![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-03-2016 (10-03-2016, 07:53 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(10-03-2016, 06:34 AM)Shannon Wrote: Children may be more attracted to you, as well as animals, because they sense the love you radiate. In some cases, you may find that people start giving you some sort of special treatment. Then it's probably not love they're responding to. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 10-03-2016 (10-03-2016, 07:53 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(10-03-2016, 06:34 AM)Shannon Wrote: Children may be more attracted to you, as well as animals, because they sense the love you radiate. In some cases, you may find that people start giving you some sort of special treatment. You're always talking about how you get more "positive" response from people using "hate" energy (clearly not love). I doubt you have that perspective toward children and animals...yet, here you admit that children and animals are attracted to you and not adults. Hmmm.... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 10-03-2016 (10-03-2016, 08:04 AM)RTBoss Wrote:(10-03-2016, 07:53 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(10-03-2016, 06:34 AM)Shannon Wrote: Children may be more attracted to you, as well as animals, because they sense the love you radiate. In some cases, you may find that people start giving you some sort of special treatment. Lol, true. I don't know, maybe it's because I assume higher value with kids and animals. Don't know if you read it, but I was at some guy's housing doing sales a few days ago and his dog was all barking at me. But from the time it took to go from the gate to the door (mere seconds) the dog had totally changed, and was standing beside me, facing his owner as if her were my pet. ![]() I also have dogs follow me away from their owner's houses as I leave lol. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Frosted - 10-03-2016 Shannon, if AM gets its status from within and WM gets its status from other people, then where does SM get its status? P.S I'm noticing that I have more errors in my writing the more subs I listen to. (after two days on SM my writing went to complete shit till I switched out) RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - pseudonyman - 10-03-2016 (10-03-2016, 06:30 AM)Shannon Wrote:(10-03-2016, 02:44 AM)pseudonyman Wrote: [quote='Shannon' pid='135121' dateline='1475475563'] I will commence a 3 month run of E2 and then reassess whether I want a more targeted sub. From some journals I've looked through sounds like it may not be all fun but I'm looking forward to it. Thanks for the advice and get well soon. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 10-03-2016 Shannon, some DMSI users like Chaos seem to be getting more obvious results than others. I understand that everyone starts from a different place, but would someone who has run AM or clearing subs before running DMSI ultimately get better results than someone that is using DMSI as their first sub? Like when all "clearing" is done and the program has been fully integrated for months, will the results of the newbie on DMSI be just as good as someone who ran AM, E2, or LTU for an extended time beforehand? Even if they never get the same results, would each of them continually get better results indefinitely the longer they run it? Thanks in advance, it's just something that crossed my mind. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-03-2016 (10-03-2016, 01:26 PM)Frosted Wrote: Shannon, if AM gets its status from within and WM gets its status from other people, then where does SM get its status? WM doesn't get it's status from other people. WM isn't about status so much as it is about socializing freely and flowing to your goals through that. It's still internal status source. So is SM. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-03-2016 (10-03-2016, 03:22 PM)pseudonyman Wrote:(10-03-2016, 06:30 AM)Shannon Wrote:(10-03-2016, 02:44 AM)pseudonyman Wrote: [quote='Shannon' pid='135121' dateline='1475475563'] Thank you. I'm mostly there. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-03-2016 (10-03-2016, 05:16 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Shannon, some DMSI users like Chaos seem to be getting more obvious results than others. I understand that everyone starts from a different place, but would someone who has run AM or clearing subs before running DMSI ultimately get better results than someone that is using DMSI as their first sub? DMSI will achieve the same results eventually whether you are new to subs or have used other subs for various types of clearing in the past. It is designed to achieve it;s goals regardless of anything and everything in it's way - given enough time. The more clearing you have done beforehand, the faster it will show results, but the question is... Are the clearing modules in DMSI faster for clearing or using something else? You'll find that DMSI is it's own best friend in that department. However, it will use whatever foundation you currently have upon which to build; so if you have run AM, for example, your foundation will be stronger than if you have not. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 10-03-2016 (10-03-2016, 05:16 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Shannon, some DMSI users like Chaos seem to be getting more obvious results than others. I understand that everyone starts from a different place, but would someone who has run AM or clearing subs before running DMSI ultimately get better results than someone that is using DMSI as their first sub? I ran AM6 twice, back to back -- over an entire year -- for an insane amount of hours. I was pushing 20 hours sometimes. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - lokko - 10-03-2016 Shannon when will you focus on Business related sub upgrades for 5.5 or 6g? I'm assuming your top priority for 6g is ASC or DMSI? then AM7, then business subs? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 10-04-2016 (10-03-2016, 11:26 PM)lokko Wrote: Shannon when will you focus on Business related sub upgrades for 5.5 or 6g? Not until 6G is finished being developed. Right now, focus is on 6G prototype. MIR2 is second. I'm at a juncture right now where what I am doing for this entire week (one task on the 6G prototype) is either going to be a brilliant breakthrough, or a complete bust and waste of a whole week of my time. I won't be developing major stuff or upgrading it until 6G final is here. The first thing that will be released in full 6G is planned to be ASC. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - bits - 10-04-2016 6g asc is going to be amazing ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Griffin - 10-04-2016 MLS or motivation sub would be something i would love... even in 5.5G procrastination has been THE downfall of my life EPHRA 2.0 didnt fix the issue and DMSI is also not focused on this and ASC didnt work on this but i dont want to downgrade to a 5g sub... |