(12-03-2015, 12:15 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-03-2015, 10:38 AM)AriGold Wrote: Hm. I thought we were in Shannon's Journal Discussion. Now it looks like the "everyone ask their questions in this thread, so nobody else will ever find the answer again" thread.

Back to topic:
Shannon, since you will put state shifting into OF, do you think other programs could benefit from it to? Like creative programs "writers subliminal" or "famous musician" to get into a creative state? I mean, it might open a lot of doors, I cannot think of many other purposes, but these guys here are frickin creative and helpful, so you don't have to come up with all the ideas, you just have to get them focused upon the goal.
Also, does OF just get rid of fear or every time replace it with something positive?

I believe that state shifting is almost universally useful. I'm not necessarily sure how extensively I am going to be using it in 5G, but it will be a standard in 6G format.

OF is designed to cause you to outgrow the root cause of fear, and become knowledgeable and aware of the thing you feared such that fear is no longer possible. Fear naturally evaporates as we become more and more familiar with, aware of and educated on a thing. It is also designed to replace fear with positives.

(12-03-2015, 12:15 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-03-2015, 10:38 AM)AriGold Wrote: Hm. I thought we were in Shannon's Journal Discussion. Now it looks like the "everyone ask their questions in this thread, so nobody else will ever find the answer again" thread.

Back to topic:
Shannon, since you will put state shifting into OF, do you think other programs could benefit from it to? Like creative programs "writers subliminal" or "famous musician" to get into a creative state? I mean, it might open a lot of doors, I cannot think of many other purposes, but these guys here are frickin creative and helpful, so you don't have to come up with all the ideas, you just have to get them focused upon the goal.
Also, does OF just get rid of fear or every time replace it with something positive?

I believe that state shifting is almost universally useful. I'm not necessarily sure how extensively I am going to be using it in 5G, but it will be a standard in 6G format.

OF is designed to cause you to outgrow the root cause of fear, and become knowledgeable and aware of the thing you feared such that fear is no longer possible. Fear naturally evaporates as we become more and more familiar with, aware of and educated on a thing. It is also designed to replace fear with positives.

(12-03-2015, 04:56 PM)dissonance Wrote:

(12-03-2015, 12:15 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-03-2015, 10:38 AM)AriGold Wrote: Hm. I thought we were in Shannon's Journal Discussion. Now it looks like the "everyone ask their questions in this thread, so nobody else will ever find the answer again" thread.

Back to topic:
Shannon, since you will put state shifting into OF, do you think other programs could benefit from it to? Like creative programs "writers subliminal" or "famous musician" to get into a creative state? I mean, it might open a lot of doors, I cannot think of many other purposes, but these guys here are frickin creative and helpful, so you don't have to come up with all the ideas, you just have to get them focused upon the goal.
Also, does OF just get rid of fear or every time replace it with something positive?

I believe that state shifting is almost universally useful. I'm not necessarily sure how extensively I am going to be using it in 5G, but it will be a standard in 6G format.

OF is designed to cause you to outgrow the root cause of fear, and become knowledgeable and aware of the thing you feared such that fear is no longer possible. Fear naturally evaporates as we become more and more familiar with, aware of and educated on a thing. It is also designed to replace fear with positives.

Is OF 5G going to have any aggressive and straight-forward fear destruction? If not, what do you think about having both types of methods in it? Geodude had some great results from the aggressive types in 4G. Would combining the two methods (the new 5G method you describe, and the 4G aggression), be even more powerful? Plus, the aggressive type, which normally had caused lots of turbulence, resistance and whatnot in 4G, would be a lot less turbulent with Naturalizer and OE, right?

(12-03-2015, 04:56 PM)dissonance Wrote:

(12-03-2015, 12:15 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-03-2015, 10:38 AM)AriGold Wrote: Hm. I thought we were in Shannon's Journal Discussion. Now it looks like the "everyone ask their questions in this thread, so nobody else will ever find the answer again" thread.

Back to topic:
Shannon, since you will put state shifting into OF, do you think other programs could benefit from it to? Like creative programs "writers subliminal" or "famous musician" to get into a creative state? I mean, it might open a lot of doors, I cannot think of many other purposes, but these guys here are frickin creative and helpful, so you don't have to come up with all the ideas, you just have to get them focused upon the goal.
Also, does OF just get rid of fear or every time replace it with something positive?

I believe that state shifting is almost universally useful. I'm not necessarily sure how extensively I am going to be using it in 5G, but it will be a standard in 6G format.

OF is designed to cause you to outgrow the root cause of fear, and become knowledgeable and aware of the thing you feared such that fear is no longer possible. Fear naturally evaporates as we become more and more familiar with, aware of and educated on a thing. It is also designed to replace fear with positives.

Is OF 5G going to have any aggressive and straight-forward fear destruction? If not, what do you think about having both types of methods in it? Geodude had some great results from the aggressive types in 4G. Would combining the two methods (the new 5G method you describe, and the 4G aggression), be even more powerful? Plus, the aggressive type, which normally had caused lots of turbulence, resistance and whatnot in 4G, would be a lot less turbulent with Naturalizer and OE, right?

(12-03-2015, 12:13 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-03-2015, 08:18 AM)Mr. Anderson Wrote: Here is a question. An iPhone has only one speaker which means it's mono. But I noticed the iPhone mixes both channels of a stereo file into that one speaker. I also tested it with a self created short stereo file. I could definitely hear both channels. So would it be sufficient to use an iPhone in this case?

