Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 11-09-2016 (11-09-2016, 08:05 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-09-2016, 07:56 PM)Steven Wrote: Shannon, If I'm already a 9 does that mean I'll be perceived as an 11-12? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Frosted - 11-09-2016 Shannon do you believe that the concept of Sigma and Ascendant alpha are a near perfect match or do you believe they are different somehow? Is an ascendant alpha the step above sigma? I've read that the sigma is the equivalent in status of a low alpha male or a high level beta and so I was thinking maybe the ascendant alpha is a more developed sigma who is the equivalent of a high level alpha male. Can't find the link to the site I got my info from. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 11-10-2016 Hi Shannon! I am just curious, you mentioned previously that some of the additions to V3.0.1 will be: 1. Preventing self sabotage. How in depth does this go? 2. Overcoming the self limiting beliefs that hold some of you in place. How in depth does this go? 3. Does this post refer to the first two points only, or are there other things being put into the clearing modules? http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-1233-post-140902.html#pid140902 4. This post in particular interests me due to the large numbers of females I already know. What exactly is going on with this part of the script and how should it function for us? http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-1233-post-141110.html#pid141110 5. What does statement #3 deal with? You never mentioned it compared to the others. http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-1233-post-141427.html#pid141427 6. Statement #4 to AOSI tuning which is designed to cause those affected to change how they perceive the user to being all of what they sexually desire. Also the statement #6 is intriguing. What exactly is going on with these parts of the script and how should they function for us? 7. I'm a bit confused by this recent use of the AOSI term in your posts when the program was renamed DMSI awhile ago. I was just surprised to see that name again and didn't understand what was going on, even the term "AOSI tuning" I'm not familiar with. If you could give some info on each of those points, I'd greatly appreciate it. Some things I'm very interested in and that I feel will have a direct impact on me and my situation, personally. Thanks, Shannon. I'm betting V3.0.1 will get the end goal for at least several guys, it seems like a MAJOR step forward. I'm very excited, these next 3 weeks or whatever it will take to get this in my hands will be slower than molasses. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 11-10-2016 (11-09-2016, 02:34 PM)bits Wrote: I'm not saying looks don't matter or they don't help, but you have to understand where this language of "incel" and "normie" comes from - shut ins who isolate themselves in their room for days on end and don't like interacting with the world. If you want to join them then fine go join them but if you're willing to step outside for a minute you'll see plenty of guys who fit under "genetic trash" with women. The only difference is they bother to leave the house. This make me remember something. When I was in highs school there were a guy who had a below average look, he had acne all over, wasn't tall, wasn't pretty by all those standard and yet had a lot of women with him, girlfriend, friend girls, etc. @ At best that scale would be useful more to rate a woman than a man, as this rating view comes more from a male perspective. But a male perceptive that is very distorted. The only thing I find useful in all that is the broad jaw, all the rest seems distorted. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-10-2016 (11-10-2016, 12:42 AM)CatMan Wrote: 7. I'm a bit confused by this recent use of the AOSI term in your posts when the program was renamed DMSI awhile ago. I was just surprised to see that name again and didn't understand what was going on, even the term "AOSI tuning" I'm not familiar with. "A" stands for "aura," which is the energetic field responsible for communicating a lot of information to other people, so I assume he's tuning the aura programming. Still an aura non-believer? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-10-2016 (11-09-2016, 09:17 PM)ffaux Wrote: Shannon if I've got about a month and a half before I start AM6 again am I better off having a longer break or running stage 7 until x weeks before I start (how many weeks?). I don't feel like I've fully accepted AM6, will stage 7 be detrimental? How does stage 7 compare to stage 6? It seems like stage 6 is meant to be close to the full script from the FAQ? Stage 7 will never be detrimental to use; the issue is that until you've laid the ground work, it will be overwhelming for most people. That's why we still have stages 1 through 6. If I could just build and publish Stage 7, well hell, everyone would be happier. But humans don't grow in binary results. Stage 6 is a final push on some of the last concepts to be worked on, it adds a "glossy varnish coat", and it exalts the SM lead in material. Stage 7 is effectively Stages 1 through 6 all in one stage. Big difference. Stage 7 is intended to be either a way to force march your growth after you have finished stages 1 through 6, but are not "there" yet (which most people find they can't handle the intensity of), or a way to refresh stages 1 through 6 once they have gotten "there". So the question is... do you want to do a 30 mile forced march, or just wait a while and do 5 mile marches at a time? