![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-28-2016 That it was later generations doing the simplifying makes sense. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 07-28-2016 Shannon, you're a fan of Star Trek, right? I think what DMSI needs to create (through the user) is a "reality distortion field" ![]() https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality_distortion_field RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - DarthXedonias - 07-28-2016 (07-28-2016, 02:37 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Shannon, you're a fan of Star Trek, right? I think what DMSI needs to create (through the user) is a "reality distortion field" Ya know, I really like that idea if its possible that is lol. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 07-28-2016 (07-28-2016, 02:42 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote:(07-28-2016, 02:37 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Shannon, you're a fan of Star Trek, right? I think what DMSI needs to create (through the user) is a "reality distortion field" Did you read the article? Steve Jobs did it, so did others. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-28-2016 Isn't that what I'm trying to create already? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 07-28-2016 (07-28-2016, 03:43 PM)Shannon Wrote: Isn't that what I'm trying to create already? Oh... I guess so. I just thought you hadn't considered this stuff. Have you studied jobs and his personality? If I was trying to create something like this, ID find everyone who in real life had it then read or watch everything on them and try to duplicate their personality and/or abilities. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-28-2016 (07-28-2016, 03:48 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(07-28-2016, 03:43 PM)Shannon Wrote: Isn't that what I'm trying to create already? In this case, following that path would not work because it doesn't tell me how to replicate the result. In previous experiments with the 6G prototype I determined that there are a lot of intersupporting reasons why people resist. I can work more effectively with direct induction (listening to the subliminal) than indirect ( exposing them to your aura as a result of exposing yourself to the subliminal), but I believe it's just a matter of time before the right parts and procedures are found and put into place. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 07-28-2016 (07-28-2016, 02:37 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Shannon, you're a fan of Star Trek, right? I think what DMSI needs to create (through the user) is a "reality distortion field" "Jobs could also use the RDF to appropriate other's ideas as his own, sometimes proposing an idea to its originator after dismissing it the week before." The CEO of the company I worked for in California used to do this to me all the time. And I mean BLATANTLY. Got to the point where we would incorporate it into our strategy to getting things approved. We called it "Inceptioning" him. We'd present items in a certain manner, knowing he'd reject it, steal it and ask us to do it the following week. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 07-28-2016 (07-28-2016, 05:27 PM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(07-28-2016, 02:37 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Shannon, you're a fan of Star Trek, right? I think what DMSI needs to create (through the user) is a "reality distortion field" Everyone wants to be the hero of the story. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Illumi - 07-28-2016 Lets say that someone on DMSI read the alpha male books recommended in AM6, would the subconcious utilize the info regarding the attraction parts? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - eternity - 07-29-2016 Shannon, I must have dozed off when GPR went from 12 to 14! With that said, I have a friend who's intrigued by subliminals, who suffers from endometriosis pain. I told her that a new technology [gpr14] is bein developed, and that as soon as it's developed i'd let her know so she can get it... the question though, is whether gpr14 would be suitable for endometriosis pain? it's not necessarily "general pain", it's quite specific to her female parts. and when she gets flare ups she's immobilized for a few days :'( RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-29-2016 (07-28-2016, 11:23 PM)Kurohawk Wrote: Lets say that someone on DMSI read the alpha male books recommended in AM6, would the subconcious utilize the info regarding the attraction parts? The subconscious is directed to do what makes you irresistibly sexually attractive. So whatever your definition of that is... It will use what it understands to achieve. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-29-2016 (07-29-2016, 12:19 AM)eternitys_child Wrote: Shannon, I must have dozed off when GPR went from 12 to 14! With that said, I have a friend who's intrigued by subliminals, who suffers from endometriosis pain. I told her that a new technology [gpr14] is bein developed, and that as soon as it's developed i'd let her know so she can get it... GPR14 is a future event. GPR12 is in testing. So far, good reports. GPR10 is known to help with endometriosis pain, so I would expect GPR12 would be very effective for it. Have more private testing to do first. GPR12 may or may not be the next public release. When I say general pain relief, I mean pain relief for as many kinds of pain as possible. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - alphabeta35 - 07-29-2016 (07-28-2016, 05:02 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-28-2016, 03:48 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(07-28-2016, 03:43 PM)Shannon Wrote: Isn't that what I'm trying to create already? hi Shannon, from that article about reality distortion field, having read Jobs' biography, it might actually be Bill Clinton who might be a good model for the aura he exudes. you may have already read it, still, Robert Greene's book Art of Attraction (also has a shortened version) talks about personality types and how and why others are attracted to those personalities/actions. i read most of the archetypes in the book, but it is not until i started the AM6 program that put me in that relaxed mode all the time that i was patient and present enough to see what i am doing in regards to the book, and how people respond. so that book could be a great reference in terms of understanding the mechanisms. it might be a great time for me now to read it again... |