+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 01-24-2019
(01-23-2019, 08:37 PM)josh84 Wrote: Hi Shannon, listened to dmsi 3.3.1 ultrasonic last night through vlc media player and speakers.
Im not expecting anything to happen after one night of listening, i was in situations today with many attractive women including one i have wanted to get some interest from with the aim of dmsi of them chasing us but cant expect anything to happen after one day.
Why not? Several others have noticed effects and differences in just one day. That sounds like an artificially limiting belief based on a logical fallacy called "insisting on the past". It works like this: "It happened in the past, [and it happened X number of times!] so it must happen in the future."
I wonder how much we prevent our own success by believing things like that and excluding other possibilities on a conscious level.
Quote:With this version we will only see end results when something in us actually changes we wont know its doing anything until we see the final results because the frm is meant to be very smooth working on us?
What I design these programs and modules to do, you guys somehow find ways to de-rail almost every time. For example, sleep disturbances should be impossible on this FRM 4.4, yet we have already had someone report what, three in one night?
It is designed to work such that you just start executing, almost immediately. How it will play out is going to be seen by how it plays out. I don't know until then.
Quote:So is there anyway to know if anything is happening or basically just have to wait and see how we change in ourselves and people around us react?
Thanks.
If I knew the answers to these questions, would I need this program to be experimental, and observe how it plays out in live usage? I can't know this yet.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Choice - 01-24-2019
(01-24-2019, 07:45 AM)Shannon Wrote: What I design these programs and modules to do, you guys somehow find ways to de-rail almost every time. For example, sleep disturbances should be impossible on this FRM 4.4, yet we have already had someone report what, three in one night?
This happened to me as well, I fell asleep and suddenly woke up in fear, although this happened only one time. On 3.3 this never happened even once.
What's interesting with this new version (3.3.1) is I have double the amount of dreams I had on 3.3 - on both days of listening so far.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Greenduck - 01-24-2019
(01-24-2019, 08:31 AM)Choice Wrote:(01-24-2019, 07:45 AM)Shannon Wrote: What I design these programs and modules to do, you guys somehow find ways to de-rail almost every time. For example, sleep disturbances should be impossible on this FRM 4.4, yet we have already had someone report what, three in one night?
This happened to me as well, I fell asleep and suddenly woke up in fear, although this happened only one time. On 3.3 this never happened even once.
What's interesting with this new version (3.3.1) is I have double the amount of dreams I had on 3.3 - on both days of listening so far.
I have had times I woke up in fear during E2 to so I know what you are talking about. But often I feel more cleared in the days after so this is a small price to pay to overcome deep fears. It would only be a problem if my sleep would be seriously interrupted for a longer time.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ncbeareatingman - 01-24-2019
Shannon's words: Why not? Several others have noticed effects and differences in just one day. That sounds like an artificially limiting belief based on a logical fallacy called "insisting on the past". It works like this: "It happened in the past, [and it happened X number of times!] so it must happen in the future."
I wonder how much we prevent our own success by believing things like that and excluding other possibilities on a conscious level.
Response: Maybe a "Big" something to consider when scripting the new Ultra Monetary Success and Ultra Success-Luck-Maximizer 4... shure would be a nice effective program addition to included 'stuff' that removes and prevents such 're-creation' of the past,so that WE ARE FREE to see/be/and do better successfully without dragging the past into it to block what all could Be?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - hsindermann - 01-24-2019
Adding to the 3.3.1D sleep reports here: I woke up from bad dreams twice last night as well. I don't mind though, because both times I fell asleep very quickly again. Also, compared to the previous version, I fell asleep in the evening way quicker (on 3.3 it often took me a whole hour, last night were few minutes). Also I felt very well rested the whole day through today, which speaks of an overall good sleep quality.
So all in all for me this seems like a major improvement over 3.3
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - RiseaKnight - 01-24-2019
When can we expect DMSI C to drop? I stoped D last weekend thinking c was gonna drop this week. Should I just go back to d? thanks!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - hsindermann - 01-24-2019
(01-24-2019, 10:54 AM)RiseaKnight Wrote: When can we expect DMSI C to drop? I stoped D last weekend thinking c was gonna drop this week. Should I just go back to d? thanks!
The product page for DMSI says there will be no C version, only D.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - whome - 01-24-2019
Originally there was going to be a 3.3D (just FRM) then later a 3.3C (H&C + FRM). Then Shannon ran the models and found that C wasn't going to be worth the effectiveness, so then decided to roll 3.3.1 with new FRM. Apparently he kept the "D" designation but that still means just FRM.
I don't have the links handy but last I heard there will never be a C.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 01-24-2019
(01-24-2019, 09:24 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: Shannon's words: Why not? Several others have noticed effects and differences in just one day. That sounds like an artificially limiting belief based on a logical fallacy called "insisting on the past". It works like this: "It happened in the past, [and it happened X number of times!] so it must happen in the future."
I wonder how much we prevent our own success by believing things like that and excluding other possibilities on a conscious level.
Response: Maybe a "Big" something to consider when scripting the new Ultra Monetary Success and Ultra Success-Luck-Maximizer 4... shure would be a nice effective program addition to included 'stuff' that removes and prevents such 're-creation' of the past,so that WE ARE FREE to see/be/and do better successfully without dragging the past into it to block what all could Be?
I have been trying to do that for 5+ years now.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Sphe - 01-24-2019
I was in a bad mood earlier (very irritable); owing to the day's happenings. I started playing my loops for today, and after a single loop, my mood has shifted to a neutral and calm one. I suppose one can't achieve "maximum irresistibility" while peeved, so the program may have steered me away from that state of mind.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - RiseaKnight - 01-24-2019
Ok, so I just downloaded 3.1 D. Am I suppose to take 35 day break after I have been using 3.0D or can I just continue? Thanks
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - RTBoss - 01-24-2019
(01-24-2019, 02:20 PM)RiseaKnight Wrote: Ok, so I just downloaded 3.1 D. Am I suppose to take 35 day break after I have been using 3.0D or can I just continue? Thanks
No need, just start 3.3.1 today.
8 loops.
7 days on, 3 days off.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 01-24-2019
(01-24-2019, 02:20 PM)RiseaKnight Wrote: Ok, so I just downloaded 3.1 D. Am I suppose to take 35 day break after I have been using 3.0D or can I just continue? Thanks
There was no 3.1 D. There was a 3.1-A and 3.1-B. If you have been using v3.0.1, you are WAY behind. There was no 3.0-D either, it was 3.0.1-A and B.
v3.3 saw the introduction of the D option, and there will be no A, B or C for v3.3 or v3.3.1.
If you really have been using 3.0.1, you're in for one hell of a jump. But yes, as RTB said... just start using the program.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - RiseaKnight - 01-24-2019
(01-24-2019, 02:56 PM)Shannon Wrote:(01-24-2019, 02:20 PM)RiseaKnight Wrote: Ok, so I just downloaded 3.1 D. Am I suppose to take 35 day break after I have been using 3.0D or can I just continue? Thanks
There was no 3.1 D. There was a 3.1-A and 3.1-B. If you have been using v3.0.1, you are WAY behind. There was no 3.0-D either, it was 3.0.1-A and B.
v3.3 saw the introduction of the D option, and there will be no A, B or C for v3.3 or v3.3.1.
If you really have been using 3.0.1, you're in for one hell of a jump. But yes, as RTB said... just start using the program.
I mean I have been using 3.3.0 D with 5 loops that I downloaded last month. Is 3.3.1 the same thing just more loops?