![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 10-01-2018 Yeah, TBH Ive been a club promoter for a couple of years before. Its easy as hell to get girls. You have an excuse to approach and charm hot women and they dont mind it because they know(or think) your main goal is to sell them a club ticket. They also know subconsciously that you're popular/confident and know how to connect with girls. You also provide them with fun experience by getting them into clubs. That is, if you are actually a good promoter and not scared to talk to girls. Believe it or not, there are promoters that are scared of girls. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 10-01-2018 (10-01-2018, 07:26 AM)kingpill Wrote: Yeah, TBH Ive been a club promoter for a couple of years before. Its easy as hell to get girls. You have an excuse to approach and charm hot women and they dont mind it because they know(or think) your main goal is to sell them a club ticket. They also know subconsciously that you're popular/confident and know how to connect with girls. You also provide them with fun experience by getting them into clubs. I’d like to hear more about your experiences and why you don’t do it anymore but I dont want to derail the thread. Pm me? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - lano1106 - 10-01-2018 (10-01-2018, 07:24 AM)Determined Wrote:(09-30-2018, 08:10 PM)lano1106 Wrote:(09-30-2018, 05:49 PM)Determined Wrote:(09-30-2018, 07:33 AM)lano1106 Wrote:(09-30-2018, 06:58 AM)Determined Wrote: He did all that without DMSI. Imagine that. I never said that it was hard to believe that he did that. I was highlighting the oddity that you find a guy laying over 6,000 girls connecting with women in contrast to objectifying them. While, in my definition, the simple act of keeping a laycount is by definition an objectification and I could be wrong but after a certain point, each girl become just a number. That being said, I'm not making a judgement if it is good or bad. As long as everyone is consenting and happy, it is all good in my book. However, I felt like you were insinuating that *I* was objectifying women because I was curious about what DMSI would do to a guy with a 6,000 laycount and that him instead was connecting with women hence was having a lot of sex. I didn't like what you were suggesting FYI, you can have a lot of sex without ever connecting with your multiple partners... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-01-2018 (09-30-2018, 02:05 AM)samba99 Wrote:(09-29-2018, 10:04 PM)Shannon Wrote:Shannon I think you should leave out this for us to deal with. I fear it may create confusion on the target. I have experienced similar results on 3.0 however it was both of us falling in love.(09-29-2018, 09:00 PM)lano1106 Wrote: I just want to point out that upon using DMSI 3.1 in July 2017 after only 2 weeks, I got my first and only DMSI success. It did happen exactly as advertised. Killing the "baby rabies" may be possible without confusing the people affected. However, I am not sure it can be done without lessening the effect, since there is nothing more powerful than the drive to reproduce. I am going to see if I can't find why they're responding that way, and turn it into a desire for sex for fun, instead. If it's possible, why not? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-01-2018 (09-30-2018, 02:16 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: @Shannon The key to being helpful is to help me understand how and why you are resisting, and how to help you execute instead. So far the only thing I have been able to do to figure this out is build, observe, adjust, repeat. The next few versions of DMSI are going to need to be tested by the most challenging of you. I'm seeing a definite pattern in why the resistance is happening, and what is behind it. Figuring out how to change it to execution is what I'm working on now. The only thing I can suggest is, keep doing DMSI when it comes out, and stick to whatever instructions I give you during the run. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-01-2018 (09-30-2018, 08:32 AM)Wharrgarbl Wrote: Shannon is there any plans to include into LTU modules that will alter peoples perception of us? I really enjoyed the celebrity effect and got offered a few management jobs from it. No. LTU isn't designed to affect others' perception of you. It's designed to affect you, make you better, make your life better, and make things better for you. It's not about other people, it's about you. If others change their perception of you as a result, it will be because you are a happier, more successful person as a result, most likely. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-01-2018 (09-30-2018, 03:15 PM)worldpua Wrote: Shannon, since i started BASE i have some really good results. My productivity is very high, i got two minor strategy adjustments, i constructed my schedule better, my focus is better than before and financially everything is slightly better, all these in nine days of listening base while i took a break only 3-4 days from uslm. Do you think those results are from USLM or BASE? If you dont know can you give me an estimation, like you are 70% sure it uslm and 30% BASE. I lost the ''high feeling'' the last 4 days and i got insane headache even though i listen from speakers. Can you tell me why you think that happened? Thank you in advance I think those results are from USLM and BASE. When you lost the high feeling and got the headache, you were experiencing what we call turbulence, which is what happens when you don't follow the instructions and let one sub fade before the other is started. