Subliminal Talk
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 05:40 AM)Kol Wrote: Shannon, does DMSI has something in the script regarding spontaneous visualisations involving the senses, like, experience lucid experiences of women making out with me, having scenarios popping up and so on? Is it subconscious training?

What you are describing is usually the subconscious communicating to the conscious what it is focused on.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Kol - 10-05-2018

Sweet. Thank you.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - KingDavid93 - 10-05-2018

Since USLM is now being upgraded will the new additions find their way into the skeleton script and into 3.3 as an additional way to drive the script and lead us to maximum execution and maximum success with regards to the goals of the sub?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - KingDavid93 - 10-05-2018

Also will USLM A also be receiving these upgrades or will that remain the same?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 06:39 AM)KingDavid93 Wrote: Since USLM is now being upgraded will the new additions find their way into the skeleton script and into 3.3 as an additional way to drive the script and lead us to maximum execution and maximum success with regards to the goals of the sub?

That depends on what the models tell me. It may or may not be a good idea to put this entire script into the skeleton script, since it is pretty hardcore and may distract from the key and primary scripts of anything that I try to build with it in the skeleton script.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 06:40 AM)KingDavid93 Wrote: Also will USLM A also be receiving these upgrades or will that remain the same?

I have to rebuild both A and B for this.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - RTBoss - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 05:24 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I disagree since I’ve wanted a lot of sex my whole life but haven’t gotten much. I know you’ll say “ well you obviously don’t want it then” but I do but I also won’t beg so there’s not much I can do except put my desires out there. So far, however, the results are lacking. But it’s not from lack of desire.

Yet if a woman positions herself close to you in public, and doesn't speak, you bug out. Clearly your conscious desire for sex hasn't overcome that particular fear, which would constitute just one of many possible barriers to get to sex.

And don't even say, "Yeah, but, DMSI should get her to talk!" Maybe so, but I'm pointing out the clear existence of fear present in that scenario. Who knows the myriad other ways your subconscious fears are manifesting.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - hsindermann - 10-05-2018

Hi Shannon, quick question: Do you plan on incorporating the new fear removal module in UMOP as well?


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 06:57 AM)RTBoss Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 05:24 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I disagree since I’ve wanted a lot of sex my whole life but haven’t gotten much. I know you’ll say “ well you obviously don’t want it then” but I do but I also won’t beg so there’s not much I can do except put my desires out there. So far, however, the results are lacking. But it’s not from lack of desire.

Yet if a woman positions herself close to you in public, and doesn't speak, you bug out. Clearly your conscious desire for sex hasn't overcome that particular fear, which would constitute just one of many possible barriers to get to sex.

And don't even say, "Yeah, but, DMSI should get her to talk!" Maybe so, but I'm pointing out the clear existence of fear present in that scenario. Who knows the myriad other ways your subconscious fears are manifesting.

Fair but like you pointed out: she should say something.

@Shannon: I haven’t been offered sex as much as you insist. Approached yes, but I always mess it up. If they would ask: when and where do you want to have sex with me, I’d tell them. But in the example RTBoss cites, it’s more complicated and the more complicated things are, the easier things are to mess up. Compare switching on a light switch to designing a working rocket tgat will land like Elon Musk did. You can’t tell me his desire wasn’t there till when it finally worked, no, the desire was always there but it was complex and that’s why it failed so many times till he finally succeeded.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - AriGold - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 07:54 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 06:57 AM)RTBoss Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 05:24 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I disagree since I’ve wanted a lot of sex my whole life but haven’t gotten much. I know you’ll say “ well you obviously don’t want it then” but I do but I also won’t beg so there’s not much I can do except put my desires out there. So far, however, the results are lacking. But it’s not from lack of desire.

Yet if a woman positions herself close to you in public, and doesn't speak, you bug out. Clearly your conscious desire for sex hasn't overcome that particular fear, which would constitute just one of many possible barriers to get to sex.

