Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-06-2016

And not to mention, NSFM and OAA doesn't just help with cold approach, it helps with ANY kind of seduction attempts.

This sounds like some serious fear of having to say "hello" to a woman, so you're hamstering TALKING TO WOMEN IN PUBLIC as low value.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - posh - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 10:58 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 10:40 AM)posh Wrote: Low value men do cold approach. Go to oxford street London and you will see low value pua pu$$y beggers going around approach women over and over again with no result. There was even vids of a virgin deformed guy cold approaching. Guess what women do not give him the time of day. Hes treated like trash.

If women like you enough they will approach you.

Do you see the likes of justin bieber and drake cold approach??? nah they get approached and the women would do anything to get their sperm. This is basic common sense

What's common sense is this:

You're being completely illogical here by relying on absolute outliers to make your arguments. You went from one end of the spectrum (a virgin deformed guy) to freaking Justin Bieber and Drake, skipping over the entire continuum of below average to average to above average men in the process.

any average or below average men need not bother approaching women. Women pre-select men. They will be treated like trash by women.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dweller94 - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 11:02 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: And not to mention, NSFW and OAA doesn't just help with cold approach, it helps with ANY kind of seduction attempts.

Spot on, I for one need this and I can only see it contributing to the goals of DMSI.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Breeze - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 11:08 AM)posh Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 10:58 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 10:40 AM)posh Wrote: Low value men do cold approach. Go to oxford street London and you will see low value pua pu$$y beggers going around approach women over and over again with no result. There was even vids of a virgin deformed guy cold approaching. Guess what women do not give him the time of day. Hes treated like trash.

If women like you enough they will approach you.

Do you see the likes of justin bieber and drake cold approach??? nah they get approached and the women would do anything to get their sperm. This is basic common sense

What's common sense is this:

You're being completely illogical here by relying on absolute outliers to make your arguments. You went from one end of the spectrum (a virgin deformed guy) to freaking Justin Bieber and Drake, skipping over the entire continuum of below average to average to above average men in the process.

any average or below average men need not bother approaching women. Women pre-select men. They will be treated like trash by women.

Thanks for the laugh. Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-06-2016

I don't care how attractive you are as a man, even if you're Justin Bieber or Drake. As soon as you approach a woman, you are giving up some of your power to her, even if it's temporary. I'd like to see the tables turned and women approach and go through hoops for us.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Mystic Pymp - 11-06-2016

Hey Shannon! Could you please read my journal update I've posted >>HERE<< and offer me the best option for continuation right now? In short I've been using DMSI 2.4 -> 2.5 for 2 months now, switched to 2.4 again yesterday but I'm dealing with some serious neediness for some time now, more so than I can remember in a long time. I see some results from the sub but I can't seem to be able to follow-through on them, so I consider switching to some other, more beneficial sub.

I'll appreciate your output and thanks in advance!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - hsindermann - 11-06-2016

Some people's posts here sure sound as if they should get back to a DMSI version with clearing, as they still have pretty heavy emotional baggage with women...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 09:21 AM)RTBoss Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 01:26 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 01:09 AM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:Let's keep DMSI focused on being pursued, not the pursuer.

I disagree with this, though I seem to be in the minority thinking this.

Despite the goal it's important to still be able to deal with the fears and stuff so you CAN talk to girls when you want and move it forward instead of being forced to be passive and wait for them to do it.

Or because of having a mentality of "they should be doing it with this program" that you're falling into. I've even seen it to the extreme of someone being like "Oh this woman come right next to me and smiled big at me but I did nothing because she's meant to do it with DMSI".

Maybe not exactly that but close.

Yes it would be cool having these attractive girls talk to me, I do get it occasionally. But I don't feel that the option to talk to them should be eliminated and it sounds like that is where some guys want it to head. Personally I don't, why not the ability for either.

As a side note, coincidentally from my experience as i've had less 'baggage' around initiating myself, for example when it just flows for me, or when some fear is cleared I actually have girls responding better and sometimes initiate with me without me having to. If you still have all the baggage and fear around initiating it also holds them back from initiating. Sounds weird I know, but i've found that's how it has worked.