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-10-2016 (11-09-2016, 10:41 PM)robstar Wrote:(11-09-2016, 08:05 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-09-2016, 07:56 PM)Steven Wrote: Shannon, In order to not stagnate while fiddling with all kinds of options on just one section, I have decided to limit the potential of the script to "stunningly attractive" instead of try to push for unearthly beauty. So the program will be attempting to cause them to perceive you as being "stunningly attractive", regardless of how you would appear to them otherwise. In other words... if it succeeds... it would make you a 9, 10 or 11, depending on the person you're dealing with and what they define as a "10". And, of course, how well this actually works... it may need significant tweaking in the future, but it seems to be showing well in the models. I figured I would aim for the stars. Why not. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-10-2016 (11-09-2016, 11:45 PM)Frosted Wrote: Shannon do you believe that the concept of Sigma and Ascendant alpha are a near perfect match or do you believe they are different somehow? Is an ascendant alpha the step above sigma? I've read that the sigma is the equivalent in status of a low alpha male or a high level beta and so I was thinking maybe the ascendant alpha is a more developed sigma who is the equivalent of a high level alpha male. Can't find the link to the site I got my info from. I do not have a current and in depth definition of Sigma Male to work with for comparison. It's been a while since I read the description of that concept. But an ascendant alpha is a high level alpha, one who is so self secure that even self deception on how self secure he is, is unnecessary anymore. It's almost like a state of "enlightenment" for alpha-ness. It in many ways actually transcends what alpha is commonly understood to be. If memory serves, Sigma male was not a low level alpha, but the rogue wolf alpha, who operates outside the normal hierarchy. The ascendant alpha does the same thing, but I don't remember how much of the rest was in common. The ascendant alpha is effectively so alpha that s/he doesn't need anyone else to know it, and doesn't even care if they know it, as long as they are being treated with a reasonable amount of decency and respect. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-10-2016 (11-10-2016, 12:42 AM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon! 62.125 centimeters deep. It's designed, as part of the healing/clearing module, to tunnel as deep and broad as necessary to achieve it's goal, given enough time and exposure. Quote:2. Overcoming the self limiting beliefs that hold some of you in place. How in depth does this go? See the answer to Q1. Quote:3. Does this post refer to the first two points only, or are there other things being put into the clearing modules? http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-1233-post-140902.html#pid140902 The additions to the clearing modules are aimed at being the equivalent of Seal Team Six: small grouping, highly focused, and exactly what is necessary to get the job done. In other words, highly focused and highly polymorphic - but not "at your own pace". Quote:4. This post in particular interests me due to the large numbers of females I already know. What exactly is going on with this part of the script and how should it function for us? http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-1233-post-141110.html#pid141110 It is aimed at being similar in effect to Allo-THDOC and others, in effect a subliminal result like that of the "reset" pheromone(s). It's aimed at triggering the affected brain to decide that their previous classification of you is in error, and change it to "must fuck - NOW." How long this takes, how well this works, and what tweaks it needs (if any) remain to be seen. But we are going to try it. Quote:5. What does statement #3 deal with? You never mentioned it compared to the others. http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-1233-post-141427.html#pid141427 #1 aims to cause them to perceive you as being stunningly attractive. #2 aims to cause them to perceive you as being much higher value than they are. #3 aims to cause them to perceive you as being their ideal sexual choice and higher value than they are in terms of status. #4 aims to add to #3 by getting them to perceive you as being everything they want and need sexually, and in a sexual partner. And #5, which I have not started working on, will be aimed at causing a "celebrity" level status enhancement, and causing them to see it as being "no big deal" to approach because there is already a familiarity and level of comfort present that would result from having already had amazing sex with the user, and being comfortable with approaching and initiating, regardless of the stunning nature of their status and good looks. This one is going to be very hard to pull off because it is sort of a self contradiction, but I will try. Quote:6. Statement #4 to AOSI tuning which is designed to cause those affected to change how they perceive the user to being all of what they sexually desire. Also the statement #6 is intriguing. What exactly is going on with these parts of the script and how should they function for us? It's attempting to alter the perception of the affected person primarily through your energy field, but also uses every other possible avenue: body language, speech patterns, attitude, choices, actions, etc. to convey these things. I'm not sure what you are referring to with "statement #6". Quote:7. I'm a bit confused by this recent use of the AOSI term in your posts when the program was renamed DMSI awhile ago. I was just surprised to see that name again and didn't understand what was going on, even the term "AOSI tuning" I'm not familiar with. AOSI is no longer the name of the program, but it as an acronym still makes things easier than typing "aura of sexual irresistibility" all the time. Quote:If you could give some info on each of those points, I'd greatly appreciate it. Some things I'm very interested in and that I feel will have a direct impact on me and my situation, personally. It is a huge step up, which is why it's 3.0.1 instead of 2.6. But it is a huge step up, so it will introduce a lot of new stuff that will doubtless need tweaking in the future, so I am pretty sure the "final" will be in the 3.x branch, but not 3.0.1. I know it;s human nature to be excited and get your hopes up, but it will be better for both of us if you remain neutral and simply observe and report. No expectations. We don't know how well a lot of this will, or even can, work yet. