![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - wolverine_i_am - 09-28-2016 Thanks! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 09-28-2016 Hey Shannon, I hope you get over your cold/flu! Maybe you can test out MIR2 if you finish it soon. When you get a chance to respond, I'd like to hear what you have to say about this: I'm still on E2 and I recently made the realization that when I feel attracted to a girl, I feel weak. Like there's nothing/little I can do to make the feeling go away. I just feel that I'm in a losing position if I'm attracted to her but I don't know she's attracted to me. I know E2 will probably handle this, but what is this caused by (past experiences of failure, fear...)? Thank you. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-28-2016 (09-28-2016, 03:01 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Hey Shannon, I hope you get over your cold/flu! Maybe you can test out MIR2 if you finish it soon. The worst part is, I'm usually not motivated to work on MIR unless I have a cold or flu, but while I do, I can only work veeeeeeeeeeeeerrrrrrrrrrrrrryyyyyyyyyyyyyy slowly. Could be a lot of things. The subconscious, or at least, some parts of it, are very irrational. So no logical analysis can answer all of the question or with certainly. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Lowe - 09-28-2016 Shannon, I have a few questions about the fragrances you are working on, especially the aphrodisiacs. How powerful are they? You mentioned before that there are no pheromones in it but you hope to achieve the effects without it. Would you say you have succeeded? How does it compare to the effect of subliminals (particularly MSI) in attracting people? What is the price range you are thinking of for these fragrances? I'm looking forward to trying it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-29-2016 (09-28-2016, 09:50 PM)Lowe Wrote: Shannon, I have a few questions about the fragrances you are working on, especially the aphrodisiacs. How do I quantify how "powerful" they are? Shall I invent a new unit of measurement? I don't know what your measuring stick looks like, what you would compare it to, or how it would work for you with your skin chemistry, or how well the scent would match your personality, or how much you would use, or what the race(s) you would expose would best respond to, or how long after application you expose them, or if they are attracted to or repelled by certain components, or a number of other things. Black Velvet Mark 4 is considered very sexy by a lot of women, and on some guys it gets a lot of compliments. Mark 8 is very polarizing, and on some guys, it produces immediate sexual wetness and arousal in the female. That doesn't mean she's going to tell you that, or act on it... but back when I had two girlfriends, they could always both tell which one I was wearing immediately because of that response. Will every woman respond that way? I don't know. But for them, it was so attractive that it made them more eager for sex, and more enthusiastic. I know it turns off some women just as well. It also has some benefits socially, but just as frequently polarizes people in the other direction. Celestia is for women, very feminine. Whenever one of my girlfriends would wear it, I would almost always respond with arousal initiate sex with her if it was possible. Made me very touchy-feely and seductive, couldn't stop smelling her. Will it affect all guys that way? I'm sure it won't. Have we had women try it and re-order it because of that effect and the social bonuses it brings? Yes. Aphrodisiac fragrances use the synergistic blending of perfumery components with some level of aphrodisiac properties, blended at the right concentrations and ratios, to maximize those effects. That doesn't mean you'll necessarily get more sex or even get compliments. It all depends on the people involved, the amount used, the distance, time of exposure, circumstances, activity, etc. very much like pheromones. Are these as powerful as pheromones? I don't really know. You'll have to get a sample and decide for yourself. As for the price range, we haven't yet calculated the final cost, and it may differ depending on fragrance, but the "good stuff", which is almost entirely what we are planning to offer, is being aimed at making you happy to pay over $100 US for 50 mLs. We're planning on taking a no holds barred approach to quality of ingredients, and of course that gets expensive, so presume "over $100 US for 50 mLs", but don't assume it will be $100. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - THolt - 09-29-2016 "Just as an experiment, I ran the Beast 9 script through the Language Tool grammar and spelling checker. This is the first time the 6G prototype has ever had a spell check or grammar check run. Spelling: Corrected 2 genuine spelling mistakes, added 27 new words to the dictionary. Grammar: Flawless. Document length: 109,669 words. Not too shabby." 109,669 words? That's like a 350 page book. That's impressive. I can't believe all that will be pumped into our head. Wow RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-29-2016 (09-29-2016, 06:25 AM)THolt Wrote: "Just as an experiment, I ran the Beast 9 script through the Language Tool grammar and spelling checker. This is the first time the 6G prototype has ever had a spell check or grammar check run. And that is after several compressions, with another major one forthcoming. But not all of that will likely be appropriate for every title in 6G, so it's probably going to be less words for most titles. But, the smaller the word count, the better, because the faster the input happens. Beast 8 requires fully 20 minutes to input the whole script just once. