Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-04-2016 P5 is a technology I have been using for a long time in the 6G prototype, which is particularly brilliant, but which is so far back in the development cycle that I didn't even realize it was one of the "P" series of technologies. Technically, it's P1 or maybe P2, but it gets designated P5 because I just realized what it does to the effects of P4 and P3. What does it do? P3 takes WPS to the maximum possible. P4 scales it back to whatever is your optimal WPS at that moment. P5 then makes this value higher and more powerful and effective than P3 or P4, while maintaining the optimal effectiveness that P4 introduced for P3. It's very hard to explain without giving away what is being done to achieve this goal, and I would understand if you either think it makes no sense, or if you don't believe it. When I first had the idea for P5, it excited the hell out of me and made me laugh because it seemed so preposterous that I didn't think it would work... But it does. P4 will be in DMSI 3.0.1. P5? Maybe, depending on whether or not it is disruptive to anything else. P5 will be in MIR2, though. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-04-2016 (10-04-2016, 12:35 PM)Travis Wrote: I'm glad to hear Overcome Approach Anxiety will be adde to DMSI v2.4. I had bought it and used it a couple times before realizing how stupid it was to do both. Some people also need a reminder that the goal of the program is to get them to approach you. OAA will therefore be integrated in DMSI such that it affects both the user and the affected. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Blacksheep - 10-04-2016 I'm so very happy that Overcome Approach Anxiety will be added to v2.4. I bought OAA and used it for two days before realizing how stupid it is to mess with the programming. Frustrating to see obvious Shannon says AM6 and DMSI will produce the same results if you keep your nose to the grindstone (At least in terms of women). Very interesting to me. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-04-2016 (10-04-2016, 12:53 PM)Travis Wrote: I'm so very happy that Overcome Approach Anxiety will be added to v2.4. I bought OAA and used it for two days before realizing how stupid it is to mess with the programming. Frustrating to see obvious I do? They're very different programs, and they have very different goals. The results with women will not be the same. Generally, women will be much less likely to act on their attraction without you initiating, from AM6. They'll be attracted and they'll want you, if you've achieved alpha male. But they'll also expect you to do the footwork most of the time. What the goal of DMSI is, is to take anyone - alpha or not - and make them their best most sexually irresistible self, and then make that so intense that others actually initiate and then have physical sex with you as much as you allow. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Blacksheep - 10-04-2016 (10-04-2016, 01:12 PM)Shannon Wrote: I do? My fault, I thought you said something to this effect. I can't remember where and I can't find it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-04-2016 No sweat. Just don't want misunderstandings, because they spread like wildfire. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Blink - 10-04-2016 (10-04-2016, 12:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: P3 takes WPS to the maximum possible. P4 scales it back to whatever is your optimal WPS at that moment. P5 then makes this value higher and more powerful and effective than P3 or P4, while maintaining the optimal effectiveness that P4 introduced for P3. Yea this didn't make sense to me How can you make an optimal value higher, yet have the end result be more powerful and effective? Wouldn't that mean that it wasn't optimal to begin with? Any example that's more concrete than that? Or would that give away too much? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 10-04-2016 (10-04-2016, 12:53 PM)Travis Wrote: I'm so very happy that Overcome Approach Anxiety will be added to v2.4. Technically, OAA will be in V3.0.1. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-04-2016 (10-04-2016, 01:57 PM)Blink Wrote:(10-04-2016, 12:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: P3 takes WPS to the maximum possible. P4 scales it back to whatever is your optimal WPS at that moment. P5 then makes this value higher and more powerful and effective than P3 or P4, while maintaining the optimal effectiveness that P4 introduced for P3. Two words for you. This is all I can say. Reality bending. Beyond that you'll just have to trust me on this... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 10-04-2016 Oh yeah, reality bending. Wasn't that supposed to be in DMSI since the beginning? I have to admit I haven't noticed it yet. :/ RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-04-2016 (10-04-2016, 02:35 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Oh yeah, reality bending. Wasn't that supposed to be in DMSI since the beginning? I have to admit I haven't noticed it yet. :/ There are various technologies that perform reality bending. They work together to form a greater influence. You haven't noticed it because it's not supposed to be noticed in and of itself. And, you're also new to the game... most guys require a month on 2.4 to start seeing it. Ask Chaos if he's noticed its effects yet RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 10-04-2016 (10-04-2016, 02:38 PM)Shannon Wrote:(10-04-2016, 02:35 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Oh yeah, reality bending. Wasn't that supposed to be in DMSI since the beginning? I have to admit I haven't noticed it yet. :/ B-but... I thought I was getting fast results? jk. I understand. Chaos, you're free to interject here, but am I correct to assume it was the sudden tinder and online dating interest? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-04-2016 (10-04-2016, 02:50 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(10-04-2016, 02:38 PM)Shannon Wrote:(10-04-2016, 02:35 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Oh yeah, reality bending. Wasn't that supposed to be in DMSI since the beginning? I have to admit I haven't noticed it yet. :/ You are getting fast results, and ironically, part of that is because of reality bending. It's like autopilot, though: you won't see it at work until you're looking back at what it has done. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 10-04-2016 (10-04-2016, 02:52 PM)Shannon Wrote:(10-04-2016, 02:50 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(10-04-2016, 02:38 PM)Shannon Wrote:(10-04-2016, 02:35 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Oh yeah, reality bending. Wasn't that supposed to be in DMSI since the beginning? I have to admit I haven't noticed it yet. :/ Fair enough. And good to know. |