+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016
(11-07-2016, 09:50 AM)mat422 Wrote: Hey Shannon, I asked you this in my journal but I figure I might catch you here. It's been a while since I've run AM and I'm thinking it would do me some good. I only have 5.0 at the moment, haven't been able to buy 6 yet. Having said that I'm taking a break from E2. What's your opinion on 5.0? I can't remember where you stood on it because 5.0 was supposed to be the last one. Anyway it was either that or ASC. I'm leaning more towards ASC to see if maybe it can help me land a better job and then from there buy AM6. But I wanted to know your opinion. Especially since I've grown so accustomed to the 5G tech.
I would not recommend 5.0 if you can afford 6.0, but not because it benefits me in any particular way; rather, it's because the advancement of technology is such that one is many times better than the other. Regardless of whatever anyone stuck on the "no pain, no gain" bullshit may say or think.
If you have 5.0 and you can't afford 6.0, 5.0 is better than ASC. But I would go for 6.0 if you can.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-07-2016
(11-07-2016, 10:37 AM)Shannon Wrote: I don't mind you guys having access to V1, if Ben is willing to link it up as an add on to the current 2.5. I would actually like to see how you think it compares to 2.4/2.5.
I may be game. Any testing protocol or anything you're looking for in particular?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016
(11-07-2016, 11:00 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-07-2016, 10:37 AM)Shannon Wrote: I don't mind you guys having access to V1, if Ben is willing to link it up as an add on to the current 2.5. I would actually like to see how you think it compares to 2.4/2.5.
I may be game. Any testing protocol or anything you're looking for in particular?
I don't really remember if we were doing a specific number of loops of V1. If we were, do that.
If not... well, I don't know what to tell you for how many loops to use it for... maybe use it for the same number of loops as 2.5 gets?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Duke.Togo - 11-07-2016
(11-07-2016, 11:16 AM)Shannon Wrote:(11-07-2016, 11:00 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-07-2016, 10:37 AM)Shannon Wrote: I don't mind you guys having access to V1, if Ben is willing to link it up as an add on to the current 2.5. I would actually like to see how you think it compares to 2.4/2.5.
I may be game. Any testing protocol or anything you're looking for in particular?
I don't really remember if we were doing a specific number of loops of V1. If we were, do that.
If not... well, I don't know what to tell you for how many loops to use it for... maybe use it for the same number of loops as 2.5 gets?
I would also be game for testing out V1. If Ben can link it, I would happily keep a journal for it with some of my experiences on it.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 11-07-2016
Shannon,
"I'd like to cause it to trigger them not just sexually, but in all the ways that person needs to respond by initiating and having sex with the user. I think this is a big issue right now - it's lopsided. Too much sexual and not enough of whatever else is needed and desired."
I think this is right on.
It seems that even if she feels disinhibited, and turned on, etc. there needed to be something else. I thought of it as comfort or safety or "appropriateness" but I couldn't quite articulate it.
Perhaps if the aura could guide the receivers' and the user's unconscious to do what is needed to create the conditions to achieve the goals of the program. I'm sure you can word it better, and I'm guessing it would have to be dynamic to the person, situation, etc.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - OberynMartell - 11-07-2016
If I could test v1 again I would gladly do that. That was the version where I really felt like a chick magnet, girls were really showing interest, staring blatantly, trying to rip my shirt off. However I also remember sweating like a pig feeling hot all the time. I'm not saying it was better than v2.5, don't get me wrong. But I haven't felt the attention from girls like on v1.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - hunk - 11-07-2016
(11-07-2016, 10:37 AM)Shannon Wrote:(11-07-2016, 08:36 AM)K-Train Wrote: Number 3, for those of us who purchased DMSI can we request one of the older versions talking specifically about V1)?
I don't mind you guys having access to V1, if Ben is willing to link it up as an add on to the current 2.5. I would actually like to see how you think it compares to 2.4/2.5.
Yay! That's great news. I've been using v2.4 and v2.5 and would love to be able to try v1. From what I've read here, it was probably the most successful version as far as achieving the program goals is concerned - with side effects, of course.
@Ben: Would you please do the honours when you get a chance? Thank you.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-07-2016
Just found my old AOSI journal. Looks like the protocol was two loops run back to back. Thinking about loading her up. My kiddo will be with her mom this weekend and I'm looking to get the old chocolateydiggitydoo wet.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-07-2016
I'd like feedback on how V1 compares to V2.4/2.5.
Ben, please link V1 as an add on to the downloads for V2.5, so that people can download either or both if they like.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 11-07-2016
Don't tell me twice
, V1 for tonight. Let's see how powerful it is.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-07-2016
Just loaded it up. Running my two loops, then heading to boxing. After that, I'll cruise around the grocery store for a bit. If I recall, last time I went to Wal-Mart on v1, I had these women follow me around like puppies.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 11-07-2016
Here is what you said Shannon on the loop on V1:
Quote:Shannon Wrote:
Try 4 first. Spend some time at that level. Let's see if that makes a difference. So far the pattern from the models seems to be showing a progression of 1-2-4-8 hours of exposure being significant.
(06-15-2016 01:31 AM)Shannon Wrote:
According to the models in a conglomerate view, the results seem to decrease more than anything else doing more than 8 loops per day. And it is loops, not hours, since each run through is 75 minutes.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-07-2016
@Alpha360:
Good catch. Just dawned on me, I was only running 2 loops because I was running it with AM6. That means I'll be able up the loops now.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - hunk - 11-07-2016
(11-07-2016, 12:33 PM)Shannon Wrote: I'd like feedback on how V1 compares to V2.4/2.5.
Ben, please link V1 as an add on to the downloads for V2.5, so that people can download either or both if they like.
Hi Shannon,
Since we're requesting Ben to make the old version of dmsi available, do you think it'll be possible to have/buy the single stage version of BASE please? (the one which was made available for a limited time)
I have purchased BASE v2.1 (5G), but would like to run the single stager after DMSI.
I believe some other forum members had requested for single stager BASE to be made available again here (during last couple of weeks):
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-post-138425.html#pid138425
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-post-138480.html#pid138480
http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-5838-post-138651.html#pid138651