Well said! I feel like it is turning into this lazy route for many users. They see a girl hovering around and looking at them. "Oh I refuse to do anything, cause the goal of DMSI is supposed to get women to make a move on me." Are you really gonna cockblock yourself? Just make things easier for the both of you. Say hi to her. She is hoping you would, so make it happen.

No one said anything about not responding to women. Shannon's focus for the program is getting women to initiate, not getting the men to do nothing. He's just not promoting men to "do the work," not keeping them from it. Big difference.

Are people worried that, if approached, users will self-cockblock or mess up the opportunity that's presented, thus feeling the inclusion of Natural Seduction will help out? I don't know. I do know that I'll defer to Shannon's expertise. He's the man who writes the script!

Also, Wolverine, since you're a proponent of the "just do it," attitude - and repeatedly call people who aren't cold approaching lazy - how bout you just get laid already, or are you too lazy to escalate? Clearly everyone is at a different place with women, let's have a little leniency with those who aren't where we are, eh?

You're putting words into my mouth now. I didn't say they are lazy cause they refuse to cold approach per se. I believe it isn't for everyone. I used 'lazy' to refer to people who make comments that they shouldn't have to do anything and it's all up to the girl to make a move on him. I'm not the only one who shares these thoughts either. If you're afraid to make a move and all, it's fine to admit it. We have all struggled with that. That's why we may need OAA and NSFM in the program. But like Ben said earlier, cause of the design goals of DMSI, it's making a lotta guys lazy thinking they needn't do anything cause they expect DMSI to do all the work for them (getting the girl to come up to them and seduce them all the way). What I'm saying is stop treating DMSI as the magic pill.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 12:35 PM)2Cozy Wrote: I don't care how attractive you are as a man, even if you're Justin Bieber or Drake. As soon as you approach a woman, you are giving up some of your power to her, even if it's temporary. I'd like to see the tables turned and women approach and go through hoops for us.

What the fuck is happening to this forum?!

Yes, it's going to be nice to see the tables turned and watch them approach us, but giving away your power? No -- your power lies in your expansive, masculine and natural inclination toward action. Not to mention, would you even know how to handle a 9/10 coming on to you in the mall in front of everyone?

Some of ya'll can't even say hello to a woman, and you're railing against Shannon including training on how to do so... but you think you can handle sudden leaps of attraction?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Cozy - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 12:52 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 12:35 PM)2Cozy Wrote: I don't care how attractive you are as a man, even if you're Justin Bieber or Drake. As soon as you approach a woman, you are giving up some of your power to her, even if it's temporary. I'd like to see the tables turned and women approach and go through hoops for us.

What the **** is happening to this forum?!

Yes, it's going to be nice to see the tables turned and watch them approach us, but giving away your power? No -- your power lies in your expansive, masculine and natural inclination toward action. Not to mention, would you even know how to handle a 9/10 coming on to you in the mall in front of everyone?

Some of ya'll can't even say hello to a woman, and you're railing against Shannon including training on how to do so... but you think you can handle sudden leaps of attraction?

As a matter of fact I would lol, it wouldn't be a big deal to me, I would treat her like anyone else. Don't project your limitations onto me.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-06-2016

(11-06-2016, 12:44 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 09:21 AM)RTBoss Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 01:26 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:
(11-06-2016, 01:09 AM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:Let's keep DMSI focused on being pursued, not the pursuer.

I disagree with this, though I seem to be in the minority thinking this.

Despite the goal it's important to still be able to deal with the fears and stuff so you CAN talk to girls when you want and move it forward instead of being forced to be passive and wait for them to do it.

Or because of having a mentality of "they should be doing it with this program" that you're falling into. I've even seen it to the extreme of someone being like "Oh this woman come right next to me and smiled big at me but I did nothing because she's meant to do it with DMSI".

Maybe not exactly that but close.

Yes it would be cool having these attractive girls talk to me, I do get it occasionally. But I don't feel that the option to talk to them should be eliminated and it sounds like that is where some guys want it to head. Personally I don't, why not the ability for either.

As a side note, coincidentally from my experience as i've had less 'baggage' around initiating myself, for example when it just flows for me, or when some fear is cleared I actually have girls responding better and sometimes initiate with me without me having to. If you still have all the baggage and fear around initiating it also holds them back from initiating. Sounds weird I know, but i've found that's how it has worked.

