![]() |
Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - ncbeareatingman - 09-29-2018 (09-29-2018, 09:00 PM)lano1106 Wrote: I just want to point out that upon using DMSI 3.1 in July 2017 after only 2 weeks, I got my first and only DMSI success. It did happen exactly as advertised. Ding!! Bonus Round!! thank you for such GOOD NEWS. thats awesome!! RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-29-2018 (09-29-2018, 07:26 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Thank you Shannon for clarifying that. Much of my theory is now down the drain, which suits me fine. DMSI doesn't need you to learn PUA. If you feel that is the case, or believe that DMSI/OE led you to that, it is because that may have been the only way your subconscious could think of to advance to the goal. But there is nothing in DMSI that suggests to you to learn PUA, or demands or requires it. In fact I give very clear and specific instructions on how to become irresistibly sexually attractive without doing that. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-29-2018 @CatMan We do not agree on some things, and you do not seem to understand what I was trying to point out with my referencing the story, but I'm tired and I'm not going to try to address them. I'll remove the references to it in my posts, and you remove the references to it in yours. I'd like you to understand that I am not saying that DMSI will never get results for you and others like you. I believe that at least the last version or two can and will get results for you and others like you. But if I focus on making it work as well as possible for the majority, and even when I try to get as many people on board as that majority as possible, it will not be focused exactly on the specific things you personally need it to be focused on for it to work as well as it could if I was to focus it on you specifically. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-29-2018 (09-29-2018, 09:00 PM)lano1106 Wrote: I just want to point out that upon using DMSI 3.1 in July 2017 after only 2 weeks, I got my first and only DMSI success. It did happen exactly as advertised. This is useful information. We need to find a way to prevent them from going off the deep end if possible. This may not be possible; it may be something that you guys will have to learn to deal with. But this shows that the program does work, if executed. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - MasterEnki - 09-29-2018 Yeah, pretty sure that everyone is irresistibly attractive to someone (or a small niche group of people). While I wait for LTU 5.5g to come out, I’m consciously working on building a solid frame of “I’m a little weird. I’m a little different from what is considered popular. I have many things that I’m naturally inept at. I’m kinda socially awkward. But, I’m amazingly attractive to some people out there, and those people include women that would love to have sex with me. A very small niche group of women in the world would even pay me to have sex with me / have a chance to have sex with me, etc.” The challenge is finding those people that naturally have amazing ‘chemistry’ with you / automatically ‘click’ with you. Though, I’m sure that manifestation will help heaps in finding / meeting those people. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - dissonance - 09-29-2018 (09-29-2018, 03:53 PM)mat422 Wrote: Not for nothing, but until you've had an abundant sex life how can you know it's not for you? The "I know what I want" can very easily just be the comfort zone. "This is what I'm familiar with therefore I'll stick to it instead of venturing outside of it". That's like saying you dislike a certain food you've never even tried. It's totally possible that the abundant sex life isn't for some people, but what I'm saying is how can you know for certain? Intuition or feeling? We all know how deceptive those can be. Not having a go at anyone in particular, it's just really easy to fall off the design goals of DMSI through self sabotage such as this. I am going to have an abundant sex life, just with 1 person, and a DEEP INTENSE mind body soul sex/love connection. You could even say its even more abundant than a "player's" abundance, just abundance of a different sort. I've learned I prefer that type of abundance over quantity abundance with lots of not so deep connections. That's me though, not everyone will want this sort of deep intense mind body soul connection. And to answer your question, I know for certain because I know myself. Also, I'm going through a spiritual awakening of sorts, and also, things have confirmed by a couple psychics (legit lightworkers who can read see and feel energy and consciousness and look into the akashic records, among other abilities), and last but not least, astrology. