Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Zane - 03-13-2018

This is so sad. Sad
My condolences


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Kol - 03-13-2018

My condolences aswell Eternity.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ichigo - 03-14-2018

Sorry to hear that Eternity.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - AstonMartin - 03-14-2018

Shannon, what can you estimate about the effectiveness of H&C in 3.2A then compared to 3.1A?
Maybe in percentage.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Omni3 - 03-14-2018

(03-13-2018, 03:10 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-12-2018, 03:25 PM)kingpill Wrote: Shannon, how would DMSI primed at relationships differ from DMSI now? Thanks

It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.

+1 for thisThumbsup


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Duke.Togo - 03-14-2018

E, I'm so sorry for your loss. I know how painful it is to lose someone you loved or shared a bond with. My thoughts are with you Brother...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - firsthelix - 03-14-2018

(03-13-2018, 09:38 PM)eternity Wrote: Its really hard for me to muster up the strength to post this but the girl i was seeing for the past 6 months passed away yesterday. Life is too short. She was 24. If there is something i take away from this experience to share with yall.. its that life is too short to sit on the sidelines and let life pass you by. Every moment is precious.

My condolences and all the strength you need right now! I am so sorry for your loss...

Take good care of yourself!


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Omni3 - 03-14-2018

(03-13-2018, 09:38 PM)eternity Wrote: Its really hard for me to muster up the strength to post this but the girl i was seeing for the past 6 months passed away yesterday. Life is too short. She was 24. If there is something i take away from this experience to share with yall.. its that life is too short to sit on the sidelines and let life pass you by. Every moment is precious.

I'm sorry for your loss.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Ymiraku - 03-14-2018

(03-13-2018, 09:38 PM)eternity Wrote: Its really hard for me to muster up the strength to post this but the girl i was seeing for the past 6 months passed away yesterday. Life is too short. She was 24. If there is something i take away from this experience to share with yall.. its that life is too short to sit on the sidelines and let life pass you by. Every moment is precious.

That is so sad and shitty, i'm so very sorry for your loss Sad

24 years old and no longer with us and here we are agonizing over our 'problems'.

I hope you find the strength to move on and find that special place in your heart for her that no one can touch Smile


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 03-14-2018

(03-13-2018, 01:18 PM)dissonance Wrote:
(03-13-2018, 12:48 PM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-13-2018, 12:15 PM)dissonance Wrote:
(03-13-2018, 10:33 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-13-2018, 10:21 AM)dissonance Wrote: I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then Big Grin

It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.

Ok that's understandable. If I were to run it during a committed relationship, which aspects of it would help the relationship, if I consciously kept myself from seducing and flirting with other girls? I'm guessing the sexual performance modules would most likely... but what else?

Define "it".

DMSI 3.2b, and maybe 3.2a if i feel i need it

Well the celebrity effect might, depending on how secure your girl is. The sexual performance enhancer would. The sniper would, to whatever degree you snipe her, and the baseline attractiveness aura would, as long as she did not suddenly feel too "outshined". The Natural Seduction module would also, to whatever degree you seduced her instead of someone else.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 03-14-2018

(03-13-2018, 02:08 PM)Jake2015 Wrote:
(03-13-2018, 10:32 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-13-2018, 09:02 AM)kingpill Wrote: I just realized how powerful telling yourself conciously to execute the script can be. Simply replacing every thought with "execute the script" has given me significantly more iois

Yes, involving the conscious mind and it's will is a powerful ally in creating change. That is in fact what I believe makes hypnosis and NLP so powerful and obvious when they are done successfully. They both involve the conscious mind, even at the deepest levels of state.

I am attempting to do it in reverse, which is challenging.

Well Ive said it 3times before starting to play the loop for today so lets hope it works.

However isnt the very act of purchasing and playing daily the conscious act we need to prove to the subconscious we mean it to execute?

Stating it aloud seems more like were using affirmations which then requires more effort and thus not what we wanted hence why we use subliminal programming.

Your subconscious can and often does disagree with your conscious. Left without communication between them, they will do different things much of the time, and when they directly disagree, it will require direct and correct communication to get them to agree. I'm working on making this automatic, but it's not necessarily the easiest thing to do directly and exclusively from the subconscious. You're asking the subconscious to get the conscious to get the subconscious to agree with the conscious, when it may not...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 03-14-2018

(03-13-2018, 03:20 PM)Benjamin Wrote:
Quote:It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.

I'm not sure about this in the normal DMSI. Because then it has the potential to take you more towards 'monogomy' especially since that is the dominant programming in society and we are mostly programmed towards that in our upbringing. One thing I want DMSI to do (I may use it again eventually) is to clear out that baggage, not buy into it.

Quote:It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.

Ok I hasn't read this far when I replied. So it'll be a seperate program, cool.

Yes, one edition for couples and one edition for non-committed people.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 03-14-2018

(03-13-2018, 05:06 PM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: Shannon, I'm thinking of staying on track B regardless. You said B is like marching through with brute force. Does that mean it would reach the goals faster?

I feel like now, I'm half executing. I haven't edged not even once since I started B (18 days ago). I've been on semen retention for 116 days now, but for the majority of my duration, I had this bad edging habit. But yeah, all that is killed, and no more desire to do so. I uninstalled instagram during the TID days and now have no urges to look at female pics (nude or non-nude). I've been going out like 4 times a week now. Getting at least 20 looks a day, way more than I ever did in the past, and a lot of these girls are solid 10s who would never notice me before. Also girls on dates keep bringing up to hang out again, although no sex yet. But I feel like I might be close and the dam could burst at any moment.

It may reach the goal faster, but that depends on how much and how effectively you resist it. Use that sexual energy to achieve the goals of the program. That's the point of having no masturbation...


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 03-14-2018

(03-13-2018, 05:38 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote:
(03-13-2018, 03:10 AM)Shannon Wrote:
(03-12-2018, 03:28 PM)Shadow2200 Wrote: Shannon, Is goal is still for the those affected by your aura to initiate things with you?

Yes.

Affected do 100% of the work to make it happen?

Yes.