Well said! I feel like it is turning into this lazy route for many users. They see a girl hovering around and looking at them. "Oh I refuse to do anything, cause the goal of DMSI is supposed to get women to make a move on me." Are you really gonna cockblock yourself? Just make things easier for the both of you. Say hi to her. She is hoping you would, so make it happen.

No one said anything about not responding to women. Shannon's focus for the program is getting women to initiate, not getting the men to do nothing. He's just not promoting men to "do the work," not keeping them from it. Big difference.

Are people worried that, if approached, users will self-cockblock or mess up the opportunity that's presented, thus feeling the inclusion of Natural Seduction will help out? I don't know. I do know that I'll defer to Shannon's expertise. He's the man who writes the script!

Also, Wolverine, since you're a proponent of the "just do it," attitude - and repeatedly call people who aren't cold approaching lazy - how bout you just get laid already, or are you too lazy to escalate? Clearly everyone is at a different place with women, let's have a little leniency with those who aren't where we are, eh?

You're putting words into my mouth now. I didn't say they are lazy cause they refuse to cold approach per se. I believe it isn't for everyone. I used 'lazy' to refer to people who make comments that they shouldn't have to do anything and it's all up to the girl to make a move on him. I'm not the only one who shares these thoughts either. If you're afraid to make a move and all, it's fine to admit it. We have all struggled with that. That's why we may need OAA and NSFM in the program. But like Ben said earlier, cause of the design goals of DMSI, it's making a lotta guys lazy thinking they needn't do anything cause they expect DMSI to do all the work for them (getting the girl to come up to them and seduce them all the way). What I'm saying is stop treating DMSI as the magic pill.

Thanks for clarifying. I think a lot of these guys are just plain afraid. Like Chaos said, they want to be approached and experience the high attraction, but if it happened, would they know how to handle it?

People who don't have any social skills are probably SOL with this sub. Teaching people what to do after being approached or while interacting with women in general is beyond the scope of DMSI. Even so, it will be nice to see reports like, "I got asked to fuck today, and I said 'You're not perfect but I like your fat sacks, they're really big!' and then she slapped me across the face.'" hahaha


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-06-2016

(11-05-2016, 06:33 AM)THolt Wrote:
(11-04-2016, 09:24 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(11-04-2016, 09:21 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon!

The other day, you mentioned how you were spending the whole day working on DMSI V3.0.1.

How did that go? And how far along is it, when can we expect it's release? (As you can tell, I am eager to get the "self sabotage" and "removing limiting beliefs" programming, lol). I remember you said sometime in November, I just wanted to know how it's progressing as it sounds like a VERY juicy upgrade.

No lie, it will be an early Christmas present to me.

That day was spent working on the 6G prototype, because there are some very interesting developments going on in terms of reality bending/overcoming resistance/neutralizing self sabotage coming up in the 6G prototype that I want in 3.0. So it was sort of working on one to develop the other.

Having a hard time finding sufficient time for this lately, but that's going to change real quick. I'm going to set some boundaries, because people start thinking that I can spend my time doing whatever just because I am working from home now.

People are strange that way. "Oh, you work from home? Obviously you don't really work so let's **** around and do useless shit that wastes your time." Seems to be the thinking.

So what Beast variation are you on now? Beast 10?

Still working on Beast 9. Been working mostly on DMSI, MIR2, MHS.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-06-2016

(11-05-2016, 08:17 AM)AbundanceCH Wrote: I can't seem to find the answer on the forums. Simple question.

I'll be finishing BASE in december. How many days/weeks do I have to wait till I can do the following? Still undecided but i'll opt for one of these options. Not sure what the proper break time should be.
a) run another 5g subliminal 1 stager or
b) rerun BASE

I suggest 1 to 4, according to what feels right for you.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 11-06-2016

(11-05-2016, 08:21 AM)Banksy Wrote: Hi Shannon, if I'm resisting a program, why would I feel calm and relaxed when the program is playing and only feel resistance when I'm not playing it?

Is it because I myself am not resisting the program but my reality / the people around me are? Is it because my personality is not ready to handle the change? Or maybe because I'm depending on these people?

It's possible that what you're experiencing isn't resistance.

It's possible that you are resisting execution, which is not happening during input mode because so much priority is being put on input processing, decoding, comprehension and storage.

Could be other things, but I can't say.