![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-29-2016 (08-26-2016, 03:00 AM)Amann Wrote: Couple of general questions I was hoping the community could answer. If you are listening to the program for your own benefit, and you have a paid for copy, and they are exposed as a result of you using the program that you paid for for your own benefit, then you are within fair use rights, and you do not need to purchase anything. If, on the other hand, you want one or both of them to have access to using it then you need to purchase as many copies as is necessary for them to use it outside those parameters. For example, if you want to purchase it for dad, and dad always uses it while mom is around, then you only need one additional copy paid for. But if mom and dad want to use it while the other is not around, then they each need their own paid copy. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-29-2016 (08-26-2016, 04:13 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon, I am glad you guys are providing me this data, but there's some piece of information I am still missing. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-29-2016 (08-26-2016, 05:01 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Quick question Shannon! Just do what feels natural. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-29-2016 (08-29-2016, 10:37 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I think it's just a case of resistance. I think you guys need to understand that the sub doesn't make you beta. It is instructing you to do what will lead to sex by meeting the other person half way in their attraction response. If your subconscious believes that means being what you consider beta, then: A) You may be misunderstanding what beta is. B) You may be misunderstanding what alpha is. C) You may be trying to execute subconscious programming in that direction that is still based in fear, which leads to beta behavior. D) Your subconscious mind knows something your conscious mind does not. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-29-2016 (08-26-2016, 11:59 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon, I haven't studied the correlations between piercings and other things enough to really be able to speak on this. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 08-29-2016 (08-29-2016, 07:23 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-26-2016, 04:13 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon, What is it that you're missing? Or is it a matter of "you'll know it when you see it but you don't know what it is"? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 08-29-2016 (08-29-2016, 07:36 PM)Steven Wrote:(08-29-2016, 07:23 PM)Shannon Wrote:(08-26-2016, 04:13 AM)Steven Wrote: Shannon, Let's say we have a simple equation, A = B + C + D. In this case, we know C, and we know D, but we are not getting an A that matches C + D. So there must be at least one variable we are missing (A), and we don't know what it's value is. I know it's missing because the parts of the equation I have don't match the answer. But I don't know what it is that's missing. And until I have enough information, I cannot know or figure it out. So the only options we have to gather more data are... wait and keep observing, or add more things to the script. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Lowe - 08-30-2016 Shannon, before MSI, there were no public testing for a subliminal, and the longer single-stages took a couple of months at most (EPRHA 2.0) to come out fully fleshed out, and it appears to work like a charm for its users. Meanwhile, it has been fully 3 months since the first MSI came out, and we're still not quite near the desired results. In fact, it would seem we're moving backwards in terms of results. Despite 3 successive revisions, V1 had the most noticeable impacts for me as well. Perhaps it is time to re-evaluate? Did you use only models and private testing before to quickly determine if a subliminal works? Would that speed up the process? Surely future 5.5G+ subliminals will not have the long gestation we currently have with MSI? And when do you plan on finishing the 2.x series and move on to V3? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - AriGold - 08-30-2016 Shannon, thank you for the testing experience, we all learned much by doing it. Couple of questions to DMSI: - When will a final version be available that brings the results that are promised on the selling page? We all bought it according to what is promised, but at the moment the outcome seems unknown. If we had started right away with SM3, we would be half through. Now we have 3 months in DAOSI, DMSI 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 and still the results are not overwhelming. - What is the reason that the version with the healing module didn't work that great? I mean, a lot of people here are talking about big inner changes and much more confidence on 2.3 - what does the healing module do? I thought healing would take away the GSF and make us confident, but it seems like it is the other way round. I personally don't see the anger as a problem, we just might not be used to it at the moment and have to find a way to deal with it. Let's call it boldness and it is something positive ![]() - What is the difference between V1 and V2.3? In the first version many of us were surprised by the aura generation. But there were some inconsistencies. We could not control it, sometimes it was there, sometimes it wasn't. It also wasn't the right target area of the people we were attracted to (too young or too old). Only that one and the hunger needed to be fixed in my opinion. - I am not sure I want to ask about any more programs in 5.5G. If we want Ultra Success in an upgraded version, we will have so many other things in it, a healing module, a success aura or whatever, but all we wanted is a good program updated. If it becomes much more, it won't be the same anymore. Sometimes simplicity is king. - What are the informations that you need to finish a successful version of DMSI? Is it about our internal state? About our reactions to the outer world? About the reactions of the outer world to us? Do you need suggestions for a solution - then what kind of suggestions? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Frosted - 08-30-2016 Shannon do you plan on upgrading LTU to 5.5g or 6g in the near future? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RoaringLion - 08-30-2016 I had no problem with V2.2, i just wanted to see if the aura could be made more powerful. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shadow2200 - 08-30-2016 DMSI 2.2 helped a lot more then a lot of other subs i had used before. Keep the healing coming shannon RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 08-30-2016 There's something wrong with DMSI, Hopefully we can figure out what so we can move forward & obtain better results RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 08-30-2016 Shannon, "To my surprise, the new technology idea has survived modeling for two rounds against 14 other competing concepts. I have more rounds of modeling to do, but it is looking promising." Would you please tell us more about this new technology? |