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - THolt - 09-29-2016 (09-29-2016, 07:03 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-29-2016, 06:25 AM)THolt Wrote: "Just as an experiment, I ran the Beast 9 script through the Language Tool grammar and spelling checker. This is the first time the 6G prototype has ever had a spell check or grammar check run. Wow. Okay. I thought all of these would have had that word count. That would be hell to make haha RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Frosted - 09-29-2016 Shannon, I'm using sleephones now while I sleep instead of only speakers and I'm seeing way better results. Does this mean since I'm already two months through AM6 that it'll unbalance me or my results wont be as great since the first two months won't be as good as the later 4? Do you think I should just stick with what I was doing before and/or run AM6 again after this run using this better method for listening? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-29-2016 (09-29-2016, 08:14 AM)Frosted Wrote: Shannon, I'm using sleephones now while I sleep instead of only speakers and I'm seeing way better results. Does this mean since I'm already two months through AM6 that it'll unbalance me or my results wont be as great since the first two months won't be as good as the later 4? Do you think I should just stick with what I was doing before and/or run AM6 again after this run using this better method for listening? Generally you should use the best listening device you can get your hands on. Phones are at the bottom of the list, and earphones/earbuds are best. Stick with what you're doing (better is always better) and then at the end, decide if you want to run it again or run refresher stage. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-29-2016 Just remembered something that sets my fragrances apart from others. Mine are designed to smell good on your skin, not from the bottle. Most fragrances are designed the reverse - they want you to impulse buy it based on your initial impression. Black Velvet Mark 4 and especially Mark 8 may take 20 to 45 minutes on skin to achieve the scent they are known and loved for. Not all of my fragrances take that long to achieve their goal scent, but the point is, I'm not interested in your impulse buy. I'm interested in whether or not it actually smells good on you for the longer period of time. So keep that in mind when you try my fragrances, and especially the unusual ones like Mark 8. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Frosted - 09-29-2016 Shannon, AM6 works to make us an "Ascendant Alpha" which I think can compared to the concept of a "sigma male" one who is independent from the group, yet strong. When you're more "alpha" but not the alpha of the group per se how do women react? Do they go for the "ascendant alpha" who is more developed or the guy who may be weaker but has more social status. I read somewhere that traditional alphas get the girl because of their status even if a sigma is stronger and more alpha, what is your take Shannon? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-29-2016 (09-29-2016, 11:43 AM)Frosted Wrote: Shannon, AM6 works to make us an "Ascendant Alpha" which I think can compared to the concept of a "sigma male" one who is independent from the group, yet strong. When you're more "alpha" but not the alpha of the group per se how do women react? Do they go for the "ascendant alpha" who is more developed or the guy who may be weaker but has more social status. I read somewhere that traditional alphas get the girl because of their status even if a sigma is stronger and more alpha, what is your take Shannon? First point. Every man, and every woman, is going to be unique. So even if you had 10 "ascendant alphas" at a table, they might all have entirely different styles and personalities within that designation. That alone de-rails your question, but the same is true for all of the women they encounter. Generally people are clueless. Traditional alphas are more obviously alpha, and ascendant alphas are more alpha. In either case, the woman must be aware of the man's alphaness and such before it makes a difference. That depends on various factors that will be determined by the individuals in play. A poor traditional alpha, for example, might lose out to a rich ascendant alpha simply because the female(s) in question know he's rich. If the tables are reversed, the outcome might also be. Most women are not looking past their own nose when it comes to really valuing any particular man, and why should they, when they have armies of Betas AND PUAs trying to drown her in attention all day every day? So it's not a question that you can answer as if all women respond the same to all men of one type. They don't. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ffaux - 09-29-2016 (09-29-2016, 12:24 PM)Shannon Wrote: Most women are not looking past their own nose when it comes to really valuing any particular man, and why should they, when they have armies of Betas AND PUAs trying to drown her in attention all day every day? So how the hell do you get a woman to value/respect you? |