Mixing a left and right channel into a single channel is mono. One channel results. Left and right no longer exist. When both channels have very similar data it would be sufficient. But in this case, I use each channel as an exclusive transport for information, such that when the brain is presented with both channels, it is forced to use both hemispheres to make sense of the information. That results in a much more powerful subliminal, at the expense of having to use two channels. As a safety and backup, the information is eventually repeated in both channels such that even with a mono speaker it will work, but that is why it only gives about 45% of the full possible effect when you use mono instead of stereo.

(12-03-2015, 11:42 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-03-2015, 04:56 PM)dissonance Wrote:

(12-03-2015, 12:15 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(12-03-2015, 10:38 AM)AriGold Wrote: Hm. I thought we were in Shannon's Journal Discussion. Now it looks like the "everyone ask their questions in this thread, so nobody else will ever find the answer again" thread.

Back to topic:
Shannon, since you will put state shifting into OF, do you think other programs could benefit from it to? Like creative programs "writers subliminal" or "famous musician" to get into a creative state? I mean, it might open a lot of doors, I cannot think of many other purposes, but these guys here are frickin creative and helpful, so you don't have to come up with all the ideas, you just have to get them focused upon the goal.
Also, does OF just get rid of fear or every time replace it with something positive?

I believe that state shifting is almost universally useful. I'm not necessarily sure how extensively I am going to be using it in 5G, but it will be a standard in 6G format.

OF is designed to cause you to outgrow the root cause of fear, and become knowledgeable and aware of the thing you feared such that fear is no longer possible. Fear naturally evaporates as we become more and more familiar with, aware of and educated on a thing. It is also designed to replace fear with positives.

Is OF 5G going to have any aggressive and straight-forward fear destruction? If not, what do you think about having both types of methods in it? Geodude had some great results from the aggressive types in 4G. Would combining the two methods (the new 5G method you describe, and the 4G aggression), be even more powerful? Plus, the aggressive type, which normally had caused lots of turbulence, resistance and whatnot in 4G, would be a lot less turbulent with Naturalizer and OE, right?

If I thought the aggressive approach was better, or as good, it would be in there. What I have found, however, is that for some personality types and some levels and types of fear, direct and aggressive is too much to handle, and produces a reverse result or causes the person to have too much fear to use the program.

Direct is certainly in there. But aggressive is not all it's cracked up to be overall, and so I'll be taking a better path this time.

The naturalizer can only do so much in 5G format. Consider that we still have guys who can't finish AM6 because it's too much for them, even with a very advanced naturalizer. Fear is a tough cookie. We must approach it in the best way possible, and while I will be using the naturalizer, I will also be using the "yin" approach. Water, after all, takes down even the mightiest of mountains. Fortunately, this program won't require that long to do so.

Remember that a gentler approach does not mean a less powerful one. That's very typical "guy thinking". In many cases, softer, gentler, more subtle and so forth is better. Just see how much a woman likes it if you get aggressive with her girl parts, and you'll see what I mean. But most women love Love LOVE having their girl parts touched with almost imperceptible gentleness. I have had a number of girlfriends, for example, who were a dead fish in response to aggressive oral sex, but when I tried being super subtle, super gentle, etc. they came alive and went crazy.

Just like sometimes, a very low volume is better for subs, depending on the format, subject and goal.

More aggressive is not always better. In this case, I think you'll see what I mean very clearly. Overcoming fear should not be a fear-filled journey.

(12-04-2015, 11:30 AM)yeah! Wrote: hehe 45% of 4 or 5G is still better than the average sub.........does it still count as time or should it be halved, ie you need 17 hours (to allow for the 5%) a day instead of 8 with mono speaker?

(12-03-2015, 12:13 PM)Shannon Wrote: Mixing a left and right channel into a single channel is mono. One channel results. Left and right no longer exist. When both channels have very similar data it would be sufficient. But in this case, I use each channel as an exclusive transport for information, such that when the brain is presented with both channels, it is forced to use both hemispheres to make sense of the information. That results in a much more powerful subliminal, at the expense of having to use two channels. As a safety and backup, the information is eventually repeated in both channels such that even with a mono speaker it will work, but that is why it only gives about 45% of the full possible effect when you use mono instead of stereo.

(12-05-2015, 02:31 AM)swisston Wrote:

(12-03-2015, 12:13 PM)Shannon Wrote: Mixing a left and right channel into a single channel is mono. One channel results. Left and right no longer exist. When both channels have very similar data it would be sufficient. But in this case, I use each channel as an exclusive transport for information, such that when the brain is presented with both channels, it is forced to use both hemispheres to make sense of the information. That results in a much more powerful subliminal, at the expense of having to use two channels. As a safety and backup, the information is eventually repeated in both channels such that even with a mono speaker it will work, but that is why it only gives about 45% of the full possible effect when you use mono instead of stereo.

If stereo speakers are placed next to each other, rather than on opposite sides of the room/head, would that make any difference?

(12-03-2015, 12:15 PM)Shannon Wrote: If I thought the aggressive approach was better, or as good, it would be in there. What I have found, however, is that for some personality types and some levels and types of fear, direct and aggressive is too much to handle, and produces a reverse result or causes the person to have too much fear to use the program.

Direct is certainly in there. But aggressive is not all it's cracked up to be overall, and so I'll be taking a better path this time.