![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Ricardo - 11-06-2016 Shannon has already said that nsfm conflicts with the goal of DMSI so why introduce comflicts when we don't know why DMSI isn't working in the first place? Too many guys here have this limiting belief that guys must do all the chasing and with nsfm we are just getting further away from the goal of DMSI. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 11-06-2016 (11-04-2016, 09:21 PM)Shannon Wrote: It's in there. May not stay in there after 3.0... it's counter to the program's goals. Isn't the programs goal explicitly stated in the title? "Maximum sexual irresistibility"? Which is about more than just looks, and an aura. It also includes having a charming personality, knowing how to talk, touch etc. I'm not talking about pursuing women here, purely in the realm of being pursued, these things are all useful and would aid the programs goals. And there's also having the ability to take the relationship in whatever direction you want it after sex happens, which I'm sure is an ability everyone would love to have. I think if 3.0 makes it clear that nfsm takes away energy from the rest of the program it should be removed but if it doesn't and it only compliments it why not keep it? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - robstar - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 07:41 AM)Ricardo Wrote: Shannon has already said that nsfm conflicts with the goal of DMSI so why introduce comflicts when we don't know why DMSI isn't working in the first place? Too many guys here have this limiting belief that guys must do all the chasing and with nsfm we are just getting further away from the goal of DMSI. It's not about chasing, even if a girl is super attracted and comes to you wanting sex, if you do or say something stupid, beta or socially retarded, she's gonna leave. We need to consider this realistically. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 11-06-2016 Agree 100% with Mr. Anderson. I also think it benefits Shannon's efforts greatly by having a wide variety of individuals with different philosophies to test this that way we can test every facet of DMSI in terms of its ability to improve seduction and its ability to get targets/attractive individuals to initiate the approach on the user. So having people like Catman who are dedicated to testing out the program's primary goal is beneficial until its been established and confirmed by Shannon that the primary goal (getting attractive people to approach the user) is unacheivable on a consistent basis. Ricardo Wrote:Shannon has already said that nsfm conflicts with the goal of DMSI so why introduce comflicts when we don't know why DMSI isn't working in the first place? Too many guys here have this limiting belief that guys must do all the chasing and with nsfm we are just getting further away from the goal of DMSI. I agree that until Shannon explicitly says "Sorry guys, it ain't possible" that we shouldn't completely abandon the program's primary goal which is to get attractive individuals to approach the user. The thing is that Shannon has already said that he expects multiple versions within the V3 series so having one version with NSFM in it can be beneficial later on IF Shannon discovers that the program's main goal is too lofty because then he can go back, check reports, and if it turns out NSFM was able to allow guys to improve their success with women...then hell, he'll still have a viable product that he can sell. EDIT: I just saw Robstar's comment and I agree. That's my main concern when it comes to the "wait for her to approach" thing. Even if she approaches you have to be able to not screw things up. Believe me Catman and Ricardo, I want this shit too work just as much as you guys, so we're on the same page here guys ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 01:09 AM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:Let's keep DMSI focused on being pursued, not the pursuer. Where did Shannon ever say the subliminal eliminates the option to speak to women? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 01:26 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:(11-06-2016, 01:09 AM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:Let's keep DMSI focused on being pursued, not the pursuer. No one said anything about not responding to women. Shannon's focus for the program is getting women to initiate, not getting the men to do nothing. He's just not promoting men to "do the work," not keeping them from it. Big difference. Are people worried that, if approached, users will self-cockblock or mess up the opportunity that's presented, thus feeling the inclusion of Natural Seduction will help out? I don't know. I do know that I'll defer to Shannon's expertise. He's the man who writes the script! Also, Wolverine, since you're a proponent of the "just do it," attitude - and repeatedly call people who aren't cold approaching lazy - how bout you just get laid already, or are you too lazy to escalate? Clearly everyone is at a different place with women, let's have a little leniency with those who aren't where we are, eh? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bits - 11-06-2016 I don't understand why the choice is so binary, isn't it possible to have both? Maximize DMSI to have women approach you, but also give you the ability to approach women? If people want to hold back from approaching and judge the programs effectiveness based on it's goals then that's perfectly fair but I don't see how including NSFM would be a bad thing for DMSI. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - posh - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 09:21 AM)RTBoss Wrote:(11-06-2016, 01:26 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote:(11-06-2016, 01:09 AM)Benjamin Wrote:Quote:Let's keep DMSI focused on being pursued, not the pursuer. Legit post I paid for dmsi which said it would make women approach and try to fuk me. I did no pay to be a cold approaching pu$$y begger. High value men do not need to cold approach women RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bits - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 09:49 AM)posh Wrote: Legit post I paid for dmsi which said it would make women approach and try to fuk me. They don't cold approach the way most guys would approach 20 different women but they for sure do "warm approaches" where the woman makes it blatantly obvious like this: ![]() If the guy doesn't approach she assumes he's rejecting her, if he does then she makes it very easy for him. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 09:49 AM)posh Wrote: Legit post I paid for dmsi which said it would make women approach and try to fuk me. First point, true. Second point, kinda true -- but I get what you're saying. Third point, dawg wtf??? Shannon already knows what the design goal is -- to get women to approach us instead of us having to do the work. And if you bought DMSI expecting that, you're very much entitled to your refund ONCE the final version comes out and IF it doesn't perform to expectations. But... we don't have to lie about reality to get what we want. Low value men don't cold approach women because they're too afraid of being shamed or ostracized for the attempt. High value men do whatever they want -- including approaching women because they don't fear any repercussions, plus they're so self-assured of their value that they know the woman won't reject the approach. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - posh - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 10:19 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(11-06-2016, 09:49 AM)posh Wrote: Legit post I paid for dmsi which said it would make women approach and try to fuk me. Low value men do cold approach. Go to oxford street London and you will see low value pua pu$$y beggers going around approach women over and over again with no result. There was even vids of a virgin deformed guy cold approaching. Guess what women do not give him the time of day. Hes treated like trash. If women like you enough they will approach you. Do you see the likes of justin bieber and drake cold approach??? nah they get approached and the women would do anything to get their sperm. This is basic common sense RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bits - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 10:40 AM)posh Wrote: Low value men do cold approach. Go to oxford street London and you will see low value pua pu$$y beggers going around approach women over and over again with no result. There was even vids of a virgin deformed guy cold approaching. Guess what women do not give him the time of day. Hes treated like trash. Yes actually, I was at liv in Miami and saw Bieber approach of group of girls. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - posh - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 10:06 AM)bits Wrote:(11-06-2016, 09:49 AM)posh Wrote: Legit post I paid for dmsi which said it would make women approach and try to fuk me. with a high value guy a woman knows she has to be the one that approaches or she won't get her man. Doing a stare isn't going to make justin bieber come over to her and approach her, especially a post prime woman like anna lol. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 11-06-2016 (11-06-2016, 10:40 AM)posh Wrote: Low value men do cold approach. Go to oxford street London and you will see low value pua pu$$y beggers going around approach women over and over again with no result. There was even vids of a virgin deformed guy cold approaching. Guess what women do not give him the time of day. Hes treated like trash. What's common sense is this: You're being completely illogical here by relying on absolute outliers to make your arguments. You went from one end of the spectrum (a virgin deformed guy) to freaking Justin Bieber and Drake, skipping over the entire continuum of below average to average to above average men in the process. |