Subliminal Talk
How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? - Printable Version

+- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com)
+-- Forum: Welcome! (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Welcome)
+--- Forum: Customer Polls (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Customer-Polls)
+--- Thread: How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? (/Thread-How-do-you-think-DMSI-v5-should-be-handled)

Pages: 1 2 3


RE: How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? - samba99 - 04-10-2025

(04-09-2025, 11:42 PM)Shannon Wrote: You will have to reserve judgement of what DMSI-Next is, for when you run it.  6G is very, very different from the tech that v3.5 or even 4.0 was built in.

Shannon

Are you planning to create a separate thread for DMSI 6G suggestions, or is that no longer on the table?

One key feature I’d love to see given more emphasis is the inclusion of a “Sex Drive & Orgasm Maximization” module. You might ask why this is important—here’s what I’ve noticed:

Whenever my sexual experiences are intense and fulfilling, it seems to supercharge my aura. In other words, I end up executing the script far more effectively, and the external results become noticeably stronger and more amplified.

It makes perfect sense to leverage this as a way to energize the script and outcomes even further, essentially creating a reinforcing feedback loop.


RE: How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? - Zeroxmachina - 04-11-2025

(04-09-2025, 11:42 PM)Shannon Wrote: You will have to reserve judgement of what DMSI-Next is, for when you run it.  6G is very, very different from the tech that v3.5 or even 4.0 was built in.

Can't wait. I'm ready to fire it up!  Pirate Pirate Pirate


RE: How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? - StridingStrider - 04-11-2025

(04-11-2025, 05:02 AM)Zeroxmachina Wrote:
(04-09-2025, 11:42 PM)Shannon Wrote: You will have to reserve judgement of what DMSI-Next is, for when you run it.  6G is very, very different from the tech that v3.5 or even 4.0 was built in.

Can't wait. I'm ready to fire it up!  Pirate Pirate Pirate

Me too. Lets gooooooooo! (soon)


RE: How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? - Frosted - 04-11-2025

(04-09-2025, 07:48 PM)Zeroxmachina Wrote:
(04-09-2025, 01:23 PM)Frosted Wrote: @Zeroxmachina I don’t recommend developing and maintaining beliefs on the limits of a program based on your own personal experience with them so far. Just because DMSI has only provided those results for you so far does not mean that’s what the program is limited to.


Anyone reading this stuff, don’t develop an idea of what DMSI can or can’t do based on Zero’s ideas of what can and can’t happen. I think being proactive and realistic is helpful, but I don’t think closing off your mind to possibilities and thinking that getting laid is hard work are helpful things to be doing.

My personal experience has been pretty fantastic, to the extent that it sometimes bordered on "magical", when I was properly aligned, and in fact I'd say I've had better results than alot of guys on the forum, if the journals are any indication; but as I've said, and will stand by, the program is an amplifier, not a facilitator in and of itself. It definitely puts your subconscious to work drawing whatever energies and resources and situations you need towards you, but my point, if one takes away what I consider most important, is that you need to work with it. The same is true of any subliminal program. It's not doing the work, it's giving suggestions and your mind is hopefully executing them to the extent it can/wants to. 

Part of the reason I'm saying this is because people will sit around and say the subs "don't work", while actively negating what the subs are trying to do through their thoughts, words and actions. And furthermore, getting laid is hard work for the average guy. That's not my opinion, we've got dating app data to show it's damn near an empirical fact. If it wasn't, I doubt we'd even be having this discussion because the subliminal wouldn't exist lmfao! I think approaching things with the knowledge that it may require some degree of patience and persistence is something that will hopefully prevent people from jumping ship soon as they don't get kidnapped by super-models after a week of listening.

But I'm open to that possibility, if it were to happen.

That’s good that you got good results. Again, I agree being proactive is helpful. Cooperating with the program is also helpful.

I agree that for the average guy getting laid is hard. I wasn’t arguing about that. 

I’m of the mind that taking things into your own hands like you suggest can be a good idea, but I think it’s unhelpful to assume getting laid will always be hard work.

I think it’s possible to keep in your mind the both the idea that being proactive is good and also try not to make hard assumptions of what will or will not happen on a program or what is possible with that program. Part of cooperation is not making assumptions or having unhelpful expectations.


RE: How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? - Zane - 04-11-2025

Tbh we took part in this Experimental Sub and Even Paid for it. So Should atleast get to experience what Final Product does..Who else can tell the difference except those who used the previous versions.


RE: How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? - Shannon - 04-13-2025

(04-10-2025, 02:00 AM)samba99 Wrote:
(04-09-2025, 11:42 PM)Shannon Wrote: You will have to reserve judgement of what DMSI-Next is, for when you run it.  6G is very, very different from the tech that v3.5 or even 4.0 was built in.

Shannon

Are you planning to create a separate thread for DMSI 6G suggestions, or is that no longer on the table?

One key feature I’d love to see given more emphasis is the inclusion of a “Sex Drive & Orgasm Maximization” module. You might ask why this is important—here’s what I’ve noticed:

Whenever my sexual experiences are intense and fulfilling, it seems to supercharge my aura. In other words, I end up executing the script far more effectively, and the external results become noticeably stronger and more amplified.

It makes perfect sense to leverage this as a way to energize the script and outcomes even further, essentially creating a reinforcing feedback loop.

v4 is a significant upgrade from v3.5, and we really never got to see what it could do.  Going to 6G will be another significant upgrade.  So at this point, we no longer really know what we're dealing with anymore.

My plan right now is to incorporate either FRM or OFSF or both, depending on what the models advise, and then build it.  Only then can we know what we are dealing with. 

Your experience would not seem to be the norm, from what I have seen.