+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 12-21-2018
(12-20-2018, 09:44 PM)Dilectione Wrote: Wow Man you're all DMSI users are rocks!
My unique experience is I could make different 'personality' for different situation, it's almost similar to BASE MultiAura (or what it's called I forgot lol), and it gives me MUCH advantage in socializing or public speaking.
Oh and yeah, zero anxiety, zero, nill, zilch. I'm not talking about approach anxiety though, I couldn't care less about that stuff, not a pussy chaser, sorry.
Could you explain more regarding aura in my experience above @Shannon ?
Thanks!
The aura is designed to adjust itself for each affected person to prevent them from becoming uncomfortable as a result of how it affects them. The "different personality" thing isn't the aura, that's an aspect of your natural personality that is being brought into use by DMSI's Optimus Engine and the AutoPilot. Not everyone can do that, maybe 8% of the population can.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 12-21-2018
(12-21-2018, 01:07 AM)wolverine_i_am Wrote: Congrats on creating FRM 4.3 Shannon! What's new or how has it improved from 4.2?
It has more words now. It's a lot more complex, too. And the script is tagged in more colors. Mmmm, priddy colors.
lol
4.3 does something extremely important to the script of 4.2 that will make the experience much easier still to handle and much more effective, if the models are correct. I would love to tell you exactly what, but it's a secret. Suffice it to say that it should make FRM work even faster, more effectively, more powerfully and more successfully than 4.1 or 4.2.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 12-21-2018
(12-21-2018, 02:27 AM)dweller94 Wrote: Anyone know the frequency response on the Samsung s9+? I've been using it for my ultrasonic tracks, sounds smooth, no crackling whatsoever.
The Samsung Galaxy S series always had a FR of 20 Hz to 20 kHz, but somehow their Galaxy S series has a better audio reproduction than their other lower end phones at volumes above 12/15. Even the worst version of the Galaxy S (the 5 I think it was) for audio reproduction produced almost no crackling even at 15.
Meanwhile, the J3 I have crackles noticeably starting at 14 and gets obvious about it at 15. But they're listed as having the same frequency response, according to what I read.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 12-21-2018
(12-21-2018, 04:04 AM)josh84 Wrote: Hi Shannon, i got frequensee on the phone then went into settings to adjust the volume but on my htc its a sliding bar so there isnt 12-15 seperate things to increase decrease by.
You don't have a volume button on that phone? It's still going to be between 7 and 15 "clicks", but without a volume button you can't be very precise about setting it or even counting it.
Quote:So my best option would be 100/15 =6.66*12=79.92 so 80. So on my vlc media player through my computer maybe 80% volume is a good volume to try through hybrid ocean surf when i start my 3rd cycle on sunday?
Since there is no way for me to get 12 on my phone like you mention that im aware of thats the best i can come up with to try.
Unless you have a different opinion?
The volume that is optimal on a phone does not translate to the optimal volume on a computer. A phone has one volume control, and a computer may have 3+. 80% in VLC on a computer means nothing, because what volume are your speakers set to? What volume is the system volume set to? Do you have anything else altering the volume? And did you know that VLC's volume slider goes to 200% in some cases?
That's why you need to measure by decibels. On my phone, the volume reported by FrequenSee at 12/15 on an ultrasonic is ~-41 dB. That measurement depends on how far the microphone is from the source of the audio. In the case of my POS phone, it's facing down at the bottom of the phone, while the speaker is on the upper right corner. Diagonally, they are about 4" apart, but how does the direction of each and the placement adjust that? I don't know. I do know that it has held true for my J3 and it was also true on my Galaxy S phones.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - josh84 - 12-21-2018
Hi Shannon, so i just had vlc at 50% headphones on either side of the phone the last part on frequensee where it has the sharp up and down curve reaches just upto -40-45 bouncing around that range and back just under so between -55-45, at 80% on vlc it gets pushed up to the -30 range stopping just under -20.
If ultrasonic for you around -41 is good at 50% on vlc media player with headphones should be as close as i could get to being what you suggest? At 44% it is sitting on just the -40 just barely going above and below so anywhere around 44-50 should be best?
Im trying to get to the right volume that you suggest is best and this seems to be as close to that 41db number.
Maybe thats why results havent been noticed much since been too loud on hybrid?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Zane - 12-21-2018
Shannon,
Is it possible to create a sub that can melt belly fat? Just asking.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Sanbosay - 12-21-2018
(12-21-2018, 09:13 AM)Zane Wrote: Shannon,
Is it possible to create a sub that can melt belly fat? Just asking.
Exercise!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 12-21-2018
(12-21-2018, 07:48 AM)josh84 Wrote: Hi Shannon, so i just had vlc at 50% headphones on either side of the phone the last part on frequensee where it has the sharp up and down curve reaches just upto -40-45 bouncing around that range and back just under so between -55-45, at 80% on vlc it gets pushed up to the -30 range stopping just under -20.
If ultrasonic for you around -41 is good at 50% on vlc media player with headphones should be as close as i could get to being what you suggest? At 44% it is sitting on just the -40 just barely going above and below so anywhere around 44-50 should be best?
Im trying to get to the right volume that you suggest is best and this seems to be as close to that 41db number.
Maybe thats why results havent been noticed much since been too loud on hybrid?
Whatever brings your measurement at 4 inches from the speaker to about -40 dB.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 12-21-2018
(12-21-2018, 09:13 AM)Zane Wrote: Shannon,
Is it possible to create a sub that can melt belly fat? Just asking.
Melting belly fat while it is inside you would require a considerable amount of heat above what I recommend for living tissue. Nerves and all that.
Otherwise I don't know yet.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Zane - 12-21-2018
Shannon there are few 5.5G subs which does not have FRM in them like MLS, ARA, DRA and Exercise sub. Are u planning to update them with FRM module or You gonna just update them to just 6G.
I know u have lot of work to do but ever since FRM came out I keep wondering what would have if there are FRM in MLS.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 12-21-2018
(12-21-2018, 03:12 PM)Zane Wrote: Shannon there are few 5.5G subs which does not have FRM in them like MLS, ARA, DRA and Exercise sub. Are u planning to update them with FRM module or You gonna just update them to just 6G.
I know u have lot of work to do but ever since FRM came out I keep wondering what would have if there are FRM in MLS.
The only 5.5G subs that have FRM right now are USLM2/3 and DMSI 3.3. The rest will get an upgrade in 6G.
MLS is going to benefit a lot from FRM, but it's come to be something I really don't like working on. Yes, I know that FRM should solve the reasons I don't like it, but that doesn't make me like it any more. It also doesn't make me want to repeat building it more than once. That will be upgraded in 6G.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - RTBoss - 12-21-2018
(12-21-2018, 03:20 PM)Shannon Wrote: The only 5.5G subs that have FRM right now are USLM2/3, UMOP2, and DMSI 3.3. The rest will get an upgrade in 6G.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 12-21-2018
It clearly shows that I said that already in the quote, RTB!
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Quote - 12-21-2018
Hi Shannon, I am on USLM3 now. I was wondering if the FRM script is a general or a specific (to the goals of the sub) one?
Thank you