Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Churchill - 08-17-2016

(08-17-2016, 06:13 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote:
(08-17-2016, 05:54 PM)Benjamin Wrote: He was our resident troll just waiting patiently until we forgot about him so he could start causing issues again.

Ya know I'm not surprised. I was starting to suspect it was him but didn't say anything because I might have been wrong. Good to see my intuition was correct.

Guys guys, I don't think he meant any trouble, or was the 'troll'. From the way he sent me a private message on what sub's I was using, he sounded more like one who has used all the snake oils out there without results, and just wanted to be sure he was in the right place. But I guess I may be wrong, he doesn't really strike me as a troll. Trolls aren't looking for Shannon's sub's, they're looking to speak illof it without trying.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - DarthXedonias - 08-17-2016

(08-17-2016, 10:31 PM)yeah! Wrote: Oh right so was novacane sash?

I was guessing he was since I don't see Sash's thread about "DMSI refund policy" anymore. Looks like our resident "troll" decided to make 2 fake accounts again today and I doubt Ben was wrong since I believe, correct me if I'm wrong, Ben can see the IP addresses connected with the accounts. Kinda of a shame that this keeps on happening. I actually liked a lot of Ryan's threads, before he deleted them, and posts back in the day. But all this trolling has definitely lowered my opinion of him.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 08-18-2016

(08-17-2016, 06:46 PM)K-Train Wrote: @Chaosvrgn: Great report man! Definitely setting the tone for V2.3. I'm hoping V2.3 delivers similar results

@RTBoss: Yeah I've been getting residual effects from V2.2 particularly the healing module. I feel chill as f*ck and I've been doing things that normally would cause fear without even thinking twice.

I want v2.3 to be focused on developping the sexiest, hottest, most alluring & beautiful possible aura or vibe, the strongest, most powerful, most irresistible aura, not on getting sex, I think that'swhy most dont get results. By getting the best aura possible, you'll attract the sex naturally.Let's learn what we can do with auras so we can make it the best ever.
I did DMSI for week and saw no results, another guy did it for 4 weeks and saw no results. Let get back tothe basics. The goal phrasing should be on developping an aura


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jones - 08-18-2016

(08-16-2016, 08:13 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: When you've been one for ten years and you're off on your own, you tend to lose touch with the common person. For example (and no offense, Shannon): The idea of taking all things related to women out of AM7 sounds crazy to me. The sexual drive for women is primal, and we have the elites hijacking that drive for their own personal gain. It stands to reason that being an alpha male involves fighting off the mental and intellectual chains they use to bind us.

YES. This! ^^^ So much this!

That is one of the most profound things I have read on this board for some time.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 08-18-2016

I have an idea maybe DMSI V3 or V2.3 can project multiple auras like sex magnet does. What kind of auras would you guys like to see & how many ? I say 2-4 but to really stretch the limits let's try 10. That way we can see what's truly possible.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 08-18-2016

Shannon,


What happens when an irresiteble force meets immovable object?

And


Cant you add Psychic Seduction in DMSI. Your version or it to avoid negative reprecussions was to just project a state on the other person which we do unconciously already. Maybe in DMSI you can make the user be able to project the feelings of attraction via ITMSS but now you are tasked to develop another 6G tecnology which would be the Exo version of this to use on other people using your energies.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 08-18-2016

(08-18-2016, 06:21 PM)Hercules Wrote: Shannon,


What happens when an irresiteble force meets immovable object?

And


Cant you add Psychic Seduction in DMSI. Your version or it to avoid negative reprecussions was to just project a state on the other person which we do unconciously already. Maybe in DMSI you can make the user be able to project the feelings of attraction via ITMSS but now you are tasked to develop another 6G tecnology which would be the Exo version of this to use on other people using your energies.
Yes, projecting feelings of attraction should definitely go into DMSI.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 08-18-2016

(08-18-2016, 06:07 PM)rayrocanaldo Wrote:
(08-17-2016, 06:46 PM)K-Train Wrote: @Chaosvrgn: Great report man! Definitely setting the tone for V2.3. I'm hoping V2.3 delivers similar results

@RTBoss: Yeah I've been getting residual effects from V2.2 particularly the healing module. I feel chill as f*ck and I've been doing things that normally would cause fear without even thinking twice.

I want v2.3 to be focused on developping the sexiest, hottest, most alluring & beautiful possible aura or vibe, the strongest, most powerful, most irresistible aura, not on getting sex, I think that'swhy most dont get results. By getting the best aura possible, you'll attract the sex naturally.Let's learn what we can do with auras so we can make it the best ever.
I did DMSI for week and saw no results, another guy did it for 4 weeks and saw no results. Let get back tothe basics. The goal phrasing should be on developping an aura

If only Shannon would tell us what the goal phrasing's wording has been focused on for each version.

