Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Printable Version +- Subliminal Talk (https://subliminal-talk.com) +-- Forum: Men's Journals (18+ NSFW) (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals-18-NSFW) +--- Forum: Men's Journals (https://subliminal-talk.com/Forum-Men-s-Journals) +--- Thread: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 (/Thread-Shannon-s-Journal-Discussion-Volume-3) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
|
RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Have at ye - 09-28-2018 (09-28-2018, 08:01 AM)Hatman Wrote:(09-28-2018, 07:08 AM)SargeMaximus Wrote: Agree with Kol. Also, I had to agree with Shannon and can't believe we're still on the "looks matter" BS arguments. That is correct. Also, my ex is a fashion designer. Let me tell what I've learned - what is commonly accepted and believed to be the epitome of physical attractiveness in a person (whether male, female, or anything in-between, lol) is often subservient to current *fashion*. And these change and vary from culture to culture. And fashion is subject to various influences. This can be easily checked through research if someone does not believe me. Two zany examples off the top of my head: - This is, apparently, what people of Iran/Persia considered the epitome of female beauty in the 19th century: https://vid.alarabiya.net/images/2017/09/19/ba632d03-0395-4170-9f1d-9fcd8253f1ef/ba632d03-0395-4170-9f1d-9fcd8253f1ef_16x9_788x442.jpg - According to some researchers, the Greeks of old (from the Independent Polis times) believed that having a big penis is unattractive in a man, and was also considered to be proof of one's stupidity. Is why researchers persume a lot of the manly-man sculptures in the classic style have very small penises. The world is a rich tapestry, my friends. And change is a constant. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-28-2018 (09-26-2018, 06:05 PM)DavisMind91 Wrote: Been a while. Feels good to be back. With that being said I’d like to ask Shannon, when you build this new LTU, do you plan to have it contain modules that assist with every area of life?...I know spiritual will be a tricky one due to everyone having different beliefs and it’s probably better to Omit that area all together. I’m speaking more in terms of: I'm planning to make LTU self optimizing polymorphic, meaning that it will adapt itself to whatever you need to improve your life. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-28-2018 (09-27-2018, 04:58 AM)DavisMind91 Wrote:(09-27-2018, 12:52 AM)DarthXedonias Wrote:(09-26-2018, 08:52 PM)DavisMind91 Wrote:(09-26-2018, 08:13 PM)MasterEnki Wrote: I reckon the new LTU should focus on emotional wellbeing, positive thinking, uplifting mindset(s) and the like. Such as E2, PTPA, USLM, Overcome Procrastination, Happiness and Joy, Gratitude, old LTU, etc. (pretty certain Shannon is already planning on adding all these). I want people to achieve the goals of the program. It isn't going to be a one run and done type thing, though: people have different levels of issues to work on, different levels of readiness, different circumstances, etc. So much like E2, it will be designed to always be there to help you improve whatever you can improve when you run it. If I were to try to make it so that you ran it once for 6 months and it couldn't do anything else, that would not be taking into account the dynamic nature of people, the circumstances in which they might find themselves, etc. Basically, LTU 5.5G will be designed to improve your life as much as possible during each run, but to be used periodically to continue stepping up over time, taking into account the changes to self and circumstance each time. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Nox - 09-28-2018 (09-28-2018, 08:37 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: Just had a quick read of Shannon's journal about looks. This isn't an epiphany. It's been discussed before dmsi was even a thought here. It's why you get the old reliable advice of "treat every girl like your best friend's bratty little sister" and similar thoughts. Whatever my looks have been, I have always attracted both young and old girls. Even when i was very overweight girls liked me. Especially hot young ones. Guys think girls judge them like guys judge girls. They don't at all. Guys just want to believe they do so their excuses will work. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-28-2018 (09-27-2018, 01:23 PM)lano1106 Wrote:(09-27-2018, 10:49 AM)jesseb Wrote: Shannon I had a question about a scary experience with AM6 Stage 3 but I assume you don't read everyone journal. Can you private message so that I can ask in private, even though I wrote in my journal. Thank You @jesseb , if you want me to read a specific post, please link to it here when you reference it. Makes it much easier and less time consuming for me. @lano1106, what you are experiencing is a deep change that the program is making, which your subconscious wants to resist, but can't. It feels hopeless to prevent that change, and that hopelessness is being communicated to your conscious awareness as the depressive response you are experiencing. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-28-2018 (09-28-2018, 03:53 AM)Moud Wrote: Question for Shannon Introduce counter-programming that negates, contradicts and/or un-does the programming you wish to remove, and perhaps replaces it with programming that achieves your desires. Then use that counter-programming for long enough to achieve the desired effect. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-28-2018 (09-28-2018, 08:31 AM)Amann Wrote: @Shannon As you mentioned in your Journal...Ricardo would need to adjust his belief system if he wanted to see any change....would Universal Detox help him with that? Potentially, depending on his definition of "toxic". If his subconscious doesn't consider his beliefs to be toxic, but instead "logical and safe" then probably not. