![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 11:33 PM)dissonance Wrote: Also, to clarify, is the DMSI v2.1 designed to attract everyone of the opposite sex maximally, or scale to how sexually attractive you find the person to be? I remember for the poll, people voted for the maximal effect upon everyone of the opposite sex, but for the description in the product page, it sounds like it's the other option? ("sexually irresistible to people of the gender(s) you find sexually attractive, who you are personally sexually attracted to."). It is full power all the time - for those who are specified within the goal phrasing. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 11:35 PM)Hercules Wrote:(07-09-2016, 11:22 PM)dissonance Wrote:(07-09-2016, 09:54 PM)Shannon Wrote: Chaos, much respect. Damaging my lungs was how I was forced in the direction of subliminals. It was a "gift" that way. My badge of honor at having passed the test that it originated from. The scripting for anger in E2 is much more advanced, and is designed to transform the anger into it's revers, and wisdom, and unconditional love. It is also designed to get you to forgive those you're angry with, such that you are no longer self destructing through anger they are not being affected by anyway. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - eternity - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 09:54 PM)Shannon Wrote: Chaos, much respect. i too would like to know about this master class training, and why such a training was so dark in its core. It doesn't add up to me. but thank you Shannon, for being transparent about your past on this issue. It gives me a greater understanding and greater sense of empathy for why you do what you do, the way you do it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-10-2016 (07-09-2016, 11:52 PM)eternitys_child Wrote:(07-09-2016, 09:54 PM)Shannon Wrote: Chaos, much respect. The more dangerous the knowledge, the more care is required in making sure that only those who would use it wisely and for the good of all have access to it. At the highest levels of mastery in some such subjects, the testing is all or nothing: you live if you pass, and you remove the threat you pose by dying if you fail. Even those who pass are usually scarred physically and emotionally in some way or ways as a result of the extreme challenge these tests present. I was relatively lucky among those who I can consider equals for having passed similar tests; I only suffered scarred lungs and incredible anger and hurt emotionally. There are those having passed these tests who have suffered far worse fates than I. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-10-2016 Still being very surprised at what's passing the modeling runs for the goal phrasing in V2.2. Some really interesting stuff here. I wish I could share it with you. Instead, I'll just have to tease you with posts like this, instead. BWA-hahahaha! ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 07-10-2016 Wait what kind of testing is it for? A martial art? Or is that the part that you're saying you are not at liberty to tell? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Natious - 07-10-2016 Shannon the trained spy. Now with a masters. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-10-2016 (07-10-2016, 12:29 AM)dissonance Wrote: Wait what kind of testing is it for? A martial art? Or is that the part that you're saying you are not at liberty to tell? I am not at liberty to say. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-10-2016 (07-10-2016, 12:32 AM)Natious Wrote: Shannon the trained spy. Now with a masters. LOL! I would die very quickly as a spy. Sorry. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 07-10-2016 (07-10-2016, 12:32 AM)Shannon Wrote:(07-10-2016, 12:29 AM)dissonance Wrote: Wait what kind of testing is it for? A martial art? Or is that the part that you're saying you are not at liberty to tell? oooh okay got it RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JackOfHearts - 07-10-2016 (07-10-2016, 12:26 AM)Shannon Wrote: Still being very surprised at what's passing the modeling runs for the goal phrasing in V2.2. Some really interesting stuff here. I wish I could share it with you. Instead, I'll just have to tease you with posts like this, instead. BWA-hahahaha! Write a book about it ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - lokko - 07-10-2016 Is it me or is anyone else constantly checking these threads for breakthroughs in sub creation lol RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-10-2016 (07-10-2016, 12:37 AM)ALI6NMENT Wrote: Shannon, you remind me of a cross breed between Yoda and Deadpool I haven't watched anything to do with Deadpool, so I don't know what that references. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shawn - 07-10-2016 (07-10-2016, 12:32 AM)Shannon Wrote:(07-10-2016, 12:29 AM)dissonance Wrote: Wait what kind of testing is it for? A martial art? Or is that the part that you're saying you are not at liberty to tell? You are really good at teasing us, not only with sub technology ![]() |