data. So if we want to stay at 44.1 kHz sample rate, we must find the point at which we have the best speed and retain comprehensibility. I have done that. There is a limit to how much faster the speech can be made, and beyond that limit, you rapidly lose comprehension. It plots out on a comprehension vs speed XY plot as a line that remains relatively flat until you begin approaching the limit, and then past the limit, drops off like a stone. I'm probably the only person alive who knows, with as much specificity and accuracy as I do, just exactly how fast you can increase the speed of speech without losing comprehension. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-28-2015 (12-19-2015, 11:39 AM)FrostedFake Wrote:(12-19-2015, 10:27 AM)QuantumEnthusiast Wrote:(12-19-2015, 09:55 AM)dissonance Wrote:(12-19-2015, 07:06 AM)QuantumEnthusiast Wrote: Hey Shannon, I just remembered that I read somewhere if the subliminal messages are sped up they become way less effective. You might know this already, just thought I'd let you know anyway in case you were using that method to increase the input as you claim the 5G versions have a massive subliminal data input to your brain. The subconscious can most assuredly understand speech at much higher rates of speed than the conscious mind can. The claims of "not scientifically proven to work" is a red herring that they rely on because the cost and difficulty of doing clinical double blind trials is very high, and it's nearly impossible for small businesses to do those trials. We'll get there, but it'll take a little longer. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-28-2015 I'll state my thoughts on this article in chunks. Quote:Do Subliminal Messages Work? "Typical" by this definition sounds like what I call 1st Generation technology, which was top of the line in the 1970's and 1980's. I think we've discovered that a few newer and more advanced things work by this point. While I don't use it, to the best of my knowledge reversed messaging works. I haven't spent a lot of time studying it. Quote:2) Sped up messages: Embedding the Subliminal Affirmations played at super high speeds. (check the sample of this later in the article) At up to the limit of comprehension, this works. Beyond that limit, of course it fails. But it does work. Quote:3) Silent tracks: Nothing is Embedded, the volume of the affirmations is recorded below anyone’s ability to hear them The way this is described, it's referring to truly ancient techniques. Silent tracks haven't been based on low volume alone since the 1970's. Quote:While these claims sound nice, and are designed to appeal to your desire to believe that your subconscious mind is capable of this incredible feats – They are simple not true. Incorrect. Quote:You are wasting your time and money on marketing fantasy with absolutely no evidence that it works! This is the same as claiming that because you painted Angel wings on your car it will now fly. Sentence number one in this quote is an opinion, and sentence number two is a logical fallacy that does not give me much confidence in the author's knowledge or thinking skills. Besides, how can you waste money if you can get your money back if you don't get the desired results? Quote:The advancement of Neuroscience while freely admitting does not understand many things about the human brain, does understand a tremendous amount, AND more importantly knows what the brain is not capable of. The Sub Conscious mind does not encode a secret message in reversed speech to express your ‘true’ intentions when speaking. Neurons do not respond to stimulus it does not hear, nor can you understand speech speed up at a rate where it is gobbledygook. Modern neuroscience knows a lot, but does it know how much it does not know? Have you noticed that every few months/years/decades, a new fact is confidently paraded forth by science, which discredits or supersedes the one before it? In other words... they don't know. They have some of the puzzle, but not all of it. And misunderstandings, logic errors and assumptions can make that worse. Point #1: The brain is capable of things neuroscience has not yet discovered. This therefore invalidates the idea that they know definitively what it is NOT capable of. Point #2: This author is assuming that the subconscious mind and the brain are one and the same thing, which is definitively not the case. Point #3: Neurons don't hear. Hearing is a result of the combined function of the auditory SYSTEM, not neurons. Point #4: The conscious mind's limits of perception are far and away less than those of the subconscious mind. The statement given assumes that there is no difference between the perceptory range of the conscious and subconscious minds, which was dis proven in the late 1800's when subliminal effect was discovered! Point #5: The conscious mind ccannot comprehend speech at speeds that the subconscious mind can. However, there are limits for moth degrees of awareness, beyond which, yes, it becomes "gobbledygook". Quote:The Science of Subliminal Messaging Not true. Subconscious perceptual limits far outstrip conscious perceptual limits. Quote:You will find that in true recordings you will sometimes hear a muffled sound of the affirmations in the session at certain times. This is when the background music has a rising and lowering volume level and sometimes the affirmations are heard at the low points of volume. For this reason using music is not always the best ‘carrier track’ and something with a steady white noise (like ocean waves) is better. This is an opinion, as hearing those muffled sounds from the subliminal audio is not going to make it any less effective. Quote:Any Subliminal Message Recordings with other claims (reversed, silent, super fast etc) should be a red flag that you are dealing with either a con artist or someone with good intentions but fell into the trap of believing fantasy about what the mind can do and never checked with the real science of what is known. This author's knowledge of the subject is so limited, so biased and so faulty that s/he serves as a prime example of what I talk about when I say... most people think they know everything there is to know about the subject after surfing the net for a few hours. If we never tried to advance the limits of what "real science" knows, we would still be letting blood to cure disease and burning people at the stake. The fact that scientific proof is very expensive is not the fault of those who are working in the field without funds to "scientifically prove" their work. But given a refund policy like we have, and a public forum like we have, AND free full version samples... how on earth could we possibly stay in business if this stuff didn't work?! Hmmm. Quote:There is Absolutely NO EVIDENCE that any Subliminal Message given beyond normal conscious perception (as opposed to masked by a carrier sound) has any effect. NO Study of ANY product has ever produced a