![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 03:00 AM)yeah! Wrote: Did Ricardo get banned or sidelined or something? Nah, he's still around but him and Shannon don't exactly see eye to eye. Here's what kind of kicked off their...disagreement. (08-08-2016, 09:08 AM)Ricardo Wrote:(08-06-2016, 04:06 PM)Shannon Wrote: I don't feel the aura at all anymore. Ever. But I sure as hell am getting the results! This leads me to believe that the aura is being projected on one or more "frequency bands" that are difficult to consciously sense, and/or that it can be gotten used to. Here's Shannon's response --> http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7535-post-125863.html#pid125863 Ricardo's response to that post --> http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7535-post-125969.html#pid125969 I'll sum it up like this in the most objective way I can...for Ricardo (and he can correct me if I'm wrong) DMSI will only truly be a "success" when it can accomplish (one of) its main design goals which is creating an aura of sexiness so strong that attractive women (or technically attractive people of the gender you're attracted to) approach the user on a regular basis. Or at minimum, come damn near close to it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 08-16-2016 I thought the issue was that Ricardo was discrediting Shannon's experience in reading body language and understanding women and what their iois mean. Plus that he was judging DMSI as if it was already the final retail ready product instead of a work in progress. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 08-16-2016 Ricardo's making the same mistake as a lot of other people -- they want the woman to initiate sex the way a man would. Overtly and aggressively. Women aren't going to initiate sex in the middle of the food court at the mall. They keep referring to DMSI as an "IOI generator," not realizing that when a woman's giving IOI's, especially to the level that DMSI provokes, they're already soaking wet and they're just waiting for you to make a move. This isn't theory or speculation -- I've personally seen it play out like that while running my DMSI tests. EDIT: Sorry if this is TMI, but TWICE while running DMSI and it led to the "target goal," I remember being absolutely shocked at how wet the woman was. The first time, with "M," it was absolutely absurd. Never had that experience before. EDIT EDIT: I guess for me, I never really expected DMSI turn men into the selectors and women into the chasers, so when I used it and got my version of good results (making the escalation process from chatting to sex SUPER EASY), I was ecstatic. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 08-16-2016 Yeah Maxx55 you're right and the particular post you're referring to is also included in one of the links I posted. Again, I don't agree with how he stated his initial question but I can understand where both Ricardo and Shannon are coming from. To some extent, Ricardo may be right in that DMSI might not become as powerful as it COULD become however Shannon's already explained why certain things that could improve DMSI's effects can't be included due to Shannon's own principles. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 07:37 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: Ricardo's making the same mistake as a lot of other people -- they want the woman to initiate sex the way a man would. Overtly and aggressively. Women aren't going to initiate sex in the middle of the food court at the mall. Yeah I agree man. Although we have to acknowledge though Chaos that because Shannon made the design goal what it is (cause attractive people to initiate physical sex) people are going to keep focusing on that and using it to judge the overall program despite all the other things the program is doing right. However, here's the kicker though Chaosvrgn and you just mentioned it...the women who are affected who give these IOI's might believe that they ARE initiating sex. I've seen it before where a woman shoots a guy a barrel full of IOI's, the guy doesn't recognize it, and she gets frustrated because in her mind she's like "well damn, I made it OBVIOUS I want you to f*ck me, what gives?" EDIT: Hey Chaos, I asked in a previous thread, but you probably didn't this question: how has life been since the thing with M? She hasn't tried any funny shit has she? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 07:45 AM)K-Train Wrote:(08-16-2016, 07:37 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: Ricardo's making the same mistake as a lot of other people -- they want the woman to initiate sex the way a man would. Overtly and aggressively. Women aren't going to initiate sex in the middle of the food court at the mall. Yea, Shannon is definitely an expert hype man. However, I refuse to believe that he's actively trying to mislead his customer base to generate profits. My personal theory is: he's a little disconnected from the modern man and miscalculated just how much society f*cked up male masculinity and assumed that DMSI would work as well for us as it does for him. For example: I've resisted a lot of societal conditioning AND I've been running AM6 for a year. In my head, when I saw "M" giving me crotch shots, I took immediate action and just jumped