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-28-2018 (09-28-2018, 08:37 AM)Jake2015 Wrote: Just had a quick read of Shannon's journal about looks. First problem with your argument is the use of the word "feel". Feelings are illogical and irrational. You're not thinking with your logical side when you feel. Feeling arguments are therefore typically illogical, irrational and incorrect. Quote:By older I mean approx 30+. I never said that looks don't matter. What I said was that for my girlfriend, they don't matter, and my girlfriend is relatively hot. I was making the point that looks will matter to a different degree for each woman, and therefore, if you wish to get past limitations based on looks, simply find a woman who values something else more. Quote:Having been to many universities in my lifetime so far I have always come to the conclusion based on observations that women above 18 always seek out good looking men as their mate for sex and a relationship. I have been through more than a decade of college at multiple institutions as well. The average woman will consider looks according to her age, her personality, what her friends think, how much she is a leader vs a follower, how much importance she places on what others think, and how shallow she is. The types who value looks tend to be in the majority when they are younger, but they are by no means the totality. You are also failing to take into account that everyone seeks out others for sex based on what they find sexually attractive, and when you haven't met the person yet, you tend to go based on available information at hand: looks. But spend some time with them, and they have other things available for consideration, such as intelligence, personality, sense of humor, attitude, confidence, knowledge, skill, experience, etc. How much a woman goes after you based on your looks is heavily influenced by how much looks is all she has to judge you by. Quote:Above 30+ approx women tend to forgo men's looks based on what level of a provider and safety provider he can be as for them the body clock is ticking yet if they could get the whole package ie good looks too they will go for that. You are either going based on what you have experienced or what you have read. But what you have experienced will be a projection of what you believe, and therefore attune yourself to. Quote:A key requirement for many women has been grooming and grooming means congruence to the image that male is trying to exhibit. As long as he groom's as best as he can he raises up the image ladder in her eyes if he is indeed what she finds attractive. Women have a nose 2x to 10x more sensitive than men do. They therefore consider how you smell a lot more than you might think. And when you don't stay clean, you're going to polarize yourself via your pheromone signature. Either your pheromones will say, "He's not compatible reproductively" and signal this through negative scent association (i.e., you smell bad) or "he is what we are looking for to reproduce with", and creating a positive scent association (you smell good). When you don't groom yourself (primarily, staying clean) you create this polarizing reaction, and some women will respond very obviously to it in a negative way. Most women are not going to be reproductively compatible with any given man. So when we wash off those sex signals, we represent a blank slate, and they neither react positively or negatively to our scent, giving us a better chance of getting our foot in the door. It's mostly about smell, not looks. Quote:I found when I was good looking I got more attention than no2 as an older less attractive male. My personality has improved my opinions have matured and I have become a better man for it but body image matters and counts. For those women for whom that is true. Now if you attune yourself to those women who understand and appreciate what you bring to the table, they will show up in your life. Quote:Of cos this is all my current belief system and I welcome DMSI to change this in any way possible to allow me to attract higher sexier classier women than normal but my current world view is based on my years of observations. We have to figure out how to get past your resistance to change. Quote:Excuse any typos as I am typing from my phone and also haven't had time to read all posts as time is scarce for me once again. I am in the process of optimizing the fear removal modules included in B17, as they work, but need streamlining for speed and such. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Zane - 09-28-2018 "Overcome Fear of being Alone" is needed in DMSI RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - jesseb - 09-28-2018 (09-28-2018, 09:38 AM)Shannon Wrote:(09-27-2018, 01:23 PM)lano1106 Wrote:(09-27-2018, 10:49 AM)jesseb Wrote: Shannon I had a question about a scary experience with AM6 Stage 3 but I assume you don't read everyone journal. Can you private message so that I can ask in private, even though I wrote in my journal. Thank You thank you for responding @Shannon here is the link to my post and wondered what your thoughts about what happened https://subliminal-talk.com/Thread-Men-s-Journals-jes-journal-2018-AM6-?pid=206528#pid206528 It is on Post72 RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Fluffy - 09-28-2018 @Shannon If I remember correctly you met your girlfriend when you was using DMSI? I was just wondering how you went about stopping it when you decided to commit to her only. Was it whilst you was still using DMSI that you decided to commit to her only and then stopped using DMSI? Or did you stop using it and then decide to commit and then just never chose to use it again to remain faithful? I am wondering mainly because with my last two girlfriends that I met on DMSI 3.1, I chose to continue with it for quite some time when being with them. So I am just thinking for future reference, thanks. RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - wolverine_i_am - 09-28-2018 Hey Shannon, I remember you said your advisor has an ace up their sleeve in regards to the development of DMSI. Can you clarify what that is? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-28-2018 (09-28-2018, 10:07 AM)Zane Wrote: "Overcome Fear of being Alone" is needed in DMSI Wouldn't that be covered by the "Fear Removal Module" I'm working on? Designed to remove any and all fears preventing you from executing DMSI fully? RE: Shannon's Journal Discussion Volume 3 - Shannon - 09-28-2018 (09-28-2018, 10:17 AM)Fluffy Wrote: @Shannon Correct. 3.1. Quote:I was just wondering how you went about stopping it when you decided to commit to her only. Was it whilst you was still using DMSI that you decided to commit to her only and then stopped using DMSI? Or did you stop using it and then decide to commit and then just never chose to use it again to remain faithful? I stopped using it the moment I realized that my aura was too intense for her to feel comfortable with. She told me that I made her uncomfortable sometimes, it was just too intense being around me on occasion. I realized that was DMSI, and stopped using it to see for sure. The issue went away. I quit using it long before I committed to her; I had to quit it to make the relationship possible. I have not used it since because I saw in my modeling runs that it would damage my relationship with her. Quote:I am wondering mainly because with my last two girlfriends that I met on DMSI 3.1, I chose to continue with it for quite some time when being with them. So I am just thinking for future reference, thanks. This particular woman I am dating is exceptionally sensitive to energy. |