Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Churchill - 08-17-2016 (08-17-2016, 06:13 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote:(08-17-2016, 05:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: He was our resident troll just waiting patiently until we forgot about him so he could start causing issues again. Guys guys, I don't think he meant any trouble, or was the 'troll'. From the way he sent me a private message on what sub's I was using, he sounded more like one who has used all the snake oils out there without results, and just wanted to be sure he was in the right place. But I guess I may be wrong, he doesn't really strike me as a troll. Trolls aren't looking for Shannon's sub's, they're looking to speak illof it without trying. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - DarthXedonias - 08-17-2016 (08-17-2016, 10:31 PM)yeah! Wrote: Oh right so was novacane sash? I was guessing he was since I don't see Sash's thread about "DMSI refund policy" anymore. Looks like our resident "troll" decided to make 2 fake accounts again today and I doubt Ben was wrong since I believe, correct me if I'm wrong, Ben can see the IP addresses connected with the accounts. Kinda of a shame that this keeps on happening. I actually liked a lot of Ryan's threads, before he deleted them, and posts back in the day. But all this trolling has definitely lowered my opinion of him. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 08-18-2016 (08-17-2016, 06:46 PM)K-Train Wrote: @Chaosvrgn: Great report man! Definitely setting the tone for V2.3. I'm hoping V2.3 delivers similar results I want v2.3 to be focused on developping the sexiest, hottest, most alluring & beautiful possible aura or vibe, the strongest, most powerful, most irresistible aura, not on getting sex, I think that'swhy most dont get results. By getting the best aura possible, you'll attract the sex naturally.Let's learn what we can do with auras so we can make it the best ever. I did DMSI for week and saw no results, another guy did it for 4 weeks and saw no results. Let get back tothe basics. The goal phrasing should be on developping an aura RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jones - 08-18-2016 (08-16-2016, 08:13 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: When you've been one for ten years and you're off on your own, you tend to lose touch with the common person. For example (and no offense, Shannon): The idea of taking all things related to women out of AM7 sounds crazy to me. The sexual drive for women is primal, and we have the elites hijacking that drive for their own personal gain. It stands to reason that being an alpha male involves fighting off the mental and intellectual chains they use to bind us. YES. This! ^^^ So much this! That is one of the most profound things I have read on this board for some time. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 08-18-2016 I have an idea maybe DMSI V3 or V2.3 can project multiple auras like sex magnet does. What kind of auras would you guys like to see & how many ? I say 2-4 but to really stretch the limits let's try 10. That way we can see what's truly possible. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 08-18-2016 Shannon, What happens when an irresiteble force meets immovable object? And Cant you add Psychic Seduction in DMSI. Your version or it to avoid negative reprecussions was to just project a state on the other person which we do unconciously already. Maybe in DMSI you can make the user be able to project the feelings of attraction via ITMSS but now you are tasked to develop another 6G tecnology which would be the Exo version of this to use on other people using your energies. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 08-18-2016 (08-18-2016, 06:21 PM)Hercules Wrote: Shannon,Yes, projecting feelings of attraction should definitely go into DMSI. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 08-18-2016 (08-18-2016, 06:07 PM)rayrocanaldo Wrote:(08-17-2016, 06:46 PM)K-Train Wrote: @Chaosvrgn: Great report man! Definitely setting the tone for V2.3. I'm hoping V2.3 delivers similar results If only Shannon would tell us what the goal phrasing's wording has been focused on for each version. We'll have to wait for v3 to see how it behaves, but whatever the goal phrasing for v1, it seemed like it was going in the right direction. Unfortunately, v3 is a shift in both goal phrasing and energy sourcing (compared to v1). Maybe if it under performs, we get a version that uses v1's goal phrasing and keeps the improved energy sourcing. We'll just have to wait and see. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Raykon - 08-18-2016 Shannon. An idea I came up with today that you may or may not already implement in your programs Simple idea but I think it will be a major improvement if it's not already added. Breathing is very important, and most people don't breath properly and with the right rythym. Most people hold there breath in too long and breathing doesn't flow. learn how to make it so that the sub causes you to breath properly and consistently in a nice even flow throughout the day. More oxygen to the brain and it allows your body to release tension and relaxes your body language. I notice when I'm not breathing properly my body language suffers. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 08-19-2016 (08-18-2016, 08:35 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Unfortunately, v3 is a shift in both goal phrasing and energy sourcing (compared to v1). Maybe if it under performs, we get a version that uses v1's goal phrasing and keeps the improved energy sourcing. We'll just have to wait and see. I know you're using E2. You didn't experience each version of DMSI as I did. V1's goal phrasing was the same (or very similar) to BIABWS. It was hit or miss, but the aura was very apparent. And it always seemed to affect older women the most. I affected more women I found attractive on 2.1, and 2.2 would have been amazing if the aura didn't have a conflict in the scripting. Don't glorify V1 when you didn't run it - it wasn't that great. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 08-19-2016 (08-19-2016, 04:54 AM)RTBoss Wrote:(08-18-2016, 08:35 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Unfortunately, v3 is a shift in both goal phrasing and energy sourcing (compared to v1). Maybe if it under performs, we get a version that uses v1's goal phrasing and keeps the improved energy sourcing. We'll just have to wait and see. Gotcha. I am going 100% off what I've been reading. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jones - 08-19-2016 I purchased DMSI for use after E2. While I have not listened to it yet, I believe it will get where it should be going, so I made a speculative buy. That said, I keep reading about the "healing" in DMSI and it got me to thinking... I am a big fan of a tool that does one job REALLY well (Linux user here). Why put ANY kind of "healing" focus into a subliminal that is designed to stimulate purely sexual contact with the opposite sex? You want healing? Buy E2. The "kitchen sink" approach seems more likely to muddy the waters. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 08-19-2016 There is two things I dislike about DMSI. It's the goal phrasing for getting sex & the gender neutral thing ( towards every person of the gender I am attracted to thing ). The original Aura Of Sexiness could already be used by anybody of any sexual orientation. It was already gender neutral. It said on the website : " This title can be used by either gender, and can be used successfully by anyone of any sexual orientation. " AOS was already gender neutral. No need to make it gender neutral, the thing is gender neutral already. I think it makes the sub less effective cause The original AOS was effective as fuck without it. You can check the testimonial section for testimonials of AOS. Next is the goal phrasing. You can get the sex indirectly by working on the aura. Remember how frenchmagnet got sex with 70% of the beautiful women he knew in a group. The goal phrasing should be about building the hottest, sexiest & most alluring aura of irresistible sexiness possible not on getting sex. I think focusing on trying to get sex, makes it less effective. Anyways thats my 2 cent. What do you guys think. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Sickologist - 08-19-2016 AOS only works if you're comfortable pulling the trigger. It is what you say, you only project an aura of sexiness. The results gives a boost in confidence. Women want to use you, and that makes you draw your own conclusions in the end. With DMSI, you already have the screening taken care of. So if you get IOI's it's a no brainer. I didn't journal most of my 15 months of using AOS. Did I have better results? Yes, but this new thing is in testing process. v1 however, was blatant as hell. If 2.3 gets back to that level, it'll be awesome. AOS was subtle, but the long term efffects speaks for themselves. All in all, nobody is stopping you from running AOS if you want to. But don't expect it to be a magic pill. Most users were describing moderate IOI's that they didn't even act on, then stopped to do AM. I acted on almost any IOI, obvious or subtle. |