(07-25-2016, 08:07 PM)K-Train Wrote: Hey Shannon since you're here, I remember you saying that one of the aims of DMSI was to get women to repeatedly seek you out for sex. If its not too personal, has your GF become more of an initiator or is she merely enjoying the experience (sex) more? Thanks in advance and feel free not to answer if its too personal.

(07-25-2016, 08:12 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Hey Shannon,l more in line with DMSI: you said the goal was to get women to initiate and (correct me if I'm wrong) take the male role.

Does this mean we will not attract very feminine women while on DMSI?

Quote:

(07-25-2016, 07:16 PM)bristo Wrote: You seem to be just using ad hominem attacks instead of explaining the full story.

As someone who spend a lot of time and money studying linguistics, rhetoric and logic, I must inform you that you're using that term incorrectly.

Quote:

(07-25-2016, 07:16 PM)bristo Wrote: You never mentioned anything about your child in all this talk about how the system did you wrong, you just complained about your finances. (You have the right obviously). But you can understand how some of us can assume that you not getting custody didn't bother you.

My child is none of your business. The conversation at hand was corruption in the child support system and Banksy's claim that child support was "hard for mothers to get" and not a big deal. Thus, my main arguments were targeted at destroying that myth. Anything outside of that myth (including information about my child) was beyond the scope of the discussion and again, is none of your business.

(07-25-2016, 08:24 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-25-2016, 08:12 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Hey Shannon,l more in line with DMSI: you said the goal was to get women to initiate and (correct me if I'm wrong) take the male role.

Does this mean we will not attract very feminine women while on DMSI?

No, you can attract women of all levels of femininity. The more she is acting out of her feminine side, the less she will actually initiate directly, as the program is urging her to do. But she will definitely make her interest known, if you're not clueless. And when we get this baby going, hopefully we can get all levels of femininity to initiate directly. Just in proportionately feminine ways.

(07-25-2016, 08:54 PM)Big Boss Wrote: Shannon, is your gf a redhead? And just curious, how did u two meet?

(07-25-2016, 08:56 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-25-2016, 08:54 PM)Big Boss Wrote: Shannon, is your gf a redhead? And just curious, how did u two meet?

Sadly, no. She does carry the redhead gene, though, and has freckles, as I do. But she is a brunette.

We met, believe it or not, on POF. But I had some "special guidance" to know when to do and what to do to make this happen.

(07-25-2016, 08:57 PM)Noctis Wrote:

(07-25-2016, 08:56 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-25-2016, 08:54 PM)Big Boss Wrote: Shannon, is your gf a redhead? And just curious, how did u two meet?

Sadly, no. She does carry the redhead gene, though, and has freckles, as I do. But she is a brunette.

We met, believe it or not, on POF. But I had some "special guidance" to know when to do and what to do to make this happen.

Was the special guidance subliminals?

(07-25-2016, 08:56 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-25-2016, 08:54 PM)Big Boss Wrote: Shannon, is your gf a redhead? And just curious, how did u two meet?

Sadly, no. She does carry the redhead gene, though, and has freckles, as I do. But she is a brunette.

We met, believe it or not, on POF. But I had some "special guidance" to know when to do and what to do to make this happen.

(07-25-2016, 09:14 PM)bristo Wrote:

(07-25-2016, 08:56 PM)Shannon Wrote:

(07-25-2016, 08:54 PM)Big Boss Wrote: Shannon, is your gf a redhead? And just curious, how did u two meet?

Sadly, no. She does carry the redhead gene, though, and has freckles, as I do. But she is a brunette.

We met, believe it or not, on POF. But I had some "special guidance" to know when to do and what to do to make this happen.

Do these "special methods" have anything to do with astrology?

(07-25-2016, 10:25 PM)CatMan Wrote: Hi Shannon,

I'm not sure if this was addressed already. I remember when you recently said that you accidentally forgot to test a batch of ASRB combinations, and were going to do that to see if a new ASRB combination was superior to the current one in 2.2. I wanted to mention it to see if that was done or not, in case a better solution for performance can be found.