Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 12-31-2018 (12-30-2018, 04:59 PM)AbundanceCH Wrote: Hi Shannon, No, no such tags were calculated for my programs at that time. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Believe - 12-31-2018 (12-31-2018, 05:44 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote:(12-31-2018, 05:14 AM)Believe Wrote: I have been doing USLM for 2 weeks now. A couple of good things have happened. @Shannon I have purchased the USLM on 15th of December, does that mean you have already updated the FRM on the version i have or not yet? If not yet, do you have in mind when you will be updating the file? (Happy new year in advance) RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 12-31-2018 (12-31-2018, 09:03 AM)maxx55 Wrote: Shannon, I see that you say 3.4 will be final and anything beyond that will have to be paid in addition for. Just a few questions when you get a chance to answer. I don't know if there will be a v4, but if there is, why wouldn't it be? This question makes no sense, since every release of DMSI has been a significant improvement in effectiveness, and v4 > v3.x. If 3.4 doesn't work, yes, 4.0 may very well. But I haven't decided what to do that far out yet. Right now I might wait to build 3.4 in 6G or I might build it in 5.5G and then 4.0 in 6G. I don't know where you get some of your ideas, they don't make sense to me. Quote:2. If that is the case, when someone uses 3.4 and it doesn’t work, then what are their options? Both in achieving the goal the program is designed to achieve and with potential refunds or being able to upgrade to 4.0 You are assuming it won't work, and I haven't even started building it yet. But realistically, is it reasonable for me to build 8 versions of the program that you pay for once and then give you a refund if you choose not to execute it? When the time comes and we see what 3.4 does, I will look at what is what and decide what to do for those who are still not executing. For the time being, it does not seem reasonable to me that you would get to pay once, get 7 versions for free, and then get a refund. Quote:3. This isn’t as important of a question, but comparing how effective you want 6G to be, to the tech in DMSI 3.3, how much of a difference is there currently? 6G is going to be a significant step up from where DMSI 3.3 is, we have a number of things to decipher, build and add before we get there. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 12-31-2018 Just tried DMSI 3.3 (IK you are meant to wait 35 days etc but F**k it, I had to try it). Going out tonight, let's see what happens. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - maxx55 - 12-31-2018 Thanks for the fast response Shannon. I’ll try to clarify what I meant since it wasn’t that clear. No, I was not saying it’s fair to pay for one version of a program and get every version after. I mistakenly assumed that 4.0 wouldn’t “hit more resistant users” than 3.4 because 3.4 is supposed to a definitive final version. I thought anything afterward would just be like extra toppings on top of an already well done pizza, not a whole new altogether better pizza. I don’t mean to cast doubt on your work, I just haven’t yet experienced anything to know it works. I’ve invested a lot of time with the program, I do intend to get the results intended as a return of my investment. Clearly, I have not chosen to refuse executing the program. I hope with enough time that 3.3 pleasantly surprises everyone here. I do think aiming for 3.4 to be 6G is a solid option at the moment just in case. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Darwinn - 12-31-2018 Wishing all you guys a very happy new year - here’s to a wild 2019 and to our potentials being fulfilled. And as always, thanks Shannon - it’s a pleasure being a part of this development journey. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - THolt - 12-31-2018 (12-31-2018, 10:18 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-30-2018, 11:34 AM)THolt Wrote:(12-30-2018, 11:18 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-30-2018, 09:49 AM)THolt Wrote: @Shannon any New Years plan this year? I imagine you are going to take a break of some sort from building LTU. In the new year I am looking forward to using UMS as I have to fears around money and scarcity that need clearing. @Shannon Thanks for considering it. I think it would be a neat program. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 12-31-2018 (12-31-2018, 11:17 AM)maxx55 Wrote: Thanks for the fast response Shannon. I’ll try to clarify what I meant since it wasn’t that clear. If that were the case, wouldn't it make sense to call it 3.5? 4.0, if it is made, will be a major step up from 3.4. Quote:I don’t mean to cast doubt on your work, I just haven’t yet experienced anything to know it works. I’ve invested a lot of time with the program, I do intend to get the results intended as a return of my investment. Clearly, I have not chosen to refuse executing the program. The problem is that at the conscious level you have chosen to execute, and at the subconscious level you have chosen to refuse to execute. The big issue is how do we get the subconscious to cooperate? I have a number of things left to do before we get to 6G, yet. I have a LOT of stuff to mine out of Beast, and I haven't yet gotten Beast to design spec. Even just today, sick as I am and unable to really do anything, I had a realization that should - by itself - make 3.4 work for almost everyone. But there are going to be a lot of changes to 3.3 before it becomes 3.4. And if we do 6G as a base, there will be a lot of changes indeed. The key you need to understand, though, is this: whatever results you are getting from DMSI, that is what your subconscious desires are. If that is nothing, then you are, in spite of my best efforts so far, refusing to execute at a subconscious level. And that's the issue - the conscious and subconscious can disagree 100%, and when they do, the subconscious always wins. Or at least, it always has in the past. We are working to change that. Some of you still represent an enigma apparently. 6G is a ways away because there is so much to do. But first I have to get it finished. Quote:I hope with enough time that 3.3 pleasantly surprises everyone here. I do think aiming for 3.4 to be 6G is a solid option at the moment just in case. I think even where we are with the latest 5.5G tech, 6G is still going to be an entirely different level. There is an unbelievable amount that I have to mine from Beast yet, and like I said, we haven't even finished developing it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - maxx55 - 12-31-2018 Well thanks for clarifying what you meant. It felt pretty discouraging to have been using a program for years and be told “You’re choosing to not let it work”. I do hope that you end up doing everything you could possibly do to have 3.4 be the most reality bending, resistance busting program in your selection. No rush at all. I hope you get better soon Shannon so you enjoy the start of 2019. Hope everyone here has a happy new year. A year of success! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 12-31-2018 (12-31-2018, 07:55 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Well thanks for clarifying what you meant. It felt pretty discouraging to have been using a program for years and be told “You’re choosing to not let it work”. It's pretty discouraging to have been doing this for 26 years now and still not be able to get guys like you to stop stonewalling. At least we aren't out of things to do to fix it yet. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - whome - 12-31-2018 (12-31-2018, 09:36 PM)Shannon Wrote: It's pretty discouraging to have been doing this for 26 years now and still not be able to get guys like you to stop stonewalling. (hugs) I know I can be a tough nut, so I appreciate your efforts to crack me. To success in 2019! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Hatman - 12-31-2018 (12-31-2018, 10:24 PM)whome Wrote:(12-31-2018, 09:36 PM)Shannon Wrote: It's pretty discouraging to have been doing this for 26 years now and still not be able to get guys like you to stop stonewalling. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shawn - 01-01-2019 Happy New Year to everyone! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Chris P. Bacon - 01-01-2019 Shannon, on USLM3 I have had 2 days where I have woken up and had no desire to eat anything all day but I have eaten because I know I need to. This is not normal for me and hasn't happened on any other sub. Could there be a USLM3 related reason for this? To me, it sounds like a stretch but I have no other idea as to why this has happened. Today is a bit of a down day and I think USLM3 is working on some fears, last time I don' remember if it was the same situation. |