Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-08-2018 (10-07-2018, 02:12 PM)mat422 Wrote: Question for you Shannon. Is the auric shield an energetic construct or is it more like a filter that doesn't let things get into the aura? The auric shield is a modulation of the aura such that the outer layer of it becomes a non-directional reflection shield. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-08-2018 (10-07-2018, 07:45 PM)Wharrgarbl Wrote: Shannon Sure, it's possible. I'm hoping to make a lot of progress on that this month. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-08-2018 (10-08-2018, 09:35 AM)Masterchief Wrote:(10-07-2018, 12:27 PM)Shannon Wrote:(10-07-2018, 09:08 AM)Masterchief Wrote: Hi Shannon. Hope you're good. Version A is focused on trying to get you to heal and clear whatever stands in your way of executing. So if on A you focus on her and on B you don't, something about her and your experience with her stands in your way of executing. Just because it isn't addressed directly in B doesn't change that. I would keep cycling. You may have other fears and irrational reasons for being afraid of success. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-08-2018 (10-08-2018, 10:27 AM)4Kingdoms Wrote:(10-08-2018, 10:09 AM)blth Wrote: Do you think you will make able to combine dmsi 3.3 and uslm2 when 3.3 is released? I have not worked yet on making it possible to combine subs. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ncbeareatingman - 10-08-2018 Hows the work with USLM2 Upgrades coming along? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 10-08-2018 Chin up, Shannon, everybody experiences stage fright of some kind every now and again! It's probably because you're invested in making the program as good as you can make it right now, which ain't a bad thing to be. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - TheChosenOne - 10-08-2018 Regarding whats bothering you, I know its not going to the popular opinion, but I think Ultra-Success and Luck Magnitizer should be separate programs. I wrote why here: https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Men-s-Title-Requests-Suggestions-Ultra-Success-5-5G-–-Manifesting-Create-Your-Own-Reality- Also, if this program doesn't do whats expected as a Test Release, you'll have 2 experimental subs you will have to work on at the same time (DMSI being the other); that's not even counting the other updated programs such as UMOP and LTU 5.5G. That's a lot to crank out over the Holiday Season and unfortunately I've seen this pattern before. I may get flamed for this but you may be setting yourself up for overwhelm. Just make sure to get a lot rest. Of course, I'm not building the program, only buying them. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Hatman - 10-08-2018 (10-08-2018, 01:41 PM)TheChosenOne Wrote: Regarding whats bothering you, I know its not going to the popular opinion, but I think Ultra-Success and Luck Magnitizer should be separate programs. I think US and LM work very well together if you're going for success. Separating them would be a downgrade. However, for those who want luck only, a standalone Luck Maximizer would be good. That's only my opinion. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-08-2018 (10-08-2018, 01:41 PM)TheChosenOne Wrote: Regarding whats bothering you, I know its not going to the popular opinion, but I think Ultra-Success and Luck Magnitizer should be separate programs. I can certainly make these as separate programs, but I don't think you're really understanding why I do things the way I do based on considering your posted suggestions and arguments for them. I don't tell you in every post what all the modules are about each program I release. The ones in the skeleton script are standard, and may be turned on or off, but they get repeated. If you imagine a solar energy farm, there are hundreds of individual mirrors in different locations, but each one is focused on achieving the exact same goal. The result is molten salt, which is incredibly hot, which is used to boil water and create steam, which drives a dynamo, which generates electricity. Each of those mirrors by itself may not seem to have much to do with generating electricity, but combined and focused as a whole, they achieve the goal, and do it much better than any one of them could. That is the approach I take in the skeleton script with all the sub-modules. Further, you're not understanding how I generate "luck" (because I did not explain it), or the fact that US and LM are created in such a way in this program that they are synergistic. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - KingDavid93 - 10-08-2018 Hi Shannon, If/when you remake it in 6G, would US and LM be made separately- or would it be US/LM in 6G? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ncbeareatingman - 10-08-2018 Post: #3417RE: Shannon's Journal, Volume 2 I have learned never to ignore that feeling when it tells me that something is wrong. So I went through everything again and again until I found the issue. It is now fixed and everything is green lighted. We are building starting... now. Me: Just saw this a little while ago.... cool... green light,awesome and No crosstown traffic!! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ResJudicata - 10-08-2018 Eh, I figured I should post this. Thanks Shannon for everything you do and taking the time to answer our questions whether they be simple and dumb or thought provoking and important (whether we realize which they actually are or not ). RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - TheChosenOne - 10-08-2018 (10-08-2018, 02:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: I can certainly make these as separate programs, but I don't think you're really understanding why I do things the way I do based on considering your posted suggestions and arguments for them. So is this an Experimental Test Release with Feedback necessary, or is it a Final Version? That post was written in 2016 (over 2 years ago) and was leaning more towards falling more behind in work (due to DMSI), as there have been a lot of technology changes since then. If it is an experimental, I will hold off on using it (I was 1 of the first to buy it and use USLM). You've stated if we want to use a FINAL version than wait until it's released. If these programs run 35 Days after the last loop (P6) then you really only have the option to run USLM, DMSI, UMOP or LTU 5.5g in the next 90 Days without conflicting scripts (Resistance). By the way I've purchased all of these except LTU 5.5G obviously. I would rather wait until LTU is released in which you mentioned seems to be close towards a building point. Like I mentioned in my last post, you may have all this completely under control, but I was under the interpretation that it was a Test Release and people would be giving feedback (like DMSI) and that you shouldn't overwhelm yourself with re-releasing the same programs over and over IF people didn't get the desired results, as it was a Test Release. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - sushi521 - 10-08-2018 (10-08-2018, 04:14 PM)TheChosenOne Wrote:It's not a test release in the sense DMSI is, or it would've been stated in the product page like DMSI. No program is final since they can all be improved in 6G.(10-08-2018, 02:38 PM)Shannon Wrote: I can certainly make these as separate programs, but I don't think you're really understanding why I do things the way I do based on considering your posted suggestions and arguments for them. |