Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - lokko - 07-08-2016 What is this word "models" all about. I keep seeing Shannon talk about it. Testing models etc but not sure what it really is. Is it the people he's testing the subs on or certain scripts he's working on...Shannon? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-08-2016 (07-08-2016, 10:40 PM)lokko Wrote: What is this word "models" all about. I keep seeing Shannon talk about it. Testing models etc but not sure what it really is. Is it the people he's testing the subs on or certain scripts he's working on...Shannon? Predictive models. Something like computer models meteorologists use to predict the weather, only I can use mine to predict a number of other things. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - kenpachi - 07-08-2016 That's good Shannon's talking about different versions to attract different women... it shows he knows you can't throw "women" into one group and have them all react the same. However, I think he's got it right to only release one version. I don't want to be running the program and stressing over which version I should be running to attract which woman. Let's keep it simple. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Hold007 - 07-09-2016 (07-08-2016, 05:50 PM)Shannon Wrote: GPR12, MHS... then I'll sort out what to do next. can somebody in this thread please tell me what GPR12 and MHS stands for?? thanks RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 07-09-2016 (07-08-2016, 09:21 PM)CatMan Wrote:(07-08-2016, 08:57 PM)RisingSon Wrote:(07-08-2016, 08:46 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(07-08-2016, 08:00 PM)RisingSon Wrote: The models are going absolutely savage. Yes, they call men superficial and yet are incredibly impressed by height. And when I was younger and used to go clubbing with a group of people I knew, my black friends did so much better than my white or Asian friends. I mean women used to literally chat them up, but look right through the rest of us. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - CatMan - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 03:57 AM)terry44 Wrote:(07-08-2016, 09:21 PM)CatMan Wrote:(07-08-2016, 08:57 PM)RisingSon Wrote:(07-08-2016, 08:46 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(07-08-2016, 08:00 PM)RisingSon Wrote: The models are going absolutely savage. I can vouch for that. I've been out of style apparently my whole life, and have gone through the EXACT experience you listed, all through high school, college, club scene, you name it. Yep. Infuriating to me, and led to many beliefs and anger and jealousy, over my life towards "them", I'll admit. Not going further than that, as I don't want any forum rules broken. Looking forward to MSI 2.2 leveling the playing field a bit, finally. I've been passed over long enough. I'm going to stick with E2, at least until 2.2 debuts. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Daredevil - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 04:02 AM)CatMan Wrote:(07-09-2016, 03:57 AM)terry44 Wrote:(07-08-2016, 09:21 PM)CatMan Wrote:(07-08-2016, 08:57 PM)RisingSon Wrote:(07-08-2016, 08:46 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Can you clarify what you mean by this? We've been lied too our whole entire lives to think that women love nice boys like prince charming and we want to raise them to our level and help them but they despise us for that deep down and what they want is danger and play because out of them are bored. But one thing I can't understand is why the most common female fantasy is rape and the majority of female watch hardcore(torture/bondage) porn. Shannon can you shine a little light on this. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Gotcha - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 04:36 AM)ALI6NMENT Wrote: Girls fantasizing about being raped, girls watching hardcore torture/bondage porn...if them girls right there don't have "issues" I don't know what "issues" are any more. Fantasies are just that... Fantasies. I've had a few girls/women tell me about that kind of fantasy, and others that may seem even "worse" to you. When they know you won't judge, women tend to share those thoughs. I'm quite sure none would like it to happen in reality. I would not say they have "issues" at all. They just get turned on by thinking about it. No need to make a big deal about it, in my opinion. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - chaosvrgn - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 04:02 AM)CatMan Wrote:(07-09-2016, 03:57 AM)terry44 Wrote: Yes, they call men superficial and yet are incredibly impressed by height. And when I was younger and used to go clubbing with a group of people I knew, my black friends did so much better than my white or Asian friends. I mean women used to literally chat them up, but look right through the rest of us. Awwwwwwww! This is cute. As a black man who grew up in the American south, I want to reassure my pink-skinned brethren that, even if black men were stealing up all da wimmenz, you have the advantage on, well... every-f*cking-thing else. You know, including not getting shot the f*ck up at routine traffic stops. Turn on the news, see the turmoil this country's in right now and enjoy a moment of relief. While you may not be able to attract a couple of club rats, you don't have to worry about your life literally or metaphorically being destroyed by virtue of your skin color. Ya'll some f*cking clowns sometimes. Really, you need MSI 2.2 to finally get an edge up on the black men stealing all the white women? What kind of ridiculous excuse is that? Let me give you a hint: try online dating. White men get a +3 bonus for simply being white. No, don't argue. I've already done all the research. OkCupid has already done all the research. Christian Rudder (founder of OkCupid and a genius mathematician / statistician) wrote a book called Dataclysm: Who We Are (When We Think No One is Looking) that discussed the "weird" (but painfully obvious to Black America) oddities he found in OkCupid's data. He noted that while white women claim no racial bias on their profiles and in the questions they have to answer, they show a CLEAR bias for white men. EDIT: P.S. -- black women preferred white men too. One of their number one searches was "outside my race," looking for white men that openly stated that on their profiles. So, rest assured my furry friend, and anyone else holding these stupid-ass views: the black men ain't stealing up your women. The problem is your faulty ass beliefs that you refuse to acknowledge, even when you have the most powerful subliminals in the world floating around in your head. I'm going out on Wednesday with a quite attractive, quite successful brunette that runs a local non-profit. So, even with the statistically proven "disadvantage" of being black, I'm still managing to pull quality women. Then again, in ya'lls head, I "stole" her, right? Because you clearly deserve her more on virtue of being white? That's where your dissonance and anger's coming from. Fix that sh*t. Quit making excuses. Go out, stop trying to be "friends" with a woman and make it clear you wanna be her lover. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RisingSon - 07-09-2016 Here we go with the whole sanitizing things as fantasy rationalization. I'd kindly say that two types of women are more honest than the rest: hookers and romance novel writers. Ravishment... Rapture.... And if you can't fulfill a certain woman's fantasies she will just find someone else who can or forever live a quite life of desperation and become hysterical. For women this "R" paradox is about being such an absolutely irresistible object of desire that a strong, dominant, and high-value man simply cannot control himself or resist her charms further and takes her RIGHT THERE. Of course, there could be more to it than that when we get into bondage, etc.. The dark side of female sexuality. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - terry44 - 07-09-2016 (07-09-2016, 05:56 AM)chaosvrgn Wrote:(07-09-2016, 04:02 AM)CatMan Wrote:(07-09-2016, 03:57 AM)terry44 Wrote: Yes, they call men superficial and yet are incredibly impressed by height. And when I was younger and used to go clubbing with a group of people I knew, my black friends did so much better than my white or Asian friends. I mean women used to literally chat them up, but look right through the rest of us. Not sure real experiences can be 'stupid ass'. I was commenting on the superficiality of women, not getting angry about anyone stealing white women. And as I said, the black men I was talking about were friends. There wasn't resentment, just observation, over and over and over again. Oh and it wasn't their pickup ability or personality, the women made a beeline for them without them doing anything. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - kenpachi - 07-09-2016 Check out a book called my secret garden by nancy friday, alighnment. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Dilettante - 07-09-2016 I know this is too late but: I really love soft women. Most of my dates and women friends are softies (and maybe I as well lol) I've met many women from countries outside the west and they are mostly soft and medium. Western women tend to scale medium to hard in my opinion. that said, I'm trusting Shannon. The goal is to produce sexual attraction through our auras and those responding (which should be a wide range of women) should initiate some sort of response (meeting us halfway in the mating dance) RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Vincent_Vega - 07-09-2016 (07-08-2016, 06:21 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-08-2016, 05:54 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(07-08-2016, 05:50 PM)Shannon Wrote: Having a hard time narrowing the goal scripting down below three options. At the moment, DMSI is in testing phase, so the users won't get a refund anyway. Why not offering all three to the guys who are already testing v2.1? That way, you will get test reports on all three versions and maybe you can then tweak the whole thing to only have one or two final versions at the end. But yea, nevertheless, one single option would be the easiest for all. |