![]() |
How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Welcome! (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Welcome) +--- Forum: Customer Polls (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Customer-Polls) +--- Thread: How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? (/Thread-How-do-you-think-DMSI-v5-should-be-handled) |
RE: How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? - samba99 - 04-10-2025 (04-09-2025, 11:42 PM)Shannon Wrote: You will have to reserve judgement of what DMSI-Next is, for when you run it. 6G is very, very different from the tech that v3.5 or even 4.0 was built in. Shannon Are you planning to create a separate thread for DMSI 6G suggestions, or is that no longer on the table? One key feature I’d love to see given more emphasis is the inclusion of a “Sex Drive & Orgasm Maximization” module. You might ask why this is important—here’s what I’ve noticed: Whenever my sexual experiences are intense and fulfilling, it seems to supercharge my aura. In other words, I end up executing the script far more effectively, and the external results become noticeably stronger and more amplified. It makes perfect sense to leverage this as a way to energize the script and outcomes even further, essentially creating a reinforcing feedback loop. RE: How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? - Zeroxmachina - 04-11-2025 (04-09-2025, 11:42 PM)Shannon Wrote: You will have to reserve judgement of what DMSI-Next is, for when you run it. 6G is very, very different from the tech that v3.5 or even 4.0 was built in. Can't wait. I'm ready to fire it up! ![]() ![]() ![]() RE: How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? - StridingStrider - 04-11-2025 (04-11-2025, 05:02 AM)Zeroxmachina Wrote:(04-09-2025, 11:42 PM)Shannon Wrote: You will have to reserve judgement of what DMSI-Next is, for when you run it. 6G is very, very different from the tech that v3.5 or even 4.0 was built in. Me too. Lets gooooooooo! (soon) RE: How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? - Frosted - 04-11-2025 (04-09-2025, 07:48 PM)Zeroxmachina Wrote:(04-09-2025, 01:23 PM)Frosted Wrote: @Zeroxmachina I don’t recommend developing and maintaining beliefs on the limits of a program based on your own personal experience with them so far. Just because DMSI has only provided those results for you so far does not mean that’s what the program is limited to. That’s good that you got good results. Again, I agree being proactive is helpful. Cooperating with the program is also helpful. I agree that for the average guy getting laid is hard. I wasn’t arguing about that. I’m of the mind that taking things into your own hands like you suggest can be a good idea, but I think it’s unhelpful to assume getting laid will always be hard work. I think it’s possible to keep in your mind the both the idea that being proactive is good and also try not to make hard assumptions of what will or will not happen on a program or what is possible with that program. Part of cooperation is not making assumptions or having unhelpful expectations. RE: How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? - Zane - 04-11-2025 Tbh we took part in this Experimental Sub and Even Paid for it. So Should atleast get to experience what Final Product does..Who else can tell the difference except those who used the previous versions. RE: How do you think DMSI v5 should be handled? - Shannon - 04-13-2025 (04-10-2025, 02:00 AM)samba99 Wrote:(04-09-2025, 11:42 PM)Shannon Wrote: You will have to reserve judgement of what DMSI-Next is, for when you run it. 6G is very, very different from the tech that v3.5 or even 4.0 was built in. v4 is a significant upgrade from v3.5, and we really never got to see what it could do. Going to 6G will be another significant upgrade. So at this point, we no longer really know what we're dealing with anymore. My plan right now is to incorporate either FRM or OFSF or both, depending on what the models advise, and then build it. Only then can we know what we are dealing with. Your experience would not seem to be the norm, from what I have seen. |