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - dissonance - 09-29-2018 (09-29-2018, 09:52 PM)Shannon Wrote:(09-29-2018, 07:26 PM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Thank you Shannon for clarifying that. Much of my theory is now down the drain, which suits me fine. Definitely doesn't need PUA. I would talk to coworkers naturally without trying to seduce or game or anything like that, just normal everyday small talk or work talk or casual shootin' the shit for fun kinda thing, and they would clearly show signs of sexual attraction. Customers as well. One of the most funny (to me) examples is a coworker who every time she comes up to me to say something (work related; i work in a restaurant), she gets really close and almost always pushes her breasts onto me. I've never actually shown any sexual interest in her (except for NOT shying away when she gets that physically close and in contact with me), but she was doing this from the moment she met me. Almost all female coworkers literally have shown or do show attraction to me in some form or another, and I never use anything PUA on them. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - DarthXedonias - 09-29-2018 (09-29-2018, 10:04 PM)Shannon Wrote:(09-29-2018, 09:00 PM)lano1106 Wrote: I just want to point out that upon using DMSI 3.1 in July 2017 after only 2 weeks, I got my first and only DMSI success. It did happen exactly as advertised. I have experienced this as well. When I met the one woman from the Philippines it was lots of sex all the time and she said she fell very much in "love" with me. Only thing is after I got back some of the arguments started happening every couple of days. Why? Because she kept on trying to convince me to give her a baby the next time I came over there. Even if the next time I wasn't going to be their permanently yet. She also mentioned that normally in a relationship she acts more shy and less affectionate but with me she said she changed and acted affectionate all the time. It does make me think if you execute as expected that maybe it will trigger the "baby Rabies" phenomenon in a lot of women. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - lano1106 - 09-29-2018 (09-29-2018, 10:04 PM)Shannon Wrote: This is useful information. We need to find a way to prevent them from going off the deep end if possible. This may not be possible; it may be something that you guys will have to learn to deal with. But this shows that the program does work, if executed. My solution to this challenge has been to man up a bit more. Hence, I am on AM6 now... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - lano1106 - 09-29-2018 (09-29-2018, 10:57 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote: It does make me think if you execute as expected that maybe it will trigger the "baby Rabies" phenomenon in a lot of women. I think you are on something. Biologically, procreate is the end goal of having sex. If you come up as the most irresistible man sexually that she has ever met, it makes sense that she connects the dots that way... RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - wolverine_i_am - 09-29-2018 Regarding Catman, I just wanna add that I've been following his journal since the beginning. Even I've noticed in some posts from before where you've mentioned girls reacting to you differently. And you say you also get looks from girls every now and then, but you dismiss it cause according to you it is nothing. Looks do count for something. A girl wouldn't look at you if there's no interest or attraction. It's the beginning of a girl wanting something with you. May be far from the end goal, but it's not nothing. I get the feeling you ignore a lotta results, like Shannon said, cause in your mind it doesn't count if a girl didn't outright tell you she likes you, so you just dismiss it and say nothing happened. Or if an interaction with a girl went really well, you will ignore/dismiss the subtle positive things, because looking back you won't count anything as a result if it didn't end up in sex or at least a make out. You tend to focus more on the negatives than the positives. This isn't an attack towards you. We all want you to succeed Catman. I'm pointing out that maybe the lack of optimism may be affecting you from getting more out of this thing. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Kol - 09-30-2018 (09-29-2018, 10:57 PM)DarthXedonias Wrote:(09-29-2018, 10:04 PM)Shannon Wrote:(09-29-2018, 09:00 PM)lano1106 Wrote: I just want to point out that upon using DMSI 3.1 in July 2017 after only 2 weeks, I got my first and only DMSI success. It did happen exactly as advertised. Yes, this 17 y/o has putted me in her phone as "my king" and tried to convince me to put her in my phone under the name "my queen" lol Also, talking about babies, marriage, overt sexual talk and steering it that way, accusing me of getting a hard on while she was grinding her ass on me the first time she saw me. She hsd the whole thing planned out. Very claimy. When I called her out on that, she didnt even deny that. Fond memories lmao RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Catman - 09-30-2018 Thank you, Shannon. I meant no disrespect. I admit I have huge gaps in knowledge in the area of women. I will take the words into consideration. I still plan to use every version of the program! Until the last shell! Thank you deeply. For everything. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - samba99 - 09-30-2018 (09-29-2018, 10:04 PM)Shannon Wrote:Shannon I think you should leave out this for us to deal with. I fear it may create confusion on the target. I have experienced similar results on 3.0 however it was both of us falling in love.(09-29-2018, 09:00 PM)lano1106 Wrote: I just want to point out that upon using DMSI 3.1 in July 2017 after only 2 weeks, I got my first and only DMSI success. It did happen exactly as advertised. |