![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Sterling - 12-28-2018 (12-28-2018, 12:08 PM)Shannon Wrote:(12-28-2018, 11:03 AM)Sterling Wrote: Hi Shannon. I have some update and concerns about USLM3. Thank you for responding back. I will try those suggestions you have mention above. I really need something to work in my favor instead of what I've been getting lately. Maybe USLM4, LTU, or USM. I do hope one day there will be just one sub that can can help make life flow in all areas of life: lots more money, amazing love, sexual attraction, great sex, ayp, quality friends, accomplish goals, good health, etc... Thanks RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Greenduck - 12-28-2018 (12-27-2018, 03:28 AM)Greenduck Wrote:(12-27-2018, 03:04 AM)Paul1131 Wrote:(12-26-2018, 08:20 PM)Greenduck Wrote: Merry Christmas, My question above probably fell away, so I’ll put post it here again. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Paul1131 - 12-28-2018 (12-28-2018, 11:03 AM)Sterling Wrote: Hi Shannon. I have some update and concerns about USLM3. This might seem like an odd question, but are you SURE you’re actually having bad luck? I had a number of incidents where something happened that at first seemed to be an incident of horrible luck, but something else always happened (some of it quite unlikely) that allowed me to avoid or at least mitigate the damage. I came to the conclusion that the strokes of bad luck were going to happen no matter what for whatever reason, but the opportunities to save the situations were manifestations of USLM. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - robstar - 12-28-2018 (12-17-2018, 01:58 PM)Shannon Wrote:(12-17-2018, 01:50 PM)Tigerismyspirit Wrote:(12-17-2018, 10:45 AM)Tigerismyspirit Wrote:(12-17-2018, 10:16 AM)Shannon Wrote:(12-16-2018, 10:56 PM)robstar Wrote: Hey Shannon. I know you've stated long range sniper is not in 3.3, which is disappointing. However if one was to potentially use conscious visualisation based sexual energy remote seduction/manifestation towards specific women, would the dmsi aura and energy possibly aid that? By this logic, wouldn't any seduction at all which is designed to evoke a feeling of attraction from a woman be removing their free will? Wouldn't dmsi itself which is designed to use your sexual aura to create attraction in women who otherwise would not be attracted be removing their free will? I fail to see how having a specific target would be any different to general targets that are affected by your aura. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - MasterEnki - 12-28-2018 I reckon that anything that forces attraction is an infringement upon free will. If the target has zero natural attraction to you, then it is very likely an infringement of her free will. Whereas, if she already has a natural attraction to you, then things like DMSI, sexy aura, AYP/MYP, general manifestation (with no specific target), etc. would be okay. I’m just guessing here. Shannon, or someone else with a lot of manifestation / ‘law of attraction’ experience, should be able to explain it accurately. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Zane - 12-28-2018 It's a good thing that you can't attract "Dead Women", no matter how much loa/aura or subliminal you use. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - josh84 - 12-28-2018 Hi Shannon, ive done 3 cycles on hybrid with headphones, and havent had any changes apart from maybe libido increase but that can also be caused by other factors too. Should i stay on hybrid or try masked as last time gave masked again could easily fap that i wasnt doing on high volume hybrid but i can also easily do that at -41db hybrid volume too now, only time i didnt was at high volume on hybrid but you mentioned at that high volume the effectiveness of the sub wouldnt be very good? Any suggestions or stay with what im doing a while longer see if anything happens. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DarkTempatation - 12-29-2018 @Shannon I wish Shannon releases LTU 5.5G out for new years day, that'll be a fantastic start to the new year! That's all I'm waiting for ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - AstonMartin - 12-29-2018 (12-29-2018, 04:27 AM)DarkTempatation Wrote: @Shannon I wish Shannon releases LTU 5.5G out for new years day, that'll be a fantastic start to the new year! That's all I'm waiting for If it will not overload my mind like MLS, then I will definitely want to try LTU. Good description, good design goals. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - RTBoss - 12-29-2018 (12-28-2018, 09:28 PM)MasterEnki Wrote: I reckon that anything that forces attraction is an infringement upon free will. If the target has zero natural attraction to you, then it is very likely an infringement of her free will. There's nothing about DMSI that "forces" attraction. It's a set of instructions that causes you to focus energy in specific ways that makes you more sexually attractive. To me, it's no different than going to the gym and developing a muscular frame to increase your attraction to women (though I realize that hasn't worked for you, Enki). We're fortunate to have subs as a tool, and these tools give us an edge. Some guys get women with money, some with athleticism, some with intelligence, some with smooth talk and romance, or a combination of anything that increases their apparent value. Regardless, we're the small percentage that have the open mind to seek out the tools to advance ourselves in a way that others don't (subs). To me, if that leads me to enhance my aura, personal development, whatever - to be more attractive than everyone else in the room - that's my edge, and it's no different than anyone else who develops themselves in ways to edge out the competition. If a woman (or man) sees that as something she wants to be a part of, that's their choice. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Ryu - 12-29-2018 How is the progress on LTU Shannon? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 12-29-2018 (12-28-2018, 08:28 PM)robstar Wrote:(12-17-2018, 01:58 PM)Shannon Wrote:(12-17-2018, 01:50 PM)Tigerismyspirit Wrote:(12-17-2018, 10:45 AM)Tigerismyspirit Wrote:(12-17-2018, 10:16 AM)Shannon Wrote: If it will aid in doing that, it's already happening. And if not, no, it will not. The person to be affected must match the targeting pattern. Do you really think it would have taken this much work to make DMSI work if I was not trying to preserve free will on the part of both the user and the affected? There is a big difference between influencing someone and taking away their ability to choose for themselves. One is persuasion, and one is coercion. We want to persuade, which gives them the choice of what to do. We do not want to coerce, which does not. When a woman puts on makeup, is she forcing you to find her more sexually attractive? No. When she puts on a perfume with the intent of becoming more sexually attractive, is she forcing you? No. When she wears a sexy dress, is she forcing you? No. She is trying to use her charms to persuade and influence. But you still have free will, even if your animal brain is responding on instinct, and you can still choose to refuse her sex. If she and her friends hold you down and force you to have sex with them, or get you drunk and take advantage of you when you can't physically stop them, that's taking away free will. DMSI does nothing to take away free will. But by carelessly using manifestation (and it can be done intentionally as well) it is relatively easy to take away someone's free will. Manifesting a relationship or a specific outcome with a specific person forces that to happen, regardless of what they would have chosen had they had a say in the matter, and can go so far as to control their mind and emotions to result in that outcome. If you use manifestation to achieve an outcome of having sex with a hot redheaded server you know from your favorite lunch restaurant, when you know that she would not have chosen to do that on her own, you are taking away her free will to make her own choice. If she would have done it anyway, you wouldn't need to use manifestation. Any time you use manifestation to achieve a specific outcome with a specific person, you are taking away their free will to make their own choice in the matter. The consequences of such an action are severe, and I can attest to that from having made that mistake myself, before I knew what I was doing with this stuff. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 12-29-2018 (12-28-2018, 11:31 PM)josh84 Wrote: Hi Shannon, ive done 3 cycles on hybrid with headphones, and havent had any changes apart from maybe libido increase but that can also be caused by other factors too. I suggest you try hybrid, and play it at -40 dB for a cycle and see what happens. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 12-29-2018 (12-29-2018, 04:27 AM)DarkTempatation Wrote: @Shannon I wish Shannon releases LTU 5.5G out for new years day, that'll be a fantastic start to the new year! That's all I'm waiting for That is extremely unlikely, given the complexity of "sewing" these scripts together to make them all work as one. |