Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-06-2016 And not to mention, NSFM and OAA doesn't just help with cold approach, it helps with ANY kind of seduction attempts. This sounds like some serious fear of having to say "hello" to a woman, so you're hamstering TALKING TO WOMEN IN PUBLIC as low value. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - posh - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 10:58 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 10:40 AM)posh Wrote: Low value men do cold approach. Go to oxford street London and you will see low value pua pu$$y beggers going around approach women over and over again with no result. There was even vids of a virgin deformed guy cold approaching. Guess what women do not give him the time of day. Hes treated like trash. any average or below average men need not bother approaching women. Women pre-select men. They will be treated like trash by women. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 11:02 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: And not to mention, NSFW and OAA doesn't just help with cold approach, it helps with ANY kind of seduction attempts. Spot on, I for one need this and I can only see it contributing to the goals of DMSI. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Breeze - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 11:08 AM)posh Wrote:(11-06-2016, 10:58 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 10:40 AM)posh Wrote: Low value men do cold approach. Go to oxford street London and you will see low value pua pu$$y beggers going around approach women over and over again with no result. There was even vids of a virgin deformed guy cold approaching. Guess what women do not give him the time of day. Hes treated like trash. Thanks for the laugh. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-06-2016 I don't care how attractive you are as a man, even if you're Justin Bieber or Drake. As soon as you approach a woman, you are giving up some of your power to her, even if it's temporary. I'd like to see the tables turned and women approach and go through hoops for us. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Mystic Pymp - 11-06-2016 Hey Shannon! Could you please read my journal update I've posted >>HERE<< and offer me the best option for continuation right now? In short I've been using DMSI 2.4 -> 2.5 for 2 months now, switched to 2.4 again yesterday but I'm dealing with some serious neediness for some time now, more so than I can remember in a long time. I see some results from the sub but I can't seem to be able to follow-through on them, so I consider switching to some other, more beneficial sub. I'll appreciate your output and thanks in advance! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - hsindermann - 11-06-2016 Some people's posts here sure sound as if they should get back to a DMSI version with clearing, as they still have pretty heavy emotional baggage with women... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 09:21 AM)RTBoss Wrote:(11-06-2016, 01:26 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:(11-06-2016, 01:09 AM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:Let's keep DMSI focused on being pursued, not the pursuer. You're putting words into my mouth now. I didn't say they are lazy cause they refuse to cold approach per se. I believe it isn't for everyone. I used 'lazy' to refer to people who make comments that they shouldn't have to do anything and it's all up to the girl to make a move on him. I'm not the only one who shares these thoughts either. If you're afraid to make a move and all, it's fine to admit it. We have all struggled with that. That's why we may need OAA and NSFM in the program. But like Ben said earlier, cause of the design goals of DMSI, it's making a lotta guys lazy thinking they needn't do anything cause they expect DMSI to do all the work for them (getting the girl to come up to them and seduce them all the way). What I'm saying is stop treating DMSI as the magic pill. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 12:35 PM)2Cozy Wrote: I don't care how attractive you are as a man, even if you're Justin Bieber or Drake. As soon as you approach a woman, you are giving up some of your power to her, even if it's temporary. I'd like to see the tables turned and women approach and go through hoops for us. What the fuck is happening to this forum?! Yes, it's going to be nice to see the tables turned and watch them approach us, but giving away your power? No -- your power lies in your expansive, masculine and natural inclination toward action. Not to mention, would you even know how to handle a 9/10 coming on to you in the mall in front of everyone? Some of ya'll can't even say hello to a woman, and you're railing against Shannon including training on how to do so... but you think you can handle sudden leaps of attraction? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 12:52 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 12:35 PM)2Cozy Wrote: I don't care how attractive you are as a man, even if you're Justin Bieber or Drake. As soon as you approach a woman, you are giving up some of your power to her, even if it's temporary. I'd like to see the tables turned and women approach and go through hoops for us. As a matter of fact I would lol, it wouldn't be a big deal to me, I would treat her like anyone else. Don't project your limitations onto me. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 12:44 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:(11-06-2016, 09:21 AM)RTBoss Wrote:(11-06-2016, 01:26 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:(11-06-2016, 01:09 AM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:Let's keep DMSI focused on being pursued, not the pursuer. Thanks for clarifying. I think a lot of these guys are just plain afraid. Like Chaos said, they want to be approached and experience the high attraction, but if it happened, would they know how to handle it? People who don't have any social skills are probably SOL with this sub. Teaching people what to do after being approached or while interacting with women in general is beyond the scope of DMSI. Even so, it will be nice to see reports like, "I got asked to fuck today, and I said 'You're not perfect but I like your fat sacks, they're really big!' and then she slapped me across the face.'" hahaha RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-06-2016 (11-05-2016, 06:33 AM)THolt Wrote:(11-04-2016, 09:24 PM)Shannon Wrote:(11-04-2016, 09:21 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon! Still working on Beast 9. Been working mostly on DMSI, MIR2, MHS. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-06-2016 (11-05-2016, 08:17 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: I can't seem to find the answer on the forums. Simple question. I suggest 1 to 4, according to what feels right for you. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-06-2016 (11-05-2016, 08:21 AM)Banksy Wrote: Hi Shannon, if I'm resisting a program, why would I feel calm and relaxed when the program is playing and only feel resistance when I'm not playing it? It's possible that what you're experiencing isn't resistance. It's possible that you are resisting execution, which is not happening during input mode because so much priority is being put on input processing, decoding, comprehension and storage. Could be other things, but I can't say. |