Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 09-18-2016 (09-16-2016, 07:48 PM)Shannon Wrote: My name is Shannon, thanks. Shortening it doesn't work. LOL! This reminds me of an old post I read awhile ago. This woman, called you "Shanny". I laughed so hard! And cringed so much, I aged 10 years in my face, no doubt. Thought I'd bring up that painful moment for you...time to fire up E2 to remove it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-18-2016 Generally, I only get that sort of thing from guys who are insecure or trying to start an argument, or women who are trying to emasculate me. The former get bored and stop when I ignore them. The latter get kicked out of my life. But yeah. My name doesn't work in nickname or shortened versions. It comes off as being disrespectful, and I don't take kindly to that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - ncbeareatingman - 09-18-2016 same here but in a different 'format' I detest meeting a FELLA online & he jumps right into "Hey Bud" which sounds like he's talking down to a 5 yr old. To Me "bud' is wally cleaver's friends whose freinds with leave it to beaver. he does NOT Live here. Im a grown ass 58 yr old man,to me such 'nicks' are presumtive,overly familiar,assumptive throw away terms, I Like the T shirt that say's "Dont Bro me ,if you dont know me", aint ch'er bro,your cuz, and I absolutley detest being reffered to as "hon' by another man. fukin hate it. the waitress at "Denny's" can call me 'hon' but NOT the truck driver dude! I get it Shannon and totally respect it ! RESPECT MUST COME FIRST and is in short order in this country these days. Kudu's Man. Keith. PS: Oh and while Im on it "LoL" is another one,waaayy da fuk over used, a lot of times looks juvenille,adolescent and insincere,to me. most adults are almost NEVER "LoL-ing" when they're writing sum'sum' out online. If I write "LoL" which is extremely rare for me to do so I REALLY TRULY AM LAUGHING OUT LOUD! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Churchill - 09-18-2016 (09-16-2016, 07:48 PM)Shannon Wrote:Thanks, I'm sorry about shortening your name Shannon, pretty alpha that you mentioned your dislike for it, or I'd have kept pissing you off without knowing. The way some of you talk in this forum tells me all I need to know about the efficacy of AM6(09-16-2016, 02:45 PM)Churchill Wrote: Hey Shann , I know it's a bit off topic but I'm just curious here.... I was told the mind could only detect motion/change/difference in the peripheral field, motion but not detail. So I guess you're saying that the CONCIOUS mind detects motion/change/difference but the SUBCONSCIOUS is getting both these and the detail.. I'd appreciate anyone's comment. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-18-2016 (09-18-2016, 11:45 AM)ncbeareatingman Wrote: same here but in a different 'format' I detest meeting a FELLA online & he jumps right into "Hey Bud" which sounds like he's talking down to a 5 yr old. To Me "bud' is wally cleaver's friends whose freinds with leave it to beaver. he does NOT Live here. Im a grown ass 58 yr old man,to me such 'nicks' are presumtive,overly familiar,assumptive throw away terms, I Like the T shirt that say's "Dont Bro me ,if you dont know me", aint ch'er bro,your cuz, and I absolutley detest being reffered to as "hon' by another man. fukin hate it. the waitress at "Denny's" can call me 'hon' but NOT the truck driver dude! I usually only type it when I am doing it also. I just happen to laugh more than most people because I like to have a positive outlook, and laughing makes me happy. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-18-2016 (09-18-2016, 01:15 PM)Churchill Wrote:(09-16-2016, 07:48 PM)Shannon Wrote:Thanks, I'm sorry about shortening your name Shannon, pretty alpha that you mentioned your dislike for it, or I'd have kept pissing you off without knowing. The way some of you talk in this forum tells me all I need to know about the efficacy of AM6(09-16-2016, 02:45 PM)Churchill Wrote: Hey Shann , I know it's a bit off topic but I'm just curious here.... Usually people don't intend to upset. That's why I say it when it doesn't work. There is a big difference between the range of perception between the conscious and subconscious minds. There are limits to the amount of detail that can be perceived peripherally for some very good reasons based in physics when it comes to vision, but the subconscious still extracts vastly more information than the conscious does, regardless of those limits. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 09-18-2016 (09-18-2016, 10:29 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-17-2016, 02:48 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Thinking out loud here: Lol, sorry man! I was drinking while watching the football game yesterday. I tend to say things I wouldn't say otherwise. Call it a moment of weakness. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Firas1 - 09-18-2016 (09-18-2016, 10:37 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-18-2016, 07:43 AM)Firas1 Wrote:(09-16-2016, 07:48 PM)Shannon Wrote: My name is Shannon, thanks. Shortening it doesn't work. Eh? I wasn't 'playing telephone' assuming everything was true. I just wanted to ask and find out about what seems like a good point. You have to question sometimes, so you can know what is the truth. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 09-18-2016 (09-17-2016, 03:07 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(09-17-2016, 02:48 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Thinking out loud here: Perhaps - but I'll have you know, I respect your decision to stick with E2 as long as you have. I've said it before. I perceived a trait in you, and others that have done the same, that I admire greatly. It's just the mental "split" that I have - that part of me that's unsure I did "the right thing," and is envious of you, that lashed out. So keep being, and doing, you. You've changed in some amazingly positive ways. You have a really bright future ahead of you, and I hope it only get brighter. :exclamation: RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 09-18-2016 (09-18-2016, 06:41 PM)RTBoss Wrote:(09-17-2016, 03:07 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(09-17-2016, 02:48 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Thinking out loud here: Thanks man! I appreciate the kind words. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - lokko - 09-19-2016 Offtopic: I bought premature ejaculation sub 5g but never really used it. Got tied up with health issues then dmsi...with 5.5 showing great potential i dont even want to go back to 5g. Will we ever see the premature ejaculation sub in 6g? I'm sure a lot of people on the forum feel the same way RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-19-2016 (09-18-2016, 04:50 PM)RTBoss Wrote:(09-18-2016, 10:29 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-17-2016, 02:48 PM)RTBoss Wrote: Thinking out loud here: Well if you feel this way, think about it from my point of view for a bit. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-19-2016 (09-18-2016, 04:54 PM)Firas1 Wrote:(09-18-2016, 10:37 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-18-2016, 07:43 AM)Firas1 Wrote:(09-16-2016, 07:48 PM)Shannon Wrote: My name is Shannon, thanks. Shortening it doesn't work. I did not intend to imply that you were playing telephone. However, if you look at how information about subliminals and their scripting is acquired, it is very much like a game of telephone. We start off with someone saying X is true, and then the next person reads it and assumes it's rue and copies it, and then the next person reads it from the other two and assumes it's true and not only copies it, but states that it is known fact, and then... Nobody's doing the research and experimentation to figure out what the truth is, except for me (and a few specialists in academic psychology, whose work is almost never read by anyone else outside the academic field). So over literally thousands of re-tellings, there is a lot of repetition of the same "facts" which gain fact status simply because they've been repeated by so many sources, not because they're actually factual. And the person who gets online looking for information is going to be beset with this sort of thing. Then they're going to come across me, who is doing all sorts of things that are said to not work, and of course they ask why I do what "doesn't work". We get this periodically, and of course I am happy to explain, because this needs to get out there. But the whole process just reminds me of a game of telephone. The fact is, short of doing the decades of research, and/or extensively experimenting for yourself, you couldn't possibly know the things that are true or otherwise about what's out there on the Internet. So you reading all that and then coming here and asking me why there is a discrepancy is a good thing. There was never any intention on my part to imply that you're playing telephone, and I apologize if it was worded in a way that seemed that way. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 09-19-2016 (09-19-2016, 12:48 AM)lokko Wrote: Offtopic: I bought premature ejaculation sub 5g but never really used it. Got tied up with health issues then dmsi...with 5.5 showing great potential i dont even want to go back to 5g. Yes. And one for overcoming ED. I can't wait to crush that stuff in 6G! |