And don't even say, "Yeah, but, DMSI should get her to talk!" Maybe so, but I'm pointing out the clear existence of fear present in that scenario. Who knows the myriad other ways your subconscious fears are manifesting.

Fair but like you pointed out: she should say something.

@Shannon: I haven’t been offered sex as much as you insist. Approached yes, but I always mess it up. If they would ask: when and where do you want to have sex with me, I’d tell them. But in the example RTBoss cites, it’s more complicated and the more complicated things are, the easier things are to mess up. Compare switching on a light switch to designing a working rocket tgat will land like Elon Musk did. You can’t tell me his desire wasn’t there till when it finally worked, no, the desire was always there but it was complex and that’s why it failed so many times till he finally succeeded.

It seems like you have to learn more about how women communicate. They communicate it more subtle. And it is more like they come close to you and with their body language saying "I am interested in (having sex with) you" with the next sentence in mind "if you don't fuck it up on the way to the bedroom".
As Shannon somewhere earlier (not in this thread) said, you should make her feel safe (and that kind of safe might vary from woman to woman) to open up to you. It also depends on the quality of the woman you are after.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 08:59 AM)AriGold Wrote: It seems like you have to learn more about how women communicate. They communicate it more subtle. And it is more like they come close to you and with their body language saying "I am interested in (having sex with) you" with the next sentence in mind "if you don't **** it up on the way to the bedroom".
As Shannon somewhere earlier (not in this thread) said, you should make her feel safe (and that kind of safe might vary from woman to woman) to open up to you. It also depends on the quality of the woman you are after.

Yes well, that's the rocket science isn't it? And that's why I'm learning PUA. But I have hope that DMSI's aura can overcome that.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ncbeareatingman - 10-05-2018

Shannon's words from his closed,journal:
"But please know that I am not trying to maximize just the luck in this one. I'm trying to push the success to the max also. "

My Response:" Wild thing, dah dah dah dah dahhhh you make my heart sing!! YOU Make EVERYTHING groovy,is that right? Wild Thing!!" Ha!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J8kn01kGz10


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 07:15 AM)hsindermann Wrote: Hi Shannon, quick question: Do you plan on incorporating the new fear removal module in UMOP as well?

When I rebuild it, yes. I don't think I can do that right away though.


RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-05-2018

(10-05-2018, 07:54 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 06:57 AM)RTBoss Wrote:
(10-05-2018, 05:24 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: I disagree since I’ve wanted a lot of sex my whole life but haven’t gotten much. I know you’ll say “ well you obviously don’t want it then” but I do but I also won’t beg so there’s not much I can do except put my desires out there. So far, however, the results are lacking. But it’s not from lack of desire.

Yet if a woman positions herself close to you in public, and doesn't speak, you bug out. Clearly your conscious desire for sex hasn't overcome that particular fear, which would constitute just one of many possible barriers to get to sex.

And don't even say, "Yeah, but, DMSI should get her to talk!" Maybe so, but I'm pointing out the clear existence of fear present in that scenario. Who knows the myriad other ways your subconscious fears are manifesting.

Fair but like you pointed out: she should say something.

@Shannon: I haven’t been offered sex as much as you insist. Approached yes, but I always mess it up. If they would ask: when and where do you want to have sex with me, I’d tell them. But in the example RTBoss cites, it’s more complicated and the more complicated things are, the easier things are to mess up. Compare switching on a light switch to designing a working rocket tgat will land like Elon Musk did. You can’t tell me his desire wasn’t there till when it finally worked, no, the desire was always there but it was complex and that’s why it failed so many times till he finally succeeded.

What we seem to be failing with in the communication here is that I am not insisting you have had a lot of sex. I'm trying to communicate the simple fact that changing "as much as you allow" to "as much as you want" is useless because you will never allow what you don't want, and the both of them can be thwarted by a method that is already being used as a loophole.

I need to find a solution that does not use either one.