+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW)
+--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals)
+--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 03-13-2018
I just realized how powerful telling yourself conciously to execute the script can be. Simply replacing every thought with "execute the script" has given me significantly more iois
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 03-13-2018
Ive also noticed that I get a lot of interest from girls but if I show any sign of interest back, they seem to look pissed off or turned off, only to later give me iois again. Any reason for this?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Steve_ - 03-13-2018
You guys are killing me here. Can you please only quote one or two posts at a time instead of replying with a blue wall of old text? A quick edit to do so will ensure your post is understood and it helps to make things look clean and flow well.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - dissonance - 03-13-2018
(03-13-2018, 03:10 AM)Shannon Wrote:(03-12-2018, 03:25 PM)kingpill Wrote: Shannon, how would DMSI primed at relationships differ from DMSI now? Thanks
It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.
I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Jake2015 - 03-13-2018
Quote:Once again:
A has direct H&C turned on, and will attempt to either dissolve the mountain standing in your way (reasons for resistance/failure/resistance itself) or walk you around it to the other side.
B has the Optimus Engine, which will find a way to the goal through whatever stands in the way. In effect of there is no way for B to achieve the goal shy of dealing with that mountain, it will either destroy the mountain or shoot the target right through it.
One way or the other, you will get past that mountain to the goal if you are executing.
So wait A dissolves or walks around
B destroys said mountain or shoot through it.
Dissolve or destroy, not the same?
In my case im not fapping - better to stick with B or move to A when it lands to get more results, more execution and destroy any resistance? Hurray im not stonewalling Shannon
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 03-13-2018
(03-13-2018, 09:02 AM)kingpill Wrote: I just realized how powerful telling yourself conciously to execute the script can be. Simply replacing every thought with "execute the script" has given me significantly more iois
Yes, involving the conscious mind and it's will is a powerful ally in creating change. That is in fact what I believe makes hypnosis and NLP so powerful and obvious when they are done successfully. They both involve the conscious mind, even at the deepest levels of state.
I am attempting to do it in reverse, which is challenging.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 03-13-2018
(03-13-2018, 09:16 AM)kingpill Wrote: Ive also noticed that I get a lot of interest from girls but if I show any sign of interest back, they seem to look pissed off or turned off, only to later give me iois again. Any reason for this?
There are a lot of potential explanations. I suggest you let them advance instead of returning interest, and see what happens.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 03-13-2018
(03-13-2018, 10:21 AM)dissonance Wrote:(03-13-2018, 03:10 AM)Shannon Wrote:(03-12-2018, 03:25 PM)kingpill Wrote: Shannon, how would DMSI primed at relationships differ from DMSI now? Thanks
It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.
I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then
It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 03-13-2018
(03-13-2018, 10:24 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:Quote:Once again:
A has direct H&C turned on, and will attempt to either dissolve the mountain standing in your way (reasons for resistance/failure/resistance itself) or walk you around it to the other side.
B has the Optimus Engine, which will find a way to the goal through whatever stands in the way. In effect of there is no way for B to achieve the goal shy of dealing with that mountain, it will either destroy the mountain or shoot the target right through it.
One way or the other, you will get past that mountain to the goal if you are executing.
So wait A dissolves or walks around
B destroys said mountain or shoot through it.
Dissolve or destroy, not the same?
In my case im not fapping - better to stick with B or move to A when it lands to get more results, more execution and destroy any resistance? Hurray im not stonewalling Shannon
A is a gentle approach. B is a forced march. They will both achieve the goal if you execute, but not in the same way or at the same speed.
What you run when A comes out is up to you.
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Oversoul - 03-13-2018
(03-13-2018, 10:24 AM)Jake2015 Wrote:Quote:Once again:
A has direct H&C turned on, and will attempt to either dissolve the mountain standing in your way (reasons for resistance/failure/resistance itself) or walk you around it to the other side.
B has the Optimus Engine, which will find a way to the goal through whatever stands in the way. In effect of there is no way for B to achieve the goal shy of dealing with that mountain, it will either destroy the mountain or shoot the target right through it.
One way or the other, you will get past that mountain to the goal if you are executing.
So wait A dissolves or walks around
B destroys said mountain or shoot through it.
Dissolve or destroy, not the same?
In my case im not fapping - better to stick with B or move to A when it lands to get more results, more execution and destroy any resistance? Hurray im not stonewalling Shannon
What worked for me for getting rid of fapping/tiredness is that after u realize what it is (a form of resistance) simply repeating "execute the script" using BOTH your mind and your emotions does wonders.
This can also be done for anything else that can be seen as resistance (looking at chicks on insta, daydreaming etc). Literally anything Shannon has said is a resistance has been easily bypassed with this (for me anyway)and led me to execute.
Maybe you should give it a go to see if it works for you?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - RisingSon - 03-13-2018
Nah, what you really gotta do is start SCREAMING. Last night I got so angry at negative thoughts I set them on fire with my mind and sent out a mental wall of blue fire while screaming my head off. It was sort of like that movie Carrie. Maybe this will help you guys execute. I'm sure as hell not gay and don't even like women but that was pretty fun.
Btw, ever hear of the metagene?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - dissonance - 03-13-2018
(03-13-2018, 10:33 AM)Shannon Wrote:(03-13-2018, 10:21 AM)dissonance Wrote:(03-13-2018, 03:10 AM)Shannon Wrote:(03-12-2018, 03:25 PM)kingpill Wrote: Shannon, how would DMSI primed at relationships differ from DMSI now? Thanks
It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.
I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then
It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.
Ok that's understandable. If I were to run it during a committed relationship, which aspects of it would help the relationship, if I consciously kept myself from seducing and flirting with other girls? I'm guessing the sexual performance modules would most likely... but what else?
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 03-13-2018
(03-13-2018, 12:15 PM)dissonance Wrote:(03-13-2018, 10:33 AM)Shannon Wrote:(03-13-2018, 10:21 AM)dissonance Wrote:(03-13-2018, 03:10 AM)Shannon Wrote:(03-12-2018, 03:25 PM)kingpill Wrote: Shannon, how would DMSI primed at relationships differ from DMSI now? Thanks
It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.
I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then
It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.
Ok that's understandable. If I were to run it during a committed relationship, which aspects of it would help the relationship, if I consciously kept myself from seducing and flirting with other girls? I'm guessing the sexual performance modules would most likely... but what else?
Define "it".
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - dissonance - 03-13-2018
(03-13-2018, 12:48 PM)Shannon Wrote:(03-13-2018, 12:15 PM)dissonance Wrote:(03-13-2018, 10:33 AM)Shannon Wrote:(03-13-2018, 10:21 AM)dissonance Wrote:(03-13-2018, 03:10 AM)Shannon Wrote: It would be designed to focus the user on the significant other for the effects of the program, and remove aspects of the program (or redirect them) that would otherwise threaten it. I have already had a couple of people tell me they had to stop using 3.2 because if they didn't they would cheat on their SO. The couples friendly version would aim to strengthen the relationship, instead.
I'm pretty stoked for this. Hopefully it'll make it into 3.3 because I feel like I'm going to get a girlfriend by then
It will not. I am not creating DMSI for couples until DMSI standard is finished. Branching the development stream is suicide.
Ok that's understandable. If I were to run it during a committed relationship, which aspects of it would help the relationship, if I consciously kept myself from seducing and flirting with other girls? I'm guessing the sexual performance modules would most likely... but what else?
Define "it".
DMSI 3.2b, and maybe 3.2a if i feel i need it