Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-08-2016 GPR12, MHS... then I'll sort out what to do next. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-08-2016 Having a hard time narrowing the goal scripting down below three options. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 07-08-2016 (07-08-2016, 05:50 PM)Shannon Wrote: Having a hard time narrowing the goal scripting down below three options. Naive question inbound: Can't you just try each of them? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-08-2016 (07-08-2016, 05:54 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(07-08-2016, 05:50 PM)Shannon Wrote: Having a hard time narrowing the goal scripting down below three options. Well, that is an option... I could build all three, and it would cost me at least 72 hours of work to do so. Then I would have three valid products to offer: "Soft", "Medium" and "Hard". (Referring to the women who would respond to each.) Then I could make them all available in the store, and give a description of what each is good for. Then you could choose for yourself. But, this would inevitably lead to someone trying to take advantage of the refund policy by trying to "return" one and get another, or "trade in". Not good. The options I have in response to that are, offer no refund at all, or make it a bundle pack, at triple the cost. If I offer no refund, then I lose a lot of sales. If I do the triple pack, then someone's going to use it wrong, screw up their results and then ask for a refund. So... I think I'll pass. You guys will get the single option that works best overall. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 07-08-2016 (07-08-2016, 06:21 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-08-2016, 05:54 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(07-08-2016, 05:50 PM)Shannon Wrote: Having a hard time narrowing the goal scripting down below three options. Can you describe the different types of women that would respond to each? If you don't offer all 3 options in the final version, will it at least affect each type of woman? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jones - 07-08-2016 (07-08-2016, 05:02 PM)Shannon Wrote: "Soft", "Medium" and "Hard". (Referring to the women who would respond to each.) Can you expound on this? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-08-2016 (07-08-2016, 06:35 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(07-08-2016, 06:21 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-08-2016, 05:54 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(07-08-2016, 05:50 PM)Shannon Wrote: Having a hard time narrowing the goal scripting down below three options. There are a lot of different types of women I am testing this against, for the guys, and men for the ladies. The women in particular who respond to Option 1 are generally "Soft" in that they are innocent, gentle, nice, normal, kind, sweet, etc. Generally skittish and relatively inexperienced. About 40% of virgins fall here. "Medium" is women who are between soft and hard in terms of how they want to be treated. Surprisingly, most strippers in their teens and 20's fall here instead of "hard", while most teenage girls who are not strippers fall into "hard". In fact, unsurprisingly, it seems most women fall here (in medium). Most bartendresses, most waitresses, some teenage girls, most randomly encountered "bored housewives", most women you would encounter at the beach, and about 40% of virgins. This is the option leading the pack so far for successful responses for women. Then you have your "hard" types, who tend to want extreme treatment from men, and this includes (surprisingly) most teenage girls, porn stars, some randomly encountered "bored housewives" you might meet while shopping, most nude models for A/V modeling, bikini models, some women you would encounter at the beach, some teenage strippers, and some bartendresses. About 20% of virgins, and the ones who are most likely to become pregnant during defloration. All three will be affected by each option, but each option peaks for the types mentioned as being "most X". RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 07-08-2016 I vote hard. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - maxx55 - 07-08-2016 (07-08-2016, 06:54 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-08-2016, 06:35 PM)maxx55 Wrote:(07-08-2016, 06:21 PM)Shannon Wrote:(07-08-2016, 05:54 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(07-08-2016, 05:50 PM)Shannon Wrote: Having a hard time narrowing the goal scripting down below three options. Hard sounds exciting, but soft sounds nice too. I personally want to try both! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-08-2016 If there was a vote being taken, that might be worth something. I have to go with whatever produces the peak of the bell curve, though. That is what pleases the most possible customers. Although I am seriously tempted to build Medium and Hard. But we have a while yet to go on modeling before I know which one definitively produces the peak of the bell curve. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Steven - 07-08-2016 Shannon, What is meant by "extreme treatment from men"? I'm guessing that doesn't mean getting 100 roses and 20 boxes of chocolates. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Breeze - 07-08-2016 (07-08-2016, 07:50 PM)Steven Wrote: Shannon, It possibly means 100 spanks and 20... hmm, you fill in the blank. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 07-08-2016 (07-08-2016, 07:50 PM)Steven Wrote: Shannon, It means: treat her like shit and she'll love you for it. My favorite kind of girl (haven't seen many of these in recent years. These are the kinds I naturally attract though I'm wondering if AM 6 is making me too "soft"). RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - RisingSon - 07-08-2016 The models are going absolutely savage. I, too, feel like my problem has been being too soft as of late. I also wonder how much is nature vs nurture. Fascinating data which reconfirms my own. |