on it. That's because my psyche's been purged of a lot of gunk and I recognized that IOI for what it was -- "please, please, don't say anything, just take me now." Also, being an entrepreneur has the effect of disconnecting you. I've been one for a little under a year and it's completely changed the way I approach the world. For one thing, without fear of losing my job or livelihood for not being PC, I say and do whatever the hell I please and laugh at those who get angry -- they have NO recourse because my business isn't attached to my name AT ALL. When you've been one for ten years and you're off on your own, you tend to lose touch with the common person. For example (and no offense, Shannon): The idea of taking all things related to women out of AM7 sounds crazy to me. The sexual drive for women is primal, and we have the elites hijacking that drive for their own personal gain. It stands to reason that being an alpha male involves fighting off the mental and intellectual chains they use to bind us. But anyway... About M. I've been actively avoiding her because I'm starting to feel a lil guilty about what happened. I finally hung out with them this past weekend. Nothing happened. There were a few "naughty" moments when someone would make a joke about cheating, or something would happen on the television and we'd glance at each other with a "knowing" smirk. She also kept finding reasons to rub my shoulder. There's attraction still there, but nothing overt. We'll see what happens with v2.3... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 08-16-2016 Chaosvrgn Wrote:Yea, Shannon is definitely an expert hype man. However, I refuse to believe that he's actively trying to mislead his customer base to generate profits. My personal theory is: he's a little disconnected from the modern man and miscalculated just how much society f*cked up male masculinity and assumed that DMSI would work as well for us as it does for him. For example: I've resisted a lot of societal conditioning AND I've been running AM6 for a year. In my head, when I saw "M" giving me crotch shots, I took immediate action and just jumped on it. That's because my psyche's been purged of a lot of gunk and I recognized that IOI for what it was -- "please, please, don't say anything, just take me now." I agree with most of this. I definitely don't think Shannon intentionally wanted to mislead anyone and that the purpose of DMSI's design goal was to aim for the stars and see how close he could get which lines up with who he is as a person. And he's getting close. Very close imo. I can see what you're saying on the detachment thing but I think this is negated a bit by the fact that Shannon really does listen to his customers and tries to appease them as much as he can which is sometimes to his detriment. The societal conditioning definitely is a factor as well and contributes to a lot of the fear, guilt, and shame that other guys as well as myself have experienced that is no doubting affecting results. I feel that minus the goal phrasing mistake mentioned, DMSI V2.2 would have been the ideal choice for those who want long term success due to its healing modules. When V2.3 is released I'm curious to see if one (or all) of these three things happens: 1.) Most of the guys get great results which includes women showing blatant attraction and initiating sex 2.) If the guys who do get results sabotage themselves repeatedly (which may indicate some guilt, shame and fear needing to be eradicated) 3.) Nobody gets results. ![]() I doubt #3 will happen but #1 and #2 I'm most curious about since there's no more healing modules. I think it does stand to reason though based off a post I read by forum member bits a couple days ago that even guys who struggle with women could improve themselves so long as DMSI works to continually give them enough opportunities. EDIT: Thanks for the quick answer CV. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - rayrocanaldo - 08-16-2016 I think adding eye contact, flirtation, body language into aura of sexiness V3 is not going to be useful. The program should be about developing an aura of sexiness, so powerful & strong it magnetically attracts women to you. I highly doubt adding flirtation, body language into it will make it better. We should focus on how can we make the aura/vibe/energy stronger & better. Let's focus on what we cannot see ( the aura ) vs what we can see ( body language, eye contact, flirtation, etc...) RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - 4Kingdoms - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 08:53 AM)rayrocanaldo Wrote: I think adding eye contact, flirtation, body language into aura of sexiness V3 is not going to be useful. The program should be about developing an aura of sexiness, so powerful & strong it magnetically attracts women to you. I highly doubt adding flirtation, body language into it will make it better. We should focus on how can we make the aura/vibe/energy stronger & better. Let's focus on what we cannot see ( the aura ) vs what we can see ( body language, eye contact, flirtation, etc...) LOL, Ray... let's see what v2.3 can do first!! