Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-09-2016 (10-09-2016, 12:58 AM)Barba Wrote: Shannon, what are you working on at the moment (besides DMSI) and if/when next verions of AM, SM, WM can be expected? I am working on overcoming the oddly high level of exhaustion I feel all the time lately... trying to work on 6G prototype, DMSI, MIR2... not getting very far very fast. I wake up feeling like I need to go to sleep lately. I think this may be the aftermath of the chickenpox, but I don't know why that would be. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-09-2016 (10-09-2016, 01:24 AM)ffaux Wrote: Does anything in AM deal directly with giving myself unconditional approval and letting go of disapproval of myself and others? If memory serves, it deals directly with giving self unconditional approval and letting go of self disapproval, but does nothing about disapproval of others. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-09-2016 (10-09-2016, 07:07 AM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: When you say you're not going to add additional energy sources do you mean you're not going to seek out any additional energy sources that we haven't previously tried? Or that re-enabling the energy sources that were in versions 2.2 and 2.3 are difficult? I mean I am going to leave the script alone except to disable the clearing aspects. It's not a matter of re-enabling old sources, it's a matter of re-working the entire script to include and handle them. Energy sourcing is a very deeply rooted and complex part of the script. Each such change requires a LOT of modeling and script work. So between that and the information loss by changing it... I am not going to change it in 2.4/2.5 RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Bookstacks DC737 - 10-09-2016 (10-09-2016, 11:14 AM)Shannon Wrote:(10-09-2016, 07:07 AM)Bookstacks DC737 Wrote: When you say you're not going to add additional energy sources do you mean you're not going to seek out any additional energy sources that we haven't previously tried? Or that re-enabling the energy sources that were in versions 2.2 and 2.3 are difficult? Ah okay, gotcha. I was under the assumption that the energy sourcing was just an on/off thing like the clearing. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Duke.Togo - 10-09-2016 Shannon, quick question for you. How much of a difference would 2.3 and a possible 2.5 have if you were to disable the healing scripts from 2.4? Also, if you were to release a 2.5, when would you be considering it for release? I've had the plan to stay on DMSI 2.4 for up to 45 days, so I have 10 days left before I re-evaluate whether I stay on it or go back to 2.3. I was just curious about the differences because if you are going to release a 2.5, and the scripting would be fairly different than 2.3, than I will probably move to that rather than go back to 2.3 after my 45 day run. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 10-09-2016 What's the point of no healing modules, again? Didn't we already do that for the "I told you so" no-healing-module-version V2.3? If people aren't getting the results in V2.4, V2.5 with no healing as the only difference, isn't likely to change that. If V2.5 only has no healing as the sole difference, I don't see the benefit in switching to it. Seems like a waste of time when I may be at least able to get some healing benefits continuing on V2.4 to make the next version work properly. I'm not getting the program goal on V2.4 with healing, so I doubt without healing I'll fare any better. There are like two people here who are anti-healing, one of whom has left the forum it seems, sadly. But, it doesn't seem reasonable or beneficial to shortchange everyone else here just to make a second "I told you so" version. Especially when V2.3 already exists for them to use if they're so dead set on no healing, so tell them to put their money where their mouth is and use it. It's strange to see such resistance to healing modules, especially since they are short circuiting in nature when not needed, so they literally aren't impeding you in any way. This could all just be them trying to resist dealing with whatever they have buried underneath, though. Let's not waste yet another month or more on a *second* "I told you so" version of the program, just to bare out what almost all of us already know. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Duke.Togo - 10-09-2016 (10-09-2016, 11:45 AM)CatMan Wrote: What's the point of no healing modules, again? Didn't we already do that for the "I told you so" no-healing-module-version V2.3? I would like to know from Shannon what the differences in the script would be. I also don't agree with the fact that if people don't have the results with 2.4's current script that a version 2.5 without the clearing modules would be the same.. The way I understood v2.4 to work is that the clearing modules will be in effect until any blockages are removed. After that, the other areas of the script would take into effect. Being that I started with 2.3 and was only 12 days into it before 2.4 was released, I would like to understand the key differences. If there aren't going to be very many key differences between a v2.3 and a v2.5, I agree, it's not worth loading up. If the differences are enough between the two programs, I'd be interested in trying it out. And even if a v2.5 is released, it doesn't mean that everyone has to switch to it. I would like to hear what Shannon has to say, as he knows more about this than all of us here. I'll go with whatever he advises. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 10-09-2016 Why do we even need V2.5 ? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 10-09-2016 (10-09-2016, 11:57 AM)Duke.Togo Wrote: I would like to know from Shannon what the differences in the script would be. Just take a look to the product description at the product page. There are all changes hid did between 2.3 and 2.4. And the only difference between 2.4 and 2.5 would be the removed healing as he said at the last page. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 10-09-2016 Shannon was the one that resurrected 2.5 talk. He said he's thinking about building it due to the extended time between v2.4 and the 3-series. Could use the observations between healing in v2.4 and no healing in v2.5. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Duke.Togo - 10-09-2016 (10-09-2016, 12:03 PM)Mr. Anderson Wrote:(10-09-2016, 11:57 AM)Duke.Togo Wrote: I would like to know from Shannon what the differences in the script would be. No, I understand that portion, but he also upgraded some of the technologies as well in 2.4 that 2.3 didn't have. My question is the overall changes in the program versions between 2.3 and 2.4, if the clearing modules are removed, how much of an overall difference would that make between a v2.3 and a v2.5. I took on the DMSI test to be part of its "clinical trials". If the changes are significant enough between versions, it would be interesting to see what the differences are. I'm only raising these points because they were brought up yesterday and Shannon himself said he was considering it. I'm merely following up on the conversation. We're not guaranteed that V3 will take us to the promised land either. Maybe closer, but, that's the whole point of developing an experimental technology isn't it? To test and continue to refine. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Weichi - 10-09-2016 (10-09-2016, 11:45 AM)CatMan Wrote: It's strange to see such resistance to healing modules, especially since they are short circuiting in nature when not needed, so they literally aren't impeding you in any way. This could all just be them trying to resist dealing with whatever they have buried underneath, though. Unless those modules don't short circuiting and Shannon want to check that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 10-09-2016 (10-09-2016, 12:15 PM)Duke.Togo Wrote: My question is the overall changes in the program versions between 2.3 and 2.4 From product page: Quote:V2.4 Adjustments/additions: That's the technology and also why I mentioned the product page. EDIT: The surprise is P3 RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 10-09-2016 (10-09-2016, 12:16 PM)Weichi Wrote:(10-09-2016, 11:45 AM)CatMan Wrote: It's strange to see such resistance to healing modules, especially since they are short circuiting in nature when not needed, so they literally aren't impeding you in any way. This could all just be them trying to resist dealing with whatever they have buried underneath, though. Then V2.3 would've been a step forward in results, but it wasn't. So it seems the test was already done and feedback showed they weren't in the way. And the reason V2.2 failed was because of a discovered script error, not the healing modules. They were red herrings. So I just feel this test would be redundant, and am hesitant to go off the healing benefits of V2.4 due to that is all. |