![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-29-2018 (10-28-2018, 04:11 PM)Jake2015 Wrote: @Shannon Get back on it, and at the end of three months we'll assess whether or not you want a refund. Under normal circunstances, this would have invalidated you, but there are a couple of factors in play that make this a special case, so I'm willing to be flexible in this specific case. Quote:I am up for jumping on DMSI 3.3 but you said FRM v3 will be included in UMOP so after the full 90 days I can then decide on how to move next based on what subs are available. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-29-2018 (10-28-2018, 05:26 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: @Shannon I'm glad I could help in some way with my reporting on that. There was something I wanted to ask you regarding This: The specific metrics that are being considered by a woman will not always include all 130+ of the metrics I have found. Most of them are universal, some are not. Likewise, they are not the same number or type that straight men have, and may not be the same for gay men, gay women, bisexuals, etc. So to make them effective, we need to set up the program to act on only those metrics that are effective, for each specific case. So if you're a straight man running DMSI and trying to attract a straight woman, there will be a different set of metrics than if you were looking to attract a bisexual woman. Likewise, each woman has her own unique subset of metrics, and each metric has a unique set of configurations necessary for each woman. So DMSI is seeking to trigger exactly the right metrics and configure them exactly the right way, no matter who you are as the user, and no matter who they are as the affected, as long as they meet the criteria that you are attracted to sexually. This specific module would not be included in LTU, because it is too specific in focus. It wouldn't make sense. What you are referring to is covered by OE and other things in LTU. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - THolt - 10-29-2018 @Shannon I know you have been working on DSMI full blast but have there been any new developments about what will go into LTU 5.5G? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Broski - 10-29-2018 US/LM 2 Update- Day 19(Start of 3rd cycle of 6 days) So had a brief time frame this weekend when I was out and I felt pretty awesome! Was flowing in the moment, witty as ever, and feeling more relaxed then normal. This only lasted around an hour or so though. The rest of the time lately has mostly been spent frustrated and stuck in my head. Haven't noticed any "lucky" things happen to me as of yet. Success based thinking is also definitely not there yet. Been feeling kind of down and demotivated. Sleep has been pretty trash lately. Maybe FRM2 is still working on things and just bringing some stuff up while it processes it. Will continue going forward with the program and report back later with any new findings and updates. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Broski - 10-29-2018 Hey Shannon, Also had a question if you don't mind... If one of ones goals is to expand their consciousness/awareness/being more present, more in touch with truth(whatever you want to refer to it as) can US/LM2 help with that? I know that obviously US/LM is designed to help achieve whatever your goals may be in life, but the reason I ask is because expanding ones consciousnesses is such a unique thing, and ultimately involves transcending the mind at higher levels RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Dilectione - 10-29-2018 Shannon, if possible, please make dmsi 3.3 run on as minimal loops as possible. I love uslm1 because only with one loop, the result are amazing, uslm2 I believe is stronger than v1, but me personally can't stand the loops if it is a must doing it back to back (if we could divide the loops there and there of course that could be very neat). Thanks a bunch Shannon, will always support ya! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Broski - 10-29-2018 (10-29-2018, 05:28 PM)Dilectione Wrote: Shannon, if possible, please make dmsi 3.3 run on as minimal loops as possible. I love uslm1 because only with one loop, the result are amazing, uslm2 I believe is stronger than v1, but me personally can't stand the loops if it is a must doing it back to back (if we could divide the loops there and there of course that could be very neat). Thanks a bunch Shannon, will always support ya! I don't think he "makes" any of the subs run on a particular number of loops. I think he just runs the models on what amount of loops will be most effective, then prescribes whatever number they tell him will work best. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Dilectione - 10-29-2018 (10-29-2018, 05:35 PM)Broski Wrote:(10-29-2018, 05:28 PM)Dilectione Wrote: Shannon, if possible, please make dmsi 3.3 run on as minimal loops as possible. I love uslm1 because only with one loop, the result are amazing, uslm2 I believe is stronger than v1, but me personally can't stand the loops if it is a must doing it back to back (if we could divide the loops there and there of course that could be very neat). Thanks a bunch Shannon, will always support ya! True, that's why I said if possible, I prefer subs with as minimum usage as possible, because in my experience, Shannon subs are very good that brain need time to processing and executing it, and now it's 5.5G, I believe it's way more 'transcoded' than 5G and brain need more time to rest and adjust accordingly. Still, if possible, 1 loop dmsi gonna be popular ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - san_hal - 10-29-2018 Shannon mentioned somewhere that sequentially all subs will be 1 loop RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-30-2018 (10-29-2018, 09:46 AM)THolt Wrote: @Shannon I know you have been working on DSMI full blast but have there been any new developments about what will go into LTU 5.5G? No. All focus is on DMSI 3.3 and/or advancing the skeleton script. I am pretty sure what is already set for inclusion will be at or even a little beyond the limit of what I can add. We shall see when the time comes that I can continue working on it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-30-2018 (10-29-2018, 01:47 PM)Broski Wrote: Hey Shannon, USLM1 and 2 are both designed to take as your conscious goals the direction of and for the program and the focus of its efforts to make you successful. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-30-2018 (10-29-2018, 05:28 PM)Dilectione Wrote: Shannon, if possible, please make dmsi 3.3 run on as minimal loops as possible. I love uslm1 because only with one loop, the result are amazing, uslm2 I believe is stronger than v1, but me personally can't stand the loops if it is a must doing it back to back (if we could divide the loops there and there of course that could be very neat). Thanks a bunch Shannon, will always support ya! I am doing what I can, but my level of skill and knowledge at this time is going to limit me to whatever is possible according to that. We shall see what the necessary loops are after I have created it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - findingme - 10-30-2018 Does USLM have scripting for an aura? I've been wondering that since one may project themselves as successful, but I'm unsure if this is from one's changing beliefs or something else entirely. I don't understand how subliminals manifest auras, to be honest. I also ask since the 4G US script has these messages in it, which may (?) produce an aura: My body language now says I am ultra-successful. I now act like I am ultra-successful, and I automatically become ultra-successful. I looked in the glossary and found nothing on it, and the FAQ section mentioned auras, but assumed understanding of them. Explanations weren't given. I'll take correction if I missed it. I know they are an energy projected, but I'm not understanding how subs create them. Is it scripting or energy sourcing? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - MasterEnki - 10-30-2018 (10-30-2018, 01:03 PM)findingme Wrote: Does USLM have scripting for an aura? According to the script library for DAOS 4G, “I now develop and project an extremely intense, powerful, obvious and effective aura of sexiness” It seems this is the kind of statement / suggestion that programs the subconscious mind to generate an aura. I’ve read that deeply held beliefs also affect the aura / personal energies that one has within and around one’s physical body. It would be interesting to get a Shannon perspective on this subject / question. |