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 08-16-2016 When i first used ASC before AM i was getting insane situational confidence, i was in my best state in my life just talking to people at school and just them talking back to me i was so happy my state was insane. Yet i was still beta inside. I tried some stuff i saw on youtube on the hottest girl i've personally ever seen, then she got so crazy about me she was almost asking me to put it in but because i was beta inside i blew my chance. So the point im getting at is when a girl truley likes you you'd get way more than simple ioi's and i tell you this girl was the most uptight person i've ever seen but because i was in my best state she was into me like crazy. Now i think about it i have probably used up a lifetime of luck to get a girl like her to like a the beta i was. It wasnt even me its like i won 3 lotteries in a row. So how far a girl would go for you should be even more if you were sexually irresistable and not just get some iois. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Ricardo - 08-16-2016 Chaosvrgn "Ricardo's making the same mistake as a lot of other people -- they want the woman to initiate sex the way a man would. Overtly and aggressively. Women aren't going to initiate sex in the middle of the food court at the mall. " No I understand that but women are tenacious and can be aggressive pursuers if they want the bloke enough. Believe me they will find ways of getting their man and will only fail if the man isn't interested at all. But they have to be THAT INTERESTED to begin with. They may smile or stare at you but they will follow it up if it doesn't get results..bumping into you or something else to get your attention, even if it's days later. When you are in the line of fire you can't do anything wrong ![]() K-Train " To some extent, Ricardo may be right in that DMSI might not become as powerful as it COULD become however Shannon's already explained why certain things that could improve DMSI's effects can't be included due to Shannon's own principles." Yes, after Shannon stated the limitations it went from being a sub that will make you irresistible, aggressively pursued and laid by hot women who you wouldn't normally get the chance to have...to a sub that is actually just going to put you in the best possible light, but don't expect to score with women who previously didn't find you desirable. K-train "Shannon made the design goal what it is (cause attractive people to initiate physical sex) people are going to keep focusing on that and using it to judge the overall program despite all the other things the program is doing right. Strange isn't it! You might be happy to go into a grocers for cabbages and come out with carrots but I'm not. I just don't want to see guys here promised a hurricane of lust filled craziness only to end up with a wet fart. While Shannon may have a shed load of acronyms when he talks about his work, it doesn't mean anything until they produce the results he's saying. Ultimately he will be judged on his products, not his claptrap. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - 4Kingdoms - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 08:50 AM)K-Train Wrote:Chaosvrgn Wrote:Yea, Shannon is definitely an expert hype man. However, I refuse to believe that he's actively trying to mislead his customer base to generate profits. My personal theory is: he's a little disconnected from the modern man and miscalculated just how much society f*cked up male masculinity and assumed that DMSI would work as well for us as it does for him. For example: I've resisted a lot of societal conditioning AND I've been running AM6 for a year. In my head, when I saw "M" giving me crotch shots, I took immediate action and just jumped on it. That's because my psyche's been purged of a lot of gunk and I recognized that IOI for what it was -- "please, please, don't say anything, just take me now." You will get reports of no results because most guys, myself included, just don't see the blatant iois they are getting. http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7716-post-123589.html#pid123589 This photo taken by RTBoss is a great example. He saw something that I did not!! I currently have two women coworkers that aren't my type actively pursuing me. While I agree it is great for social proof, I prefer to get iois from the type I am attracted to. I know these two female coworkers are DTF. Some would say I didn't get results because I didn't get laid. Does it mean I'm experiencing GSF?? Is this about getting another notch in your belt or saying no until "your type" is attracted to you?? When a beautiful (attractive) woman says no to all the men that are trying to seduce her. Is she being choosy or is it GSF?? I think most would agree she is being choosy. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - K-Train - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 09:22 AM)Ricardo Wrote: No I understand that but women are tenacious and can be aggressive pursuers if they want the bloke enough. Believe me they will find ways of getting their man and will only fail if the man isn't interested at all. But they have to be THAT INTERESTED to begin with. They may smile or stare at you but they will Agreed. Ricardo Wrote:Yes, after Shannon stated the limitations it went from being a sub that will make you irresistible, aggressively pursued and laid by hot women who you wouldn't normally get the chance to have...to a sub that is actually just going to put you in the best possible light, but don't expect to score with women who This is actually false. Chaosvrgn is living proof that a woman who had no interest in you can be influenced to want to f*ck you. Other guys (Minititan and Kenpachi I believe) also had women (who were relatively attractive from my understanding) pretty much mount them. So the sub CAN work. The rest of this post will be addressed towards the end. Ricardo Wrote:Strange isn't it! You might be happy to go into a grocers for cabbages and Now based off this I will assume that you are talking specifically about the program achieving the design goal of getting attractive individuals (in our case attractive women) approaching you and initiating sex correct? Now, bear in mind what we are conducting here are TESTS. All these programs from the V1-V2 series of DMSI/AOSI are all TEST programs. So, you are correct in that none of them have been able to consistently achieve the main design goal. My question to you is this. Does it mean absolutely nothing if Shannon gets this program to a point to where it a) allows the self-effects (which may or may not be meaningless to you) working for most individuals and b) is able to make it so that women show blatant signs of attraction (whatever your definition of blatant is) consistently shy of outright telling you "I want you to f*ck me" (at least without you opening your mouth and speaking to her and asking yourself ![]() Now, here's where you and I are in agreement Ricardo. I follow your grocery store analogy and I believe that if Shannon is NOT able to make the program achieve its specific design goal as it is now then I agree that he SHOULD change the goal of this program (in V3) to reflect the current capabilities of DMSI that way he doesn't have to worry about individuals like yourself complaining about the program not working even if it does everything else. And for the record, those people would NOT be in the wrong.[/quote] As of now, I do not believe Shannon should change the design goal since the purpose of these tests is to see IF the design goal can be accomplished with current technology. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 08-16-2016 (08-16-2016, 09:22 AM)Ricardo Wrote: Chaosvrgn "Ricardo's making the same mistake as a lot of other people -- they want the woman to initiate sex the way a man would. Overtly and aggressively. Women aren't going to initiate sex in the middle of the food court at the mall. " I actually... don't really disagree with what you said here. In your earlier posts, it seemed like you were suggesting that DMSI didn't work at all -- and that's untrue. It works. Very well. Like I said, in my early tests, I saw an attached woman that I've known for years, who NEVER showed any interest in me sexually, go from completely cold to "hey, it's a good idea to cheat on my long-term boyfriend with you." Of course, we were alone and knew we wouldn't be caught, so she was able to act on her urges. That's... the very definition of DMSI working. So, the question is: Why is it working well for me (and others, see RTBoss, Freud and Rayhon) but not others? Is it because I'm good with women? No. I don't think I'm "good" with women. I can't maintain a healthy, intimate relationship with a woman AT ALL. I have a lot of resentment for them and they get on my damn nerves. You know what I am good at, tho? Being crazy in the moment, being dominant, reading body language and using that to relentlessly escalate toward sex. And that was a skill acquired through years of studying and getting rejected -- my [rule 4!], the rejections. I've experienced some of the worst blowouts ever! That makes my use of DMSI much easier, because I'm not afraid of rejection and I honestly don't care what women think of me. For most women, it's a bad idea to be obnoxious toward me -- I'll put you in your place in a heartbeat. Let you know that I really give no sh*ts about how your vagina responds to me. You don't get to place a value on me as a human. Don't do it. Not worth the mental violence I'll inflict after that. But... Took a long amount of time to become bold enough (whether you agree with that approach or not) to do that. Most men just sulk away and diddle themselves that night in a fit of impotent rage. So, Shannon recognizes this, adds the healing modules and STILL gets yelled at. I haven't forgotten Shannon's promises about the sub -- however, we're dealing with new science. A whole new frontier. It could be a YEAR (maybe more) before the target goal is reached. If you bought the sub early on, you were investing in the science, the chance to be an early adopter and directly influence DMSI's development and that's exactly what's happening. Yelling about how it doesn't meet your expectations NOW does nothing for its long-term development. And when the final version comes out, if it doesn't meet my expectations, I promise you: I WILL voice those concerns. But right now, if you want to invest in the success of DMSI, either buy a copy and become a "beta tester / influencer" and submit detailed reports. OR, if you're like, f*ck that jive cuz I ain't spending my cash, contribute to the many "idea threads" we have here to spark creativity and growth. EDIT: In b4 OMG U BROWNOSINZ |