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-10-2016 Shannon, I know it's been a while since US 3G, but if you were to use it alongside a manifestation sub and only focused on that, approximately how much would it boost the speed / success rate? And also, I read a story on the forum about how you used MUWAS for almost a year and got results, was there anything else you were using with it? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-10-2016 (11-10-2016, 07:05 AM)Cozy Wrote: Shannon, I know it's been a while since US 3G, but if you were to use it alongside a manifestation sub and only focused on that, approximately how much would it boost the speed / success rate? Q1: I don't know. Theoretically, it might help. Then again, it might distract and reduce energy to the goal, too... Q2: No. I try to practice what I preach, even though lately that has been impossible for reasons outside my control. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 11-10-2016 (11-10-2016, 07:05 AM)Shannon Wrote: It is aimed at being similar in effect to Allo-THDOC and others, in effect a subliminal result like that of the "reset" pheromone(s). It's aimed at triggering the affected brain to decide that their previous classification of you is in error, and change it to "must **** - NOW." 1) So we have the TAC effect and now the Allo-THDOC effect. Can you put in the 3ß-Androstanediol effect(s) too? (I think that was the secret ingredient in the raved about and legendary A314 versions.) 2) I think you also mentioned that there was a classification of "must **** - NOW and FOREVER". Is that still in there? 3) In terms of the aims being contradictory, it seems to me women (and even many people) live in an inner world of contradictions so I would expect you could pull this off. 4) Seems all these aims are consistent with a woman being sexually motivated. Higher value than themselves in status. Everything they want and need sexually and as a sexual partner. Familiarity. Comfort. And the celebrity status (which I'm guessing includes feelings of awe and admiration). I know logically this may appear as contradictions, but I think sex has a logic of it's own, and I think this all fits well together. Besides I don't think a woman is going to say "Hey! Wait a minute! Why do I think of this guy like my favorite celebrity yet it just feels so natural and normal?" Even if she does wonder, I think she'll be "too busy wanting to hold on to and enjoy the feelings and reinforcing those feelings to effectively maintain them". But then again, perhaps that should be added too just to be safe. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-10-2016 (11-10-2016, 07:41 AM)Steven Wrote:(11-10-2016, 07:05 AM)Shannon Wrote: It is aimed at being similar in effect to Allo-THDOC and others, in effect a subliminal result like that of the "reset" pheromone(s). It's aimed at triggering the affected brain to decide that their previous classification of you is in error, and change it to "must **** - NOW." One step at a time, my friend. I'm working on it. Quote:2) I think you also mentioned that there was a classification of "must **** - NOW and FOREVER". Is that still in there? In the wording that won the modeling runs. Maybe not exactly like that... Quote:3) In terms of the aims being contradictory, it seems to me women (and even many people) live in an inner world of contradictions so I would expect you could pull this off. We are certainly going to try. Quote:4) Seems all these aims are consistent with a woman being sexually motivated. Higher value than themselves in status. Everything they want and need sexually and as a sexual partner. Familiarity. Comfort. And the celebrity status (which I'm guessing includes feelings of awe and admiration). I know logically this may appear as contradictions, but I think sex has a logic of it's own, and I think this all fits well together. I may have to adjust some of that to be polymorphic in the future to keep it truly gender unspecified in user base, but we will take it as it comes. Quote:Besides I don't think a woman is going to say "Hey! Wait a minute! Why do I think of this guy like my favorite celebrity yet it just feels so natural and normal?" Even if she does wonder, I think she'll be "too busy wanting to hold on to and enjoy the feelings and reinforcing those feelings to effectively maintain them". But then again, perhaps that should be added too just to be safe. The reactions I am triggering are below the threshhold of consciousness at first, and they are not coming through the neo-cortex. The parts of the rain processing these are not capable of logic. That's why you say "sex has a logic of it's own". What you're saying is that women (and men probably are too) are in large part irrational when it comes to sex. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 11-10-2016 (11-10-2016, 07:46 AM)Shannon Wrote: What you're saying is that women (and men probably are too) are in large part irrational when it comes to sex. Exactly. Haven't there been allegations in history that a man's choice of sexual partners led to the downfall of his empire? Not logical at all. Also, what about an effect in v3.x about "those affected feel concerned/worried that the user may not want to have sex with them and/or not have sex with them". I realize you might not want to use worried or nervous, but I don't know how else to convey that particular concept of both moving towards sex with the user (excited anticipation about having sex with the user AND relief when they finally do have sex with the user, and please the user) and away from not having sex with the user because I think both to and away from are necessary. Also perhaps this could be a recursive loop that builds as time passes when not having sex with the user. |