We'll have to wait for v3 to see how it behaves, but whatever the goal phrasing for v1, it seemed like it was going in the right direction.

Unfortunately, v3 is a shift in both goal phrasing and energy sourcing (compared to v1). Maybe if it under performs, we get a version that uses v1's goal phrasing and keeps the improved energy sourcing. We'll just have to wait and see.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Raykon - 08-18-2016

Shannon. An idea I came up with today that you may or may not already implement in your programs

Simple idea but I think it will be a major improvement if it's not already added.

Breathing is very important, and most people don't breath properly and with the right rythym. Most people hold there breath in too long and breathing doesn't flow.

learn how to make it so that the sub causes you to breath properly and consistently in a nice even flow throughout the day. More oxygen to the brain and it allows your body to release tension and relaxes your body language.

I notice when I'm not breathing properly my body language suffers.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RTBoss - 08-19-2016

(08-18-2016, 08:35 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Unfortunately, v3 is a shift in both goal phrasing and energy sourcing (compared to v1). Maybe if it under performs, we get a version that uses v1's goal phrasing and keeps the improved energy sourcing. We'll just have to wait and see.

I know you're using E2. You didn't experience each version of DMSI as I did. V1's goal phrasing was the same (or very similar) to BIABWS. It was hit or miss, but the aura was very apparent. And it always seemed to affect older women the most. I affected more women I found attractive on 2.1, and 2.2 would have been amazing if the aura didn't have a conflict in the scripting. Don't glorify V1 when you didn't run it - it wasn't that great.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 08-19-2016

(08-19-2016, 04:54 AM)RTBoss Wrote:
(08-18-2016, 08:35 PM)maxx55 Wrote: Unfortunately, v3 is a shift in both goal phrasing and energy sourcing (compared to v1). Maybe if it under performs, we get a version that uses v1's goal phrasing and keeps the improved energy sourcing. We'll just have to wait and see.

I know you're using E2. You didn't experience each version of DMSI as I did. V1's goal phrasing was the same (or very similar) to BIABWS. It was hit or miss, but the aura was very apparent. And it always seemed to affect older women the most. I affected more women I found attractive on 2.1, and 2.2 would have been amazing if the aura didn't have a conflict in the scripting. Don't glorify V1 when you didn't run it - it wasn't that great.

Gotcha. I am going 100% off what I've been reading.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jones - 08-19-2016

I purchased DMSI for use after E2. While I have not listened to it yet, I believe it will get where it should be going, so I made a speculative buy.

That said, I keep reading about the "healing" in DMSI and it got me to thinking...

I am a big fan of a tool that does one job REALLY well (Linux user here).

Why put ANY kind of "healing" focus into a subliminal that is designed to stimulate purely sexual contact with the opposite sex?

You want healing? Buy E2.

The "kitchen sink" approach seems more likely to muddy the waters.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 08-19-2016

There is two things I dislike about DMSI. It's the goal phrasing for getting sex & the gender neutral thing ( towards every person of the gender I am attracted to thing ).

The original Aura Of Sexiness could already be used by anybody of any sexual orientation. It was already gender neutral. It said on the website : " This title can be used by either gender, and can be used successfully by anyone of any sexual orientation. " AOS was already gender neutral. No need to make it gender neutral, the thing is gender neutral already. I think it makes the sub less effective cause The original AOS was effective as fuck without it. You can check the testimonial section for testimonials of AOS.

Next is the goal phrasing. You can get the sex indirectly by working on the aura. Remember how frenchmagnet got sex with 70% of the beautiful women he knew in a group. The goal phrasing should be about building the hottest, sexiest & most alluring aura of irresistible sexiness possible not on getting sex. I think focusing on trying to get sex, makes it less effective. Anyways thats my 2 cent. What do you guys think.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Sickologist - 08-19-2016

AOS only works if you're comfortable pulling the trigger. It is what you say, you only project an aura of sexiness. The results gives a boost in confidence. Women want to use you, and that makes you draw your own conclusions in the end.

With DMSI, you already have the screening taken care of. So if you get IOI's it's a no brainer. I didn't journal most of my 15 months of using AOS. Did I have better results? Yes, but this new thing is in testing process. v1 however, was blatant as hell. If 2.3 gets back to that level, it'll be awesome. AOS was subtle, but the long term efffects speaks for themselves. All in all, nobody is stopping you from running AOS if you want to. But don't expect it to be a magic pill. Most users were describing moderate IOI's that they didn't even act on, then stopped to do AM. I acted on almost any IOI, obvious or subtle.