![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-15-2015 If you're referring to overcoming approach anxiety for men, I'm not remembering that at the moment... I was working on EHPRA 2.0. But OF 5G is going to have a script designed for maximum versatility, so all I'll need to do is go through it and find/replace "fear" with "guilt, shame and fear" and it will work for upgrading both equally well, all in one fell swoop. Not often I get such a gift, but there it is. And if this new technology works like I think it will, hehehe, you're in for a serious treat. This is actually another 6G technology that I'm back porting. One of the very few I can back port. (If it ends up working.) RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 12-15-2015 Yeah at some point you were about to make OAA in 5G but it was a long time ago. It was when Geodude was doing OAA in 4G before he did SM3. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 12-16-2015 (12-15-2015, 11:39 PM)Shannon Wrote: If you're referring to overcoming approach anxiety for men, I'm not remembering that at the moment... I was working on EHPRA 2.0. But OF 5G is going to have a script designed for maximum versatility, so all I'll need to do is go through it and find/replace "fear" with "guilt, shame and fear" and it will work for upgrading both equally well, all in one fell swoop. Not often I get such a gift, but there it is. This new tech, are you saying is in OF 5G? If so, what is it called/what does it do? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-16-2015 (12-16-2015, 01:50 AM)dissonance Wrote:(12-15-2015, 11:39 PM)Shannon Wrote: If you're referring to overcoming approach anxiety for men, I'm not remembering that at the moment... I was working on EHPRA 2.0. But OF 5G is going to have a script designed for maximum versatility, so all I'll need to do is go through it and find/replace "fear" with "guilt, shame and fear" and it will work for upgrading both equally well, all in one fell swoop. Not often I get such a gift, but there it is. It's being fitted. I'm about 75% sure I'll end up being able to add it. What is it? C.A.S.T.: Continuous Automatic Self Training. Done at a subconscious, and possibly conscious level, to achieve the goal faster, better and more permanently. I know it works for 6G format; and I'm pretty sure it will work in 5G as well. Let's hope. So far so good. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Catman - 12-16-2015 (12-16-2015, 02:57 AM)Shannon Wrote: It's being fitted. I'm about 75% sure I'll end up being able to add it. What is it? Speaking of 6G, Shannon. I remember you saying a preliminary WPS 6G figure is 416.67. Also, that it may only be able to be used 3 hours a day. I ran some numbers, and since I use 5G for a massive amount of hours per day, I wanted to see the difference in WPS between the two, but I was surprised with what I discovered. Now, let's say I listen for 19 hours a day, which is slightly conservative... Okay, numbers time: 6G: 1,500,012 words per hour = 4,500,036 words per day. 5G: 288,000 words per hour = 5,472,000 words per day. See that? So oddly, if the 6G numbers hold, then I'd be getting LESS words per day. Surprising, but I realise I'm an outlier as most don't listen anywhere near the hours I do. Also, I remember you have improved 6G and you've said the 416.67 WPS figure is outdated now. Also, 6G techs will likely do a lot of uniquely powerful things in 6G format, but still, the WPS figure surprises me. My long-winded question is, can you provide a new, accurate WPS figure so I can calm my fears? Haha! Even a new hour estimate if that has changed at all, I don't know how much testing has been done by yourself or by models, just spitballing. Thank you in advance, Shannon. Can't wait for OF 5G, man! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 12-16-2015 Hey there Shannon! I'm SUPER excited for OF 5G. I hope it'll be out by the end of this year, I'm so eager to start it in 2016. I want to get your thoughts on my situation though so I can make the best choice. I've been running AoS with BIATBWS for almost 2 months and it doesn't seem to be working. But I have experienced a few days of pretty much no social anxiety, but most days have much MORE social anxiety than before I started the program. I also have less motivation and go through depression when I don't have a hot girl to have sex with when I really want to. This didn't happen that much before the program either. Would OF 5G be the right choice for me? I plan to do OF for at least 6 months and then AM6 (which has OGSF, EPRHA, and other goodies!). I ran EPRHA for 6 months before AoS and BIATBWS and it definitely helped as I thought all the depression and most anxiety was gone. Also will OGSF 5G be different from the OGSF in AM6? And will EPRHA 2.0 be added to AM6? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 12-16-2015 (12-16-2015, 11:21 AM)yeah! Wrote: Funnily I'm concerned about running OGSF as a single as the two six stages I want both have it (do all 6 stegers have it I know BE, AF, AM, BASE and SM I think only WM doesnt?) and I'm afraid that I will create too much snowdrift in that direction, though if it had to be in any direction that would be a good one I guess..... Probably would clear out ancestral memories, here's what I mean. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_memory_(psychology) RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 12-16-2015 (12-16-2015, 06:05 AM)CatMan Wrote:(12-16-2015, 02:57 AM)Shannon Wrote: It's being fitted. I'm about 75% sure I'll end up being able to add it. What is it? I remember Shannon saying that 6G loads in your mind and still executes after you stopped listening. So i don't think you have to worry. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-16-2015 (12-16-2015, 06:05 AM)CatMan Wrote:(12-16-2015, 02:57 AM)Shannon Wrote: It's being fitted. I'm about 75% sure I'll end up being able to add it. What is it? With 6G, words per second is not the primary indicator of power. The primary power indicator is a number of things of much more challenging explanation. However, I just recompressed the script for the prototype, which was becoming challenging to build again. It is now around 82,500 words compressed. After calculating the compression ratio, I have concluded that you just would not believe me if I told you the WPS of the current compression rate. I apparently have managed to successfully achieve an almost limitless compression ratio, and I did not realize that because last time I calculated it I left out one of the variables. The question isn't "What is the words per minute?". The question is, "How many words per minute do I want you to get?" And the answer is, "How many words per minute works best?" There is a technology in 6G scripting