(09-22-2016, 09:05 AM)RoaringLion Wrote: I keep seeing you mention BEAST but since i don't keep up with the forum anymore like i used to, i have no idea what it is, please enlighten me

(09-22-2016, 03:49 AM)Shannon Wrote: We will get there if it is within my power. Sometimes I get discouraged, but there's always the next day when I realize that regardless of my discouragement or whatever else, the job must get done and I am not aware of everything. If I have been set on this path, there must be a good reason. So I soldier on.

(09-22-2016, 09:42 AM)CatMan Wrote: For V3, maybe having "the people of the gender that you find attractive" drop more obvious signs of attraction for you to pick up on if they are triggered by the program. And make us SEE them clearer and for what they are somehow, and have less doubt about it if we have that. I think many times we tend to discount "interest" because it is far more subtler than we would do, or seems normal and not interest at all, so we don't SEE them. Which creates an issue where maybe the sub IS working a lot better than people realise, but the signals just aren't being registered from those we are interested in to take action on.

Could we have women interpret the program's "aura" to act with interest the way a man would, ie. more obvious, direct and clear? That may not be possible, but just asking. If not, the other changes I mentioned would likely really help engagement with people possibly already responding to you.

(09-22-2016, 10:08 AM)eternitys_child Wrote:

(09-22-2016, 03:49 AM)Shannon Wrote: We will get there if it is within my power. Sometimes I get discouraged, but there's always the next day when I realize that regardless of my discouragement or whatever else, the job must get done and I am not aware of everything. If I have been set on this path, there must be a good reason. So I soldier on.

Well you shattered the ceilings of what was considered humanly possible, and continue to do so all the time. You're surely more than halfway "there" when it comes to dmsi.

And perhaps you'll uncover something as you finish GPR / MHS / MIR that will be useful for dmsi / 6g. Perhaps journals from the physical healing subs will provide you with crucial data you didn't know you needed. Just thinking out loud here...

Either way, have you ever gotten females to test any of the newer versions? If the sub works for them, you can safely say that you achieved the goal, but there's a missing element the gents are having trouble with, and the ladies' success will indicate something. So more versatile testing might also be useful there.

(09-22-2016, 10:47 AM)Shannon Wrote:

(09-22-2016, 09:42 AM)CatMan Wrote: For V3, maybe having "the people of the gender that you find attractive" drop more obvious signs of attraction for you to pick up on if they are triggered by the program. And make us SEE them clearer and for what they are somehow, and have less doubt about it if we have that. I think many times we tend to discount "interest" because it is far more subtler than we would do, or seems normal and not interest at all, so we don't SEE them. Which creates an issue where maybe the sub IS working a lot better than people realise, but the signals just aren't being registered from those we are interested in to take action on.

Could we have women interpret the program's "aura" to act with interest the way a man would, ie. more obvious, direct and clear? That may not be possible, but just asking. If not, the other changes I mentioned would likely really help engagement with people possibly already responding to you.

I'm certainly working on it. You guys who have the most trouble seem to give me the most ideas. Frustrating, but effective.

I think this will come about when I finish implementing P4, make the energy sourcing right for fully powering the program in real time, and adjust a few other things.

(09-22-2016, 09:42 AM)CatMan Wrote: For V3, maybe having "the people of the gender that you find attractive" drop more obvious signs of attraction for you to pick up on if they are triggered by the program. And make us SEE them clearer and for what they are somehow, and have less doubt about it if we have that. I think many times we tend to discount "interest" because it is far more subtler than we would do, or seems normal and not interest at all, so we don't SEE them. Which creates an issue where maybe the sub IS working a lot better than people realise, but the signals just aren't being registered from those we are interested in to take action on.

Could we have women interpret the program's "aura" to act with interest the way a man would, ie. more obvious, direct and clear? That may not be possible, but just asking. If not, the other changes I mentioned would likely really help engagement with people possibly already responding to you.

(09-22-2016, 11:11 AM)RisingSon Wrote: BEAST MODE ACTIVATED!!!

Simply amazing, stupendous, salutary!

What are the physical applications of this, I wonder... (D type?)

(09-22-2016, 11:52 AM)Shannon Wrote: How about we remember what DMSI is for - giving THEM the "balls to act", not you!