![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 06:14 AM)terry44 Wrote: Not sure real experiences can be 'stupid ass'. I was commenting on the superficiality of women, not getting angry about anyone stealing white women. And as I said, the black men I was talking about were friends. There wasn't resentment, just observation, over and over and over again. Oh and it wasn't their pickup ability or personality, the women made a beeline for them without them doing anything. Oh yes, "real experiences" can MOST DEFINITELY be stupid-ass. You claim that you'd go to the club with your black friends, and the women would make a beeline straight for them because they're black. While that MAY be a true story, what's "stupid-ass" is the assumption that they went for your friends because of their race, all other considerations notwithstanding. Women tend to go for the highest value, highest status male in a group, PERIOD. If your argument is that society perceives black men as "higher status" than white men, I've got a bridge to sell you. And since women don't NATURALLY approach (women are selectors, men compete for their attention), it's much more likely that your black friends were also: * In better shape * Taller * Better dressed * Better groomed * Better at seduction (pro-tip: polarize the situation quickly, trying to be a "friend" puts you in the friendzone, regardless of the nonsense that women will tell you -- just look at what Shannon was saying a few threads ago about their cognitive dissonance) And what's pissing you off about this situation, what's making you resentful is this: You thought your +5 white man bonus would elevate you above your black friends, and when it didn't, your ego and your feelz got hurt, leading you to resent black people. And THAT'S what makes your "real experiences" stupid ass. It ain't the fact that it happened. It's your interpretation and subsequent response. Instead of lifting yourself up to the best that you can be, you blame an outside force beyond your control (and of all things to choose, "man, if i were black, my life would be better"). That's some serious mental gymnastics. I don't think you'd be able to handle life as a black man in America, holmes. Like seriously, this is some Eliot Rodgers kinda mess. I think E2 to clear out faulty emotional beliefs and AM6 to make you feel like a high status man would help. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RisingSon - 07-09-2016 Western white women have been conditioned by the media for YEARS to see white men as effeminate/weak and black men as strong/dominant. Same thing is going on in Europe with the refugee situation. Like the late great Patrice O'Neal has comically stated, you are just her FOOD and she is playing with you. Here's a bonus vid on how the black community was destabilized first as an experiment (starts at about 5:00 min): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=15iuq9OTTsE RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 07-09-2016 Is it ok to listen to the 5 loops not consecutively, but rather spread out in the day? Like 2 loops here, 2 loops a few hours later, 1 loop later? I'm one of those that don't like listening to subs while sleeping. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dilettante - 07-09-2016 I am a hispanic-looking shorter asian man but I can relate to terry's and catman's dilemma. I don't get a lot of attention either. so yeah I don't have my +5 bonus either but I'm just as disadvantaged as white men in the dating game. women like confidence and black men have self confidence whereas I willingly admit have doubts about myself. women in the west tend to be very self assured and confident this seeking a mate that supercedes her confidence. it's also a pattern I've observed over and over, that black men, who are self confident (willing to approach hard and risk rejection) tend to go home with women from the club/bar/whatever at the end of the night. whereas my charming but demurred self goes home alone. It's definitely frustrating when women seem to choose the same type of guys over and over. will you be discounting my experiences as stupid ass too? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - dissonance - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 06:58 AM)Dilettante Wrote: I am a hispanic-looking shorter asian man but I can relate to terry's and catman's dilemma. I don't get a lot of attention either. so yeah I don't have my +5 bonus either but I'm just as disadvantaged as white men in the dating game. it also largely depends on the area, and the city, or crowd even... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - eternity - 07-09-2016 I know first hand that being Indian gave me a disadvantage.... BECAUSE I ALLOWED IT TO affect my reality. It used to be a major hang up of mine, until I ran sm3, then E2. Now I don't suffer from that self limiting belief anymore. TheRealJustin and I had a back and forth discussion on my sm3 journal, and it really put things into perspective. If you have enough of what she's looking for, the race factor won't play as strongly as you think. And chaosvrgn, I know you make your judgment based on data from okcupid, but I don't think the way a woman thinks on a dating site is congruent with the way she thinks in a 1 on 1 interaction with a new guy she just met. She HAS to make a selection, based on pre set parameters, in order to access the site and see her options. So the site gave her a bias before she even started browsing. In reality, If he plays his cards right with her, she'll go home with him. I doubt in the heat of the moment she will say "OH SHIT HE'S INDIAN" or "OH SHIT HE'S BLACK" and then realize she is really racist on the inside and cut the interaction short. I never pictured myself dating a black girl but one time the opportunity presented itself during my sm3 run, and I thought to myself "hey let's see where this goes". It's not so black and white, to make a punny. Interaction can be dynamic, and race is only a small part of it, but it won't be an issue if you don't allow it to be. I was thoroughly surprised to find out through the grape vine the variety of races that had the hots for me during my sm3 run... various white women, a Puerto rican, 2 black girls, (1 hood and 1 Nigerian), mixed white and black..... that almost ENTIRELY squashed my preconceived notion that being Indian was a handicap. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 06:58 AM)Dilettante Wrote: I am a hispanic-looking shorter asian man but I can relate to terry's and catman's dilemma. I don't get a lot of attention either. so yeah I don't have my +5 bonus either but I'm just as disadvantaged as white men in the dating game. You recognize that there's other elements in play, such as self-confidence. You openly admitted that you lack confidence and it prevents you from approaching women with the same level of boldness as your black peers. Dating is a high-risk (arguably) high-reward process. If you can't handle rejection, you won't succeed. As men, we're molded in the flames of rejection. We're mentally and physically built to withstand rejection and failure. Women couldn't handle the sheer amount of day-to-day rejection that we experience as men. See the difference? Terry said that his black friends "weren't any better at pickup and didn't have better personalities," insinuating that race was the ONLY difference between them. While it may be frustrating, at least you're recognizing that there IS something you can work on and that's what turns the situation into a moment of mental and spiritual alchemy, rather than "why all da white wimmenz with da black menz." But, I'll make myself clear: Screaming, "omg, you're discounting my experiences," means little to nothing to me because we're talking two different languages. I don't believe that every opinion is equal, I don't believe that every opinion has value, nor do I feel like I should respect everyone's opinion on virtue of "reasons". ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 06:35 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(07-09-2016, 06:14 AM)terry44 Wrote: Not sure real experiences can be 'stupid ass'. I was commenting on the superficiality of women, not getting angry about anyone stealing white women. And as I said, the black men I was talking about were friends. There wasn't resentment, just observation, over and over and over again. Oh and it wasn't their pickup ability or personality, the women made a beeline for them without them doing anything. Oh dear, you really do make a lot of 'stupid ass' assumptions. You know nothing about me or my experiences, or what my black friends looked like (not taller than me, or any better dressed, or into PUA - this was in the 90s) but think you know more about me and my friends than I do. For stupid ass arrogance that really takes some beating. I see absolutely no need to continue such a stupid conversation. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - 4Kingdoms - 07-09-2016 Poll: Would you pay extra for Soft/Medium/Hard?? http://subliminal-talk.com/thread-7701.html RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dilettante - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 07:40 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote: But, I'll make myself clear: Screaming, "omg, you're discounting my experiences," means little to nothing to me because we're talking two different languages. I don't believe that every opinion is equal, I don't believe that every opinion has value, nor do I feel like I should respect everyone's opinion on virtue of "reasons". so that's a yes, you will discount everyone's experience and yours is the realest experience. Thanks for proving your arrogance. Goodbye. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 07:37 AM)eternitys_child Wrote: If you have enough of what she's looking for, the race factor won't play as strongly as you think. The book I cited, Dataclysm, goes into exactly what you're talking about. It focuses on the incongruities between what people say on their profiles, and how they actually act. For example, women saying they don't care about race, but only messaging members of their own race. Or, the most enlightening of the dating related extractions (there's a dope ass section on how Twitter is affecting language), he points out that when rating people on a scale of 1-10, men tend to rate women very fairly, resulting in a perfect bell curve. Women, however, rate men as either a 1 or a 10 with absolutely nothing in-between. According to his data (which has been verified as mathematically and statistically sound), the majority of women believe that 80% of men aren't good enough for her (there's that Pareto principle again) and yet, she STILL messages them. There's a lot more at play here. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 07:42 AM)terry44 Wrote: Oh dear, you really do make a lot of 'stupid ass' assumptions. You know nothing about me or my experiences, or what my black friends looked like (not taller than me, or any better dressed, or into PUA - this was in the 90s) but think you know more about me and my friends than I do. For stupid ass arrogance that really takes some beating. I see absolutely no need to continue such a stupid conversation. (07-09-2016, 07:50 AM)Dilettante Wrote: so that's a yes, you will discount everyone's experience and yours is the realest experience. Thanks for proving your arrogance. Goodbye. Used to respect and "consider" everyone's opinions even when they were clearly illogical and riddled with inconsistencies: Ended up losing everything I owned and went bankrupt. Started taking people to task for saying things that made no sense, stopped making excuses and forged my own way through life: Became a successful entrepreneur in six months, making 2-3k/week. ![]() ** Goes back to "stealing" white women with DA POWER OF irresistible blackness. ** https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGQ-ISsDm8M RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - JJ54 - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 06:58 AM)Dilettante Wrote: I am a hispanic-looking shorter asian man but I can relate to terry's and catman's dilemma. I don't get a lot of attention either. so yeah I don't have my +5 bonus either but I'm just as disadvantaged as white men in the dating game. What chaosvrgn is trying to say that it is all in your beliefs. If you think you don't have the confidence to get women, then guess what, you will never get the women that you desire. You set the tone of your reality, the women and the outside world only verifies it to you. That's why beliefs are important for the subconscious mind. Because what you believe is what your subconscious will verify to you. I'll use myself as an example. I'm a black man myself, and I have a preference for Asian women. Am I their first choice most of the time? No, because they will usually go for white men before they go for black men. Now I can easily create a belief in my mind that "Asian women only like white men." However, that's not my belief. My belief is "Asian women love black men." And wouldn't you know it, I'm now attracting Asian women into my life. So no, I'm not discounting your belief as stupid. But I will say that you need to change your belief that you're not self-confident. If you know women are attracted to you, then you will have no problem attracting the women you want. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dilettante - 07-09-2016 For the record, we were arguing about superficiality. Second, I find that my charming but demurred nature works overseas and I've had more attraction and dates outside of the anglosphere. I am merely reporting my observations and concurring with others. The issue was not self confidence, the issue was superficiality. but it was reinterpreted as something else which I will not go retreading over. but I appreciate the advise. thank you. |