that allows for me to compress the script in a way that allows for this nearly infinite compression while the brain and subconscious still can comprehend and execute it. It's like impulse drive (5G) vs. warp (6G). There's no comparison. The only real limit is, "What works best?" and so far I haven't optimized for that, but for me to say that you're effectively getting the amount of words per second that the current 6G script generates would not be realistically something I could expect you to believe if I told you. How did I forget this when I calculated it last? Easy. When every new technology added is blowing you away, and there are a seemingly endless number of them coming one after the other, it's easy to forget about #13 when you're working on #76. Giving you the number of WPS for the 6G prototype won't give you the number that matters because the prototype isn't a program you're using. Other programs will have different values. But when I say that a few hours a day with 6G beats 21 hours a day with 5G, it's because of this incredible compression ratio. You could listen to a 5G program like AM6 24/7 and I can handily beat the words per second without effort in a few hours a day if I so choose, and literally to whatever degree I choose, because of the way 6G works and the compression methodologies in use. Fear not my friend. It's not pie in the sky. But don't take anything as set in stone yet, because I'm not done developing it, and I'm not done determining optimal usage configuration. It may be less than three hours a day and it may be more. I'm hoping to make it 1 hour a day, with options for "as much as you want". What actually comes out in the end, however, is going to be what actually works best, not what I want. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-16-2015 (12-16-2015, 10:32 AM)yeah! Wrote: So just out of curiosity can you still transfer directly from OF 1.1 to OF5G or is it too different now to do that? You're fine doing that. In fact it should be easier. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-16-2015 (12-16-2015, 11:03 AM)maxx55 Wrote: Hey there Shannon! I'm SUPER excited for OF 5G. I hope it'll be out by the end of this year, I'm so eager to start it in 2016. AOS and BIABWS should prizobably be run individually. That might be why it seems to not be working. OF 5G is a good choice regardless. In my opinion, the best options for what you're attempting to accomplish would be, in order: 1. EHPRA 2.0 2. OGSF 5G 3. OF 5G. And yes, OGSF 5G will be different than the one in AM6. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-16-2015 (12-16-2015, 11:21 AM)yeah! Wrote: Funnily I'm concerned about running OGSF as a single as the two six stages I want both have it (do all 6 stegers have it I know BE, AF, AM, BASE and SM I think only WM doesnt?) and I'm afraid that I will create too much snowdrift in that direction, though if it had to be in any direction that would be a good one I guess..... It never stops going in. The subconscious records everything you sense from all your senses, 24/7/365. Data storage for consciousness does not work like for computers. We are limited with computers, currently, to recording data using physical manipulations such as magnetic fields and the materials they are generated by, or transistors, memristors, etc. But this is not how the mind stores information. The brain itself is not where information is actually stored; it's just the physical interface point for the mind, which is not itself physical. As such, the brain has neural pathways that enable specific activities within the physical body, and those can be developed, adjusted, damaged, etc. But the actual data is stored in a way that takes up no physical space, and there is an unlimited amount of "storage capacity" for it. That is why, for instance, as long as one takes care of their brain, they can continue to learn regardless of how long they live; and, further, all of their memories are being recorded regardless of how well they take care of their brain. Those experiences may become distorted because the brain cannot effectively process and do it's job as it deteriorates, but all awareness is still recorded faithfully. Just not physically. Now that said, current scientific paradigms are going to mean that mainstream science will probably resist discovering and accepting the full truth of that for quite some time because mainstream science currently insists on certain factors while denying others, some of which are necessary to consider for "discovering" such things. Eventually it will become known and understood regardless. How long that will take, I have no idea. So over time, if you keep plugging away at inputting a specific piece of data, what happens? Well, according to my snowdrift theory, depending on what specifically that data is it will either become a primary program or it will become a primary reference point for the primary program. Quote:Using OGSF as an example, say I did 6months OGSF 5G single stage, then AM6 3 times then BASE 4 times, but during the second run of BASE OGSF was became permanent and dominant, what happens after that? You are a supremely complex and dynamic system. There are too many variables in play for me to be able to answer that question. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 12-16-2015 This afternoon, I was comparing the effects of "with CAST" and "without CAST" for OF 5G and I was surprised to see that "without CAST" seems to work much better in the long run. I was confused by this, and upon further analysis, I realized why. CAST causes focus on the goal in a way that is incompatible with dealing with fear specifically. It would, in effect, cause the same limitations that the current OF program has by forcing the user to deal with fear too aggressively and thus trigger it. So, it's looking like this technology is not compatible with the specific goal of this program, and probably will not be included if further evidence to this end comes up. The goal is easier and smoother success without triggering fear. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 12-16-2015 (12-16-2015, 07:13 PM)Shannon Wrote:(12-16-2015, 11:03 AM)maxx55 Wrote: Hey there Shannon! I'm SUPER excited for OF 5G. I hope it'll be out by the end of this year, I'm so eager to start it in 2016. Thanks Shannon. Just so I am sure I understand. It would be best for me to run the 3 programs you mentioned even though I plan on doing AM6 (3x back to back) before I even start my first AM run? My goal is to use Sex Magnet successfully and feel super solid in myself emotionally. I thought running AM repeatedly would be the fastest way to achieve this. But if using those 3 programs first will make the difference between achieving my goal or not, then I'll do it. |