![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jake2015 - 07-05-2016 (07-05-2016, 12:22 AM)heavysm Wrote: [Observation of EPRHA 2.0 usage] Nothing as yet, approaching my 32days soon and so far no difference or change or results :/ not sure what I'm doing wrong so all are welcome to read my journal including Shannon. Maybe you all can spot what I'm doing that I'm not able to. thanks RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-05-2016 (07-05-2016, 09:43 AM)Natious Wrote:(07-05-2016, 01:53 AM)LionKing Wrote:(07-05-2016, 12:22 AM)heavysm Wrote: [Observation of EPRHA 2.0 usage] Waking up and falling asleep is when the conscious and subconscious are at balance, and so communicate most easily between themselves. Depression is, as far as I can see, usually caused by subconsciously feeling hopeless and/or angry. It is very likely that E2 is pushing you to deal with a fear you're trying hard to avoid, but can't. That could result in depression. When you consciously notice a change and then the next day it's not true, what has happened is that you consciously changed back to what was previously, usually because the change scares you. Sometimes, changes need to be taken in baby steps, and occasionally, they need to be taken two steps forward, one step back. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-05-2016 (07-05-2016, 09:53 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:(07-05-2016, 12:22 AM)heavysm Wrote: [Observation of EPRHA 2.0 usage] I think it's most likely that you are either resisting the program, or you are unable to see or sense what it's doing. If you stop using the program for a week, and suddenly feel emotional pain or somesuch 1-3 days after quitting, you'll know it was working, but keeping everything it was doing subconscious so you didn't consciously have to deal with it. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - heavysm - 07-05-2016 (07-05-2016, 02:40 AM)thor2014 Wrote: When you say energy surges around your body ? what does it feel like ? It can feel like ecstasy and euphoria when it first hits. Then it settles into a sort of internal glow, like the world just feels right. When i push that feeling throughout my body that's when limbs start twitching and/or will feel a bit warmer. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Shannon - 07-05-2016 I have identified the first potential target scripting that passes the models. It is: Quote:all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted to I am not going to stop yet, even though the models results on this phrasing is in the 9/10 rage of desirable. It's not likely that I will better this, but I can try. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - kenpachi - 07-06-2016 Hey Shannon, I thought it was established that the legal age of consent limiter took away from the overall power of the program? For example, if I'm in a room and there's a multiple attractive women of legal age and one girl aged 15, as we're forced to stop attracting the 15 year old our sexual energy will have to be neutered and will therefore be less effective on the other attractive women of age in the room? If that's not the case then my apologies, if it is then personally I would like to see it removed if it's going to lessen our POWAR. Also, as I haven't said it yet and have mostly just been giving you feedback/demands, I wanted to say thank you for your work on this, I really appreciate your effort and dedication to making this program the best it can be. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - guarimen - 07-06-2016 it's been a while i use base 2.0 and i want to upgrade it to 2.1 how long base 2.1 duration? still 1 hour 20 minutes? and i'm not seeing md5hash base 2.1 in shanon journal. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - "Q" - 07-06-2016 (07-05-2016, 03:03 PM)Shannon Wrote: all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted toIs there any possibility (from word rate increases, and text-to-audio technology) that the user's brain hears "attractive", instead of "attracted". i.e. if the words per minute have been increased so much that the specific word can sound ambiguous on the resulting audio track, or at least the user hears it ambiguously, so interprets it as "attractive". If there is a possibility of that happening, that is a big change in dynamic to what the target will be. I suspect it might already have an influence on V2.1. In the case of V2.1, if it was misinterpreted, then that would limit the "targets" to only the people that find the user "attractive", and not the other way around. I felt that the structure, "...that I find attractive" (which some members have expressed) is more clear cut. i.e."...all people above the legal age of sexual consent, of the gender I find sexually attractive..." Note: From the perspective of an all-inclusive program, would the singular word "gender" still work for 'bi'-users in attracting both RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - swisston - 07-06-2016 (07-05-2016, 03:03 PM)Shannon Wrote: all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted toBut what if we aren't 'willing to have sex with' them? Finding someone visually appealing is a long way off wanting to have sex with them for me. I would need to meet them first... which probably isn't going to happen if the aura doesn't attract them. On top of that, for those of us in a relationship, it pretty much rules out everyone! Isn't it basically an off switch as soon as you are 'committed'? I am not 'willing to have sex with' most women I find highly desirable because that would upset my other half. I might secretly want to, but that's different. And I might be persuaded under the right circumstances! ![]() I would just remove the phrase 'I am willing to have sex with' and maybe the word 'sexually' too ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - cfact - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 03:07 AM)swisston Wrote: I would just remove the phrase 'I am willing to have sex with' and maybe the word 'sexually' too Agree with Swisston - I like the idea of "re-enforcing your sexual irresistibly by consensus"... meaning, let us say you meet 3 girls, one of whom you are most interested in (to date, have sex, whatever), it would further validate her attraction to you if all 3 felt a similar way. So... ideally they are attracted to you even though you are not technically wanting or willing to have sex with two of them. The other alternative - that two of them don't find you sexually irresistible at all - seems like it may give your primary target doubts. Moreover, isn't it a bit of an ego boost just having lots of women finding you irresistible even though you are not that interested in them? I guess might get annoying over time ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 03:07 AM)swisston Wrote:(07-05-2016, 03:03 PM)Shannon Wrote: all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted toBut what if we aren't 'willing to have sex with' them? I honestly don't even know why you'd want this program then. This program is supposed to be the ultimate "get laid" sub. Not an ego stroker for guys already "good" in that area. ![]() RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - swisston - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 04:03 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I honestly don't even know why you'd want this program then. This program is supposed to be the ultimate "get laid" sub. Not an ego stroker for guys already "good" in that area.It didn't start out that way. It started as a mix of BIATBWS and AOS. I'm pretty confident, but have never felt sexually desirable, despite being in good shape and not bad looking. I want to to be sexually attractive to women. That may indeed be for ego to a large extent, but I would also like to see where it leads my life. I am exploring my sexual side a bit more these days. I like the fact that DMSI is also about building up my inner confidence and removing guilt, fear and shame. I'd use it just for that! I don't think that being sexually irresistible has to be limited to single males looking to get laid either. Sex appeal is so much more than that. It's about how we connect with people, status and inner confidence. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - Jones - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 03:07 AM)swisston Wrote:(07-05-2016, 03:03 PM)Shannon Wrote: all of the people between the legal age of sexual consent and the maximum age I am willing to have sex with, of the gender I am sexually attracted toBut what if we aren't 'willing to have sex with' them? I agree. Perhaps changing "willing to" into "want to." The idea for this sub is to attract [women] for sex. Those of us who have relationships may not be willing to have sex with them, but the "dread game" that an LTR sometimes needs... sometimes benefits from some good, old-fashioned jealousy. and you ain't going to get jealousy from the old lady without blatant hits from the young hotties. This would also work equally well for the single dogs out there. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion - SargeMaximus - 07-06-2016 (07-06-2016, 04:14 AM)swisston Wrote:(07-06-2016, 04:03 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I honestly don't even know why you'd want this program then. This program is supposed to be the ultimate "get laid" sub. Not an ego stroker for guys already "good" in that area.It didn't start out that way. It started as a mix of BIATBWS and AOS. Fair enough, but having sex is part of sexuality. You can't separate the two. |