result. Corrected version: Quote:There is Absolutely NO EVIDENCE that I am aware of or accept as valid that any Subliminal Message given beyond normal conscious perception (as opposed to masked by a carrier sound) has any effect. NO Study that I know of, or accept as valid, of ANY product has ever produced a result. Which brings me to the final points: People assume they know everything by jumping to conclusions, or studying the subject for very short periods of time. It's a well known fact that people using absolutes in arguments are usually wrong by virtue of the fact that there is indeed precious little under the sun that exists in absolutes instead of shades of gray. Just because you haven't taken the time to look, or refuse to accept it as valid, does not mean it does not exist or is not valid. And, the grammar in the second sentence absolutely assures that the author is wrong, because all trials and studies produce a result, even if the result is "nothing happened". But bypassing the author's terrible use of grammar so far (which invalidates them for being a competent subliminal scripter, by the way) we can respond to what they meant instead of what they literally said with this: Wrong. All in all, it's people like this who are the reason why subliminal sciences are still largely in the stone age. And thank you, because you're only making my job easier by contrast. Keep it up. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - FluffyBunny - 12-28-2015 hey Shannon Is OGSF in MSL ? cause i find that i am associating some fears with implementing my learning like some of the things i read, i would think " this small thing will probly not help me improve my skill over" so i ignore that small thing . and over time i would neglect all the small thing/tactics/skills that i could of learned to use. but i had the fear of thinking this is a stupid thing i wont need it, fear of getting make fun of if i use it . Also i have flexibility issues like i cannot think beyond the example that i am given. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 12-29-2015 Hi Shannon Hope you are starting to feel a bit better. I know the horse may have already bolted, but just wondered if you knew about something called Coldzyme? It's a spray that seems to be very good at preventing colds/flu and also very good at reducing the duration of the cold/flu even if taken after infection. It's worth checking out. I've used it a few times when a sore throat was starting and it nipped the infection in the bud, with no proper cold developing. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 12-30-2015 (12-28-2015, 05:23 PM)Shannon Wrote:(12-18-2015, 04:12 PM)dweller94 Wrote:(12-17-2015, 11:22 PM)Shannon Wrote: OF that's awesome thank you! All the more reason to get OF / OSGF 5G RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 12-31-2015 (12-31-2015, 12:51 PM)FrostedFake Wrote: Shannon, I want the skills and attraction and all that good stuff from SM3, but I like WM for the lifestyle. If I fully engrain both but after that only run WM will it be a situation where I'm living the life of WM but still have SM3's skills and attraction for the ride? Bro, with how difficult it seems to be truly able to gain all the bulletpoints from ONE magnet, doing two, while also running AM to make sure the foundation gets strengthened and solid in order to support the magnets, seems a bit optimistic. Shannon has said that 3 runs, and then most of the program's benefits will be yours, generally. Barring outliers who need more runs. So adding a new program to that, essentially adds 192 days x 3 onto the time. And the magnets have different auras and focuses so they conflict by nature in areas too etc. Honestly, I'd say stick to cycling AM6 and your WM2 and women should be the easiest part of your life after a few runs. It's tough enough to really wrap your head around one magnet, nevermind two. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jakeb203 - 01-01-2016 I think when subliminals stack up they create the most beautiful experience... I have ran AM6 for 2 times with BASE in between. The run after BASE feels pretty special as I definitely have felt that BASE skills are working... such as networking with people, etc. It's not that strong, however. Giving it a number probably would range around 70% compared to I was running BASE. Now I am at AM6 stage 5 nearing the end, I can still feel the impact it is bringing me. BASE programming is definitely weaker but they are there. I seem to have absorbed BASE pretty nicely compared with AM. My Am programming, barring that I have ran both AM5 and Am6 before, diminished around Stage 4 of BASE. However BASE really remained a long time for me... and I did consciously try to maintain this programming during AM because it is very useful. So the conclusion is that for each run through, depending on your resistance, will last longer or shorter for the next run. BASE lasted for a long time also because I created a lifestyle that I used it everyday. If you want to maintain all effects from any subs you use, you need to consciously live the programming. I am working mostly on my business nowadays even during AM, and then hitting the gym (which is what I got from AM) every 2 days. For my future WM and SM run-through I will probably create scenarios such as going out every 3 days or so just so all my programmings can integrate into a beautiful piece. No need to worry about it though if you are willing to use it for the rest of your life (seriously). If you balance out the programming usage, say you run Am-wm-sm for the next 10 years or so, NOT considering any major updates to each, you will get to a point where you live the lifestyle of WM while having attraction and skills from SM. It's just a matter of which one you want more of... if you don't like sex too much then WM, or if you are sex thirsty then SM. Eventually the sub you run more of will overwrite and have more effects than the other. Shannon has answered about the conflicting nature of both subs... Good news that they conflict on the minus part but overall they co-exist. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Womanizer - 01-01-2016 (12-26-2015, 10:55 PM)Alpha360 Wrote: Why apple cider vinegar is so special, what does it do ? any idea? My insane curiosity is speaking. From the little I know it's because of the alkalinity in it. But you can also switch the order you drink to ALKALINE water. Avoid tap water at all costs. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Mystic Pymp - 01-01-2016 (01-01-2016, 06:11 AM)Womanizer Wrote:(12-26-2015, 10:55 PM)Alpha360 Wrote: Why apple cider vinegar is so special, what does it do ? any idea? My insane curiosity is speaking. Every vinegar by definition is acidic, which is like opposite of alkaline. If it was otherwise nobody ever would be worried that apple cider vinegar can damage your teeth. Should have pay more attention in chemistry classes. Just sayin' |