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-01-2018 (09-30-2018, 05:02 PM)Hatman Wrote: UMOP is not included in USLM as a goal or subgoal. The motivation is a natural side effect of USLM. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-01-2018 (09-30-2018, 05:39 PM)CatMan Wrote: Just one reference in there is left now, @Shannon : https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Men-s-Journals-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3-?pid=206650#pid206650 Done. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-01-2018 (09-30-2018, 08:23 PM)dissonance Wrote: LTU is gonna get made after dimsee 3.3, if I remember correctly right? Yes, it looks like given how things are going, it is best if I just focus on DMSI 3.3 and then build other things. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 10-01-2018 (10-01-2018, 08:33 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-30-2018, 02:05 AM)samba99 Wrote:(09-29-2018, 10:04 PM)Shannon Wrote:Shannon I think you should leave out this for us to deal with. I fear it may create confusion on the target. I have experienced similar results on 3.0 however it was both of us falling in love.(09-29-2018, 09:00 PM)lano1106 Wrote: I just want to point out that upon using DMSI 3.1 in July 2017 after only 2 weeks, I got my first and only DMSI success. It did happen exactly as advertised. This is promising. Can you also maybe make it so that the "baby rabies" woman is willing to go at the user's pace so as not to lose out on his babies? Like, if she thinks sex for fun is what will win you over and lead to babies down the road. I'll try to explain it better: what if "sex for fun" or "as long as the user desires it" was a pre-condition of babies and commitment? That's pretty much how it works in real life anyways, people don't commit to other people (generally) until after the partner has proven themselves. It would be easy to make the user the judge of when she "passes the test" and, in the meantime, sex for fun is part of the requirements. (as would be aborting unwanted pregnancies and not having babies till the user wanted them) I'm thinking of Californication where Moody had that crazy chick who ended up trying to kill him (I'm not saying we want girls like that, and, to clear it up once and for all: I would absolutely be FOR the anti-sniper on that type of woman), anyhow, the situation is that she does everything he wants and frames herself as a casual lay, but eventually you realize she was just doing that because she wanted him to commit. I'm sure that kind of dynamic happens in real life as well and it could be used in DMSI. Anyhow, just an idea. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 10-01-2018 (10-01-2018, 08:43 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(10-01-2018, 08:33 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-30-2018, 02:05 AM)samba99 Wrote:(09-29-2018, 10:04 PM)Shannon Wrote:Shannon I think you should leave out this for us to deal with. I fear it may create confusion on the target. I have experienced similar results on 3.0 however it was both of us falling in love.(09-29-2018, 09:00 PM)lano1106 Wrote: I just want to point out that upon using DMSI 3.1 in July 2017 after only 2 weeks, I got my first and only DMSI success. It did happen exactly as advertised. So you're suggesting that we get people who respond to intentionally try to deceive the user in a different way, to achieve the same exact goal. Not what I had in mind. I think the best way to go forward is to figure out what exactly it is in the script that's triggering baby rabies, and then turn it into seeking sex for fun, while leaving things open for the user and the affected to change it to something more if they like, but making it so sex with the user is always fun and always desirable and sought out because of that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - SargeMaximus - 10-01-2018 (10-01-2018, 08:48 AM)Shannon Wrote:(10-01-2018, 08:43 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:(10-01-2018, 08:33 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-30-2018, 02:05 AM)samba99 Wrote:(09-29-2018, 10:04 PM)Shannon Wrote: This is useful information. We need to find a way to prevent them from going off the deep end if possible. This may not be possible; it may be something that you guys will have to learn to deal with. But this shows that the program does work, if executed.Shannon I think you should leave out this for us to deal with. I fear it may create confusion on the target. I have experienced similar results on 3.0 however it was both of us falling in love. No, no deceiving. I want kids one day myself. I'm sure anyone would if the right conditions were met. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 10-01-2018 (10-01-2018, 07:30 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote:Pm'ed(10-01-2018, 07:26 AM)kingpill Wrote: Yeah, TBH Ive been a club promoter for a couple of years before. Its easy as hell to get girls. You have an excuse to approach and charm hot women and they dont mind it because they know(or think) your main goal is to sell them a club ticket. They also know subconsciously that you're popular/confident and know how to connect with girls. You also provide them with